MINUTES OF MEETING REMINGTON
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

The Regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the Remington Community Development District was held on Tuesday, August 25, 2020 at 6:00 p.m. via Zoom Video Conferencing, pursuant to Executive Orders 20-52, 20-69, 20-112, 20-150 and 20-179 issued  by
Governor DeSantis on March 9, 2020, March 20, 2020, April 29, 2020, June 23, 2020 and July 30,

2020   respectively,   and   any   extensions   or   supplements   thereo_f, 120.54(5)(b)2., Florida Statutes.

Present and constituting a quorum were:

and pursuant to Section

Brian (Ken) Brown Kenneth Soukup Carl Thilburg
Tim Mehrlich PamZaresk

Chairman
Vice Chairman Assistant Secretary Assistant Secretary Assistant Secretary

Also present were:

Jason Showe Scott Clark Pete Glasscock Alan Scheerer

District Manager District Counsel District Engineer Field Manager

FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS	Roll Call
Mr. Brown called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. and Mr. Showe called the roll. All Supervisors were present.
Mr. Showe: This meeting is being conducted pursuant to the Executive Orders 20-52 and 20-69 (as extended by Executive Orders 20-112, 20-114, 20-150, 20-179 and 20-193), so the Remington CDD can conduct meetings of its Board of Supervisors without having a quorum physically present at any specific location and through utilization of video media technology. Tonight's meeting is being held to address items necessary for the proper operation of the District. This meeting is being conducted remotely via Zoom, which allows for all to participate by video or telephone conference. Access for the meeting today was provided on our website, as well as the

meeting notice and by contacting our office in advance. As of right now, I have not received any public comments, specifically for the meeting tonight, but I will continue to check my email throughout the meeting. I'll read any into the record that I receive. As with all meetings, there will be opportunity for public comment at the beginning of the meeting on any agenda item, and then we can open it up at the end again for any additional comments that might come up. We ask that those who would like to provide comment to try to use Zoom's raised hand feature and I will call on you on a first come, first serve basis. Otherwise, we will just open it up and let anyone who would like to make comments address the Board. When you address the Board, we ask that you please stay your name and address for the record and keep your comments to three minutes. We ask that no one else besides the person speaking and the Board talk at that moment. We would ask also those in attendance to silence your noise making devices and place your microphones on mute, unless you are addressing the Board.

SECOND ORDER OF BUSINESS	Modifications to Agenda
Mr. Showe: We sent out a couple of new items for consideration tonight. The Engineer did get a proposal for the additional paving work of the parking lot, which we will discuss under the Engineer's Report. We did get some proposals for some pine removal that we will let Alan talk about. Those items were added to the agenda.

THIRD ORDER OF BUSINESS	Security Report from Universal Protection
Service
Mr. Showe: I don't believe anyone from the security company is present, but we will open it up for anybody if they are present. We are going to discuss the security services contract later on in the agenda.

FOURTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Public Comment Period
Mr. Showe: We would ask you to use the raised hand feature and I will call on you in the order those hands go up. Otherwise, we will just open it up and have you state your name and address for the record. Are there any public comments at this time?
Chassidy Bowles (Westmoreland Circle): You said that you were going to discuss security. I am concerned that the gates have been open at the Partin Settlement Road Gate by our house for

several nights and there are no patrols. We are still having the same problem on Westmoreland Circle with the same people parking continuously on the road.
Mr. Showe: Alan and I will discuss the performance of the current company as well as the ability to meet our required contract and staffing times. I think it's going to be our recommendation, if the Board is amenable to go ahead and at least do a Request for Proposal (RFP) for other companies to provide that service. We are continuing to try to work with them and the limitations they have with providing available staff, which seems to be a real challenge for them at this point.
Ms. Bowles: I sent a video. One of the problems seems to be with one of our neighbors in particular. He is confronting security. I think I sent you a video of the last one.
Mr. Showe: We have that. We can't regulate the behavior of individual residents, but we
need security to perform their duty as contracted.
Ms. Bowles: Are they not allowed to call the Sheriff while they are on duty?
Mr. Showe: They are absolutely allowed to call the Sheriff if they feel like they are in danger or there is a possible crime or violation of the law at any point.
Mr. Mehrlich: I believe that also includes if they feel threatened by somebody as well.
Mr. Showe: Correct. Are there any other public comments? Hearing none,

FIFTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Approval of Minutes of the July 28, 2020
Meeting
Mr. Showe: Those minutes were provided as part of your agenda package and we can take any corrections or changes at this time.
Ms. Zaresk: Jason, I have one. On Page 5, three comments were attributed to me, but I believe Chasity was online also and those were from her.
Mr. Showe: We will have those changed. Are there any other comments? Hearing none, we need a motion to approve the minutes as amended.

On MOTION by Mr. Thilburg seconded by Mr. Brown with all in favor the Minutes of the July 28, 2020 Meeting as amended were approved.

SIXTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Public Hearings

Mr. Showe: We need a motion to open the public hearing.

On MOTION by Ms. Zaresk seconded by Mr. Soukup with all in favor the public hearing on adoption of the budget for Fiscal Year 2021 was opened.

Consideration of Resolution 2020-03 Adopting the Fiscal Year 2021 Budget and Relating to the Annual Appropriations
Mr. Showe: This resolution is the mechanism approving your Fiscal Year 2021 Proposed Budget and makes it adopted. It's in similar form to what you have seen in the past. We will note that there is no assessment increase again, so it's the same assessment level. Basically, the only changes we made since the last time, is we increased the landscaping slightly. We believe that contractor might have a minor increase this year so we increased that line and made some other adjustments. What we talked about before is that the Capital Projects Budget is a little tight this year, but I know the Board was possibly looking at an assessment increase the following year. You can certainly sustain the budget for this year and there won't be any challenges with service delivery. As we go forward, we will try to look at the capital projects overall and come up with a good assessment level that can accomplish the goals of the Board over the next five to ten years. You'11 note that there is no debt again. That was paid off. We indicated some funds for the roadway management project that is ongoing. With that, we can open it up for any members of the audience who would like to provide comment on the budget tonight. Hearing no comments,  we can return it to the Board for any questions or consideration of Resolution 2020-03.
Mr. Mehrlich: Should we look at what we are paying the security company? Do we need to put more money in security?
Mr. Showe: We will discuss that later. It's really going to be up to the Board. If the Board would like for us to move forward with the RFP process, this is a public bidding process, because of the dollar value of that contract. We would have to basically design a scope, have the Board approve that scope, go out to receive bids and go through the. ranking and bidding process. We believe that there are enough funds within your budget to accommodate if there is an increase. We increased that for next year as part of the process because we really didn't know where that was going to end up.

Mr. Mehrlich: Okay. I just wanted to make sure that there was enough money in there. It
is not always an issue, but if it is, we are covered.
Mr. Showe: We allowed for enough wiggle room in some of these account lines that we will be able to accommodate it if that's the case.
Mr. Brown: We have nothing there to begin with that we weren't able to add additional shifts sometimes.
Mr. Showe: Correct.
Mr. Brown: We added additional time in other places. On top of their base contract we had enough to be able to do that.
Mr. Showe: Correct.
Mr. Soukup: To pay for security on Halloween. Mr. Showe: Correct.
Mr. Scheerer: Fourth of July, Halloween, etc.
Ms. Zaresk: Is this the line item or area in the budget, if we wanted to have more Osceola Deputies here? Is that coming out of that account also?
Mr. Showe: Yes. That's been coming out of that line item as well. We kept that up since the kids are back in school. We cut one or two of those services going forward in October. We will see how that goes. If we need to schedule more, we can certainly do that as well. Are there any other questions on the budget? Hearing none,

On MOTION by Mr. Brown seconded by Ms. Zaresk with all in favor Resolution 2020-03 Adopting the Fiscal Year 2020 Budget and Relating to the Annual Appropriations was adopted.

Consideration of Resolution 2020-04 Imposing Special Assessments and Certifying an Assessment Roll
Mr. Showe: This is the second part of your budget process that we do every year. Attached to this resolution is the Adopted Budget you just approved, as well as your Assessment Roll. This is the mechanism that actually levies the assessments on the tax bill. Those assessments will be levied in accordance with the budget you just adopted. This is the second phase of the budget. We can open it up for public comments, since this is a public hearing on the budget. Hearing none, we

can return it back to the Board for any questions or comments that you may have on the assessment resolution.

On MOTION by Ms. Zaresk seconded by Mr. Soukup with all in favor Resolution 2020-04 Imposing Special Assessments and Certifying an Assessment Roll was adopted.

Mr. Showe: We need a motion to close the public hearing.

On MOTION by Mr. Soukup seconded by Mr. Thilburg with all in favor the public hearing on adoption of the budget for Fiscal Year 2021 was closed.

SEVENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Discussion of Security Servic.es
Mr. Showe: As some of you may or may not be aware, which Alan can attest to as well, there were several times, where the security guard either called in sick for their shift and they haven't found a replacement, so there has either not been a roving patrol or a guard at one of the guard houses. They seem to be having constant challenges in filling those spots. I think some of their service is becoming a little challenging for us as a management company. So, I think at this point, if the Board is amenable, we would just like to discuss the current provider and if the Board would like to go ahead and look at an RFP process, it's going to be a lengthy process because of the size of the contract. We also haven't bid this contract in quite some time so we may be able to get some good qualified vendors in there. We will open it up for any discussions or any comments that Alan might have on their contract and services.
Mr. Brown: I'm the same way. The past 30 days, I think when I came through the gate, nobody was there. So, they didn't have anybody. That's been at both gates, not just one gate.
Mr. Scheerer: That does affect the roving patrol because I know that we instructed them that we are taking away from roving patrol services command of the gate, which is the typical protocol because we want people at the gates. They have been having challenges at the gates, either one or two of the gates. Red feather seems to be the only consistent officer that they have.
Ms. Zaresk: Are you getting any feedback in discussions with them? Is there a problem in retaining or keeping people or are they just not able to get the right personnel?

Mr. Showe: When we first questioned it, they did say that they hadn't had a raise in four years. So, I immediately said, "If you need an additional raise, please provide us a proposal so we can present it to the Board tonight." Up until now, they have not provided that proposal.
Mr. Scheerer: That is correct.
Mr. Showe: So in consideration of that and in consideration of the challenges we've had, especially over the last three weeks with not having enough personnel to service our property, I think it would be Alan's and my recommendation to go ahead and have the Board authorize us to start the RFP process. If there are no objections, we can just bring that back to you at the next meeting with an RFP document. We would like the Board to look at the scope to make sure that when we bid that out, it's exactly what you guys want as a Board, because that is what the vendors are going to bid on. From there, it is going to be a 60 to 90-day period to get the bids out, have the Board approve it and do the review, because it is a lengthy process. We will make sure that the current vendor is okay doing a month-to-month control until such time as the Board makes a determination on how they would like to proceed with that.
Mr. Brown: You will probably get a proposal from them in response to the RFP.
Mr. Showe: We may or may not. You would be surprised. Sometimes we have vendors that decline to bid. It's a little strange, you never know what you are going to get. We will certainly make sure that they get the proposals so they are in the loop, but it is going to go in the newspaper, so you may get folks that you never even heard of before to provide those bids as well.
Mr. Mehrlich: How do we go over the scope?
Mr. Showe: Both Alan and I will work between now and your next meeting to draft the entire RFP document along with counsel, because I'm sure there is going to be some language that he is going to want in there. We will specifically have you pay attention to the scope, which will explain, what they are supposed to be doing and how they are supposed to be doing it. We will use the current contract that we have with them as a guide, but we also may have some recommended changes based on the age of that contract as well. So, we will review all of that between now and the next meeting. Then you will be able to make changes to that scope once you had a chance to review it.
Mr. Mehrlich: Correct.

Mr. Brown: Can we also ask the people that are responding to the RFP for any new practices that may have come up during all of this, without less people managing the gates for some reason? I don't know who was doing that.
Mr. Showe: There are systems that have remote gates where somebody pulls up and there's somebody in a remote location that talks to them. Most of our communities haven't wanted that type of system. They want the presence of the guard there, but if that's an option that the Board would like for us to look at, there are certainly companies out there that provide that. It hasn't been popular with CDDs, especially with a guardhouse. It's impersonal just to have somebody talk to you through a speaker.
Mr. Scheerer: It's a slow process.
Mr. Showe: Correct.
Mr. Scheerer: Because you usually take your ID and put your ID up to a scanner and then whoever is on the other end will allow you in or tell you, "No you can't come in."
Mr. Brown: I had to do that for a CDD over in Apollo Beach one time.
Mr. Showe: Yes. None of the Districts that Alan and I manage, uses that service because most of our Board want the physical presence of a guard.
Mr. Scheerer: Please note that we also have cameras that are functioning at both gate houses, that not only capture approaching and departing vehicles, but license plates. As you all know, we are very hands on with the Sheriff's Office in helping them capture whatever individuals they have been looking for most recently, doing crimes in or outside the community. So even though there is no officer there, and I know everybody wants to have a live guard there, we are capturing videos of all vehicles that are in the community. So, if something does come up, we have the video.
Mr. Showe: Correct.
Mr. Brown: The live guard there didn't stop them.
Mr. Scheerer: Yes.
Mr. Showe: That's part of the training too. It is a soft gate community, so whoever bid the job has some kind of understanding of those policies and practices. If there is no objection from the Board, it would be our recommendation that we just bring back the RFP document for the Board to review at the next meeting. We can make changes to it and get it out to bid.
Ms. Zaresk: That is a great idea.

Mr. Brown: I'm good with that.
Mr. Thilburg: I'm good.
Mr. Showe: Perfect. We don't need a motion on that. We will just bring it back. You will make a motion at your next hearing to approve that RFP document and the bidding process.

EIGHTH ORDER OF BUSINESS
Attorney

Staff Reports

Mr. Clark: There is nothing for me tonight, unless the Board has questions for me.

Engineer
Consideration of Proposal for Additional Paving Work - ADDED
Mr. Showe: Pete can go over where we are at in the paving process as well as the proposal we received.
Mr. Glasscock: Yes. Good evening, everyone. The contractor is onsite. They are starting the curbing today. The surveyors out there laid it out. They will be out there hot and heavy tomorrow morning, starting in Eagles Landing and then go smith, west and then back up north for those five pods. Alan asked me about a dip in the road on Stonewyk Way. We got a hold of TWA and it was done. It was a miracle.
Mr. Scheerer: Wow. I'm going to call you for all ofmy TWA problems too.
Mr. Glasscock: I think they forgot about it when Alan asked about it last time. When I asked them about it, I think they realized they forgot and went out to get it done.
Mr. Scheerer: Good.
Mr. Glasscock: So that's done. We believe that will fix it from the pictures that the video showed us. I don't believe the storm was the issue. I believe that's going to be fixed. That's about it. They will be going out there every day. It will require some in the road parking. The contractor has been notified to knock on doors to let them know and I think Alan is letting them know as well. So, there shouldn't be any issues there.
Mr. Scheerer: We hand delivered letters, Pete.
Mr. Glasscock: Thank you very much. I owe you lunch on that one. We did notice one car when Mark and I were laying out some of the curb to be replaced today. There was a car that looks

like it has been there for a while in the right-of-way (ROW), not on the street, but in the grass between the sidewalk and the street. I don't recall what street it was on.
Mr. Scheerer: I know where it's at.It's on Worchester Drive.
Mr. Glasscock: Yes. It's in the way of the curb replacement. Normally, I wouldn't say anything unless somebody wanted me to say something. It looks like it has been there for a while. Mr. Scheerer: That house didn't get a letter. That's notone of houses that was in the letter.
It was the house before that.
Mr. Glasscock: It was before it.
Mr. Scheerer: Let me see ifl can get out there tomorrow and knock on the door.
Mr. Glasscock: Okay. That handles everywhere we are at with the repaving operation. Alan, you asked me about a sidewalk. I owe you a letter on that one, but 118 Westmoreland Circle was kind of tricky. Ninety-nine times out of 100 is pretty cut and dry with what is going on out there. This one has a couple of things going on with it. I'll send you a report on that tomorrow and you can take it Jason. Maybe the Board might want to say something about that one.
Mr. Scheerer: We did grind the sidewalks in all of Westmoreland, so ifthere are any issues,
it wouldn't change any of the elevations due to root intrusion or anything.
Mr. Glasscock: Just so the Board knows, a lot of times the subdivision is laid out, the roads are put in on grade, but the houses are built at different times. Not often, but sometimes when the houses are built, they have to build a section of the sidewalk. Sometimes your neighbors will not be exactly per plan because the builders don't have access to the plans, so their sidewalks may not follow exactly like the road does. This happens to be one of those. You can't see where you shaved down the sidewalk. The problem is pretty much at the end of the property, but along with that, are very wet soils and high sod. So, fixing the sidewalk is not going to fix this problem, I don't believe, but the sidewalk is relatively flat and may even had a quarter of an inch grade,
Mr. Scheerer: I will look for your letter, Pete, and if I have any questions, you and I can
get together and try to get it solved. We will see what we can do.
Mr. Glasscock: 10-4. Other than that, I don't have anything else unless the Board has questions for me.
Mr. Showe: Do you want to go over the proposal for the parking lots?
Mr. Glasscock: At the Clubhouse?
Mr. Scheerer: Yes.

Mr. Glasscock: They did bring it in and I don't have it in front of me, but I believe it was
$43,000.
Mr. Showe: Correct.
Mr. Glasscock: It did come in $30,000 to $45,000 like I kind of figured it would. So, I'm good with it. I think it's within their scope. When I questioned it, they came down quite a bit.
Mr. Showe: If the Board is amenable, there is sufficient funding within your Roadway Paving Fund to accomplish that. So, we are looking for a motion of the Board if you want to move forward with doing that while they are onsite.

On MOTION by Mr. Soukup seconded by Ms. Zaresk with all in favor  the  additional  paving  work  in  the  amount  of  $30,000  to
$45,000 to be paid out of the Roadway Paving Fund was approved.

Mr. Glasscock: Pete, do you want to work with them on the Change Order. Then we can approve it.
Mr. Scheerer: I will do it.
Mr. Showe: Anything else, Pete?
Mr. Glasscock: I don't have anything else, unless the Board has anything.
Mr. Brown: I saw that you have been out on the street that I live on. Is your orange paint budget going to be okay?
Mr. Scheerer: Yes, the orange paint budget 1s good. I was marking sidewalks in Brookstone.
Mr. Glasscock: I was marking curbs.
Mr. Brown: I'm amazed at how many places there are. Mr. Showe: You have a lot of trees.
Mr. Scheerer: There was a lot of work. We did Waters Edge, Westmoreland, Harwood and Hawks Nest. Then we are going to move into Brookstone. I think one of the worst ones was in the Knightsbridge section. They will probably be heading over into Oakview at the same time they are doing the paving, but we will do that after all of the curb work is completed. So, we are going to focus now on the rest of the communities along Knightsbridge, Brookstone, Southampton, Crown Ridge, Owenshire and Arden Place. It's a lot of work. Chet and I virtually walked every street in

there to try to identify the locations and make sure that they were all done by the end of this year. So, we have plenty of money.

District Manager's Report
Approval of Check Register
Mr. Showe: In the General Fund, we have Checks 6247 through 6279 in the amount of
$79,529.97.  In your Capital  Projects Fund, we have Checks  79 and 80 for  $28,067, for a total of
$107,596.97. Alan and I can answer any questions the Board may have on those invoices.
Mr. Brown: No questions.
Mr. Showe: Then we need a motion to approve.

On MOTION by Mr. Thilburg seconded by Mr. Brown with all in favor the July 1, 2020 through July 31, 2020 Check Register totaling
$107,596.97 was approved

Balance Sheet and Income Statement
Mr. Showe: No action is required by the Board. I think we are doing well on all of our account lines in excess of what we would project for this time. We are 100% collected on our assessments, so we are in great shape.

Approval of Fiscal Year 2021 Meeting Scheduie
Mr. Showe: We have an exception for November to change the meeting to November 17th from November 29th• I recommended that we move the December meeting to December 15th , because I don't think you want to meet the week of Christmas or New Year's. I think that's typically how we've done it in the past. So, it would be our recommendation to approve, if the Board is amenable, this meeting schedule as amended, changing the December meeting to December 15th instead of December 29th•
Mr. Brown: I'm good with that, but I don't have a calendar in front of me. Isn't the 31st cutting it close on the Assessment Roll?
Mr. Showe: We will present the budget in July. It probably does cut it close. We typically do your budget in July, but because of COVID, it kind of got off schedule. We already certified your Assessment Roll so we are in compliance. We can work with it either way. Next year, we will schedule your budget for the July meeting.

On MOTION by Mr. Thilburg seconded by Ms. Zaresk with all in favor the Fiscal Year 2021 meeting schedule as amended was approved.

- Presentation of OCSO Reports
These reports were provided to the Board.

Field Manager's Report
Mr. Scheerer: The Amenity Center is in good shape, as well as the Fitness Center and swimming pool. All of the gate cameras are working. We did lose internet at the Partin Settlement Road Gate, which had no effect on the cameras itself, my ability to look at them remotely. We are working with Spectrum to get that resolved. One of the earlier comments on security over the weekend was that the E. Lakeshore Boulevard Gate wasn't manned. They had an issue with the deadbolt lock and it took them about an hour to get into the guardhouse. We had to replace that lock, but I know that security was on shift that particular evening. It was just closer to 8:00 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. by that time they were able to get into it. The ponds are in good shape. I was notified about some dead fish in the pond next to Water's Edge. It was black for a couple of days and it looks like Mother Nature took care of most of that. I reached out to Applied Aquatic, our lake vendor. They told me that with all of the heavy rain we have been getting, the rain has no oxygen. When it hit the lake sometimes, they will get some sporadic fish kills, due to zero oxygen in certain areas of the lake. I was out there earlier today and the lake looks really good. One of the questions that came up in landscaping was the street tree trimming, due to all of the rain. It was pushed back to the week of September 1st• REW will be out doing all of Remington Boulevard, Knightsbridge, the entrances and the comm n areas, not only the street signs, but the sidewalk side of all the CDD trees that border Remington Boulevard. The sidewalk repairs are ongoing. Like I said, we will be moving into Brookstone. We did add some sand to the volleyball court as well as some additional timbers on the side to help prevent washouts. We will see how that works out. We did go back through all of your storm inlets in advance of that last hurricane that never showed up, thank goodness. We did remove basically a whole bunch of trash that flows in and out of the stormwater system. We did assist in delivering notices to the homes that are going to be affected by the impending curb work. There was a main line leak under a sidewalk next to the entrance to Parkland

Square. That was Toho's responsibility. They came and dug it up. It took them about a week. I guess they finally got the sidewalk poured so that's all good. They just need to pick up their barricades. We had the pool flushers tested and they were on prior to school starting on Monday. The basketball court and tennis court resurfacing, due to weather was pushed to the end of September. REW is redoing the drainage next to the basketball court because it is holding water. I don't know ifwe have a blocked line in there. They will be working on that over the next week to try to figure out what the problem is. They need to get that water off of the court before we get it resurfaced. I can try to answer any questions that you might have.
Mr. Thilburg: Alan, on Westmoreland going west, on the walkway, someone trimmed a branch that was hitting pedestrians, but then further down the sidewalk, going west on the north side, there were branches impeding pedestrians. I'm afraid that somebody may get hurt.
Mr. Scheerer: On Westmoreland?
Mr. Thilburg: Yes, from Westmoreland heading west towards the Clubhouse.
Mr. Scheerer: Yes. They are going to be hitting those when they do the rest of the street trees along the Boulevard. Those are the ones you sent me the picture of, right?
Mr. Thilburg: Yes.
Mr. Scheerer: I can see if they can do something with it. They were supposed to have been in the middle of doing that already, but I just got word that it got pushed.  I will have it looked at to try to address some of that to get it a little higher.
Mr. Thilburg: They are hanging really low. The grass on the pond in back of Harwood Court, is over 2 feet high. I haven't seen that trimmed in a while. I took a  picture and can send it to you.

Court?

Mr. Scheerer: I just need to make sure that it's not a golf course and irrigation pond.
Mr. Thilburg: So, it's an irrigation pond, even though it backs up to homes on Harwood

Mr. Scheerer: I will need an address, Carl, in order for me to look at that. Mr. Thilburg: I will send you a couple of pictures.
Mr. Scheerer: I need to get the address to try to identify whether or not it's a COD pond

and who is responsible for it. I'm sorry that I don't have that information.
Mr. Thilburg: Okay. Thank you.
Mr. Scheerer: Yes sir. Just check with me.

Consideration of Proposal for Pine Removal - ADDED
Mr. Showe: I don't know if you want to go over those pine tree removals. Just to reiterate, especially for folks on the call tonight, the folks that are having curb work done, because they won't be able to access their driveway for a few days, were given permission from security to park in the street. Again, there may be some cars in the street, but that's because they won't be able to access their driveway. As soon as that project is over and they can resume, those waivers will go away. Alan, do you want to go over that proposal?
Mr. Scheerer: Yes. Jason received an email from a resident, Juan Rodriguez about some
pine trees along Partin Settlement Road up against the brick wall. As you leave Remington and head towards 192, there is a handful of Pine trees against the brick wall. There are about five homes there where the Pine trees apparently are impeding their screen enclosure, to the point where they had to replace their enclosure, based on the information we have. One resident just replaced his entire screen. It cost them about $2,000 because of constant fallen pine needles and stuff on the screen. So, they have approached us and asked us if there would be any objection to removing the Pine trees just outside of the brick wall. The homes that are affected, based on this email are #1045, #1047, #1049 and#1051 Berkeley Drive. We had REW provide a proposal to flush cut those trees at a cost of $2,675.
Mr. Soukup: So those are the two homes as you are going towards 192, when you get to
the pond.
Mr. Showe: Correct.
Mr. Scheerer: You have the white PVC fence and the brick fence. Right from here on down, there are about five homes that petitioned the District to remove those trees.
Mr. Mehrlich: It's just pine needles that are falling on screens? Mr. Scheerer: Pine needles and pinecones.
Mr. Showe: And sap. If you give me one minute, I can put up on the screen the pictures we received from the residents,just to give you a scope of how large some of those Pine trees are.
Mr. Mehrlich: Only on the house?
Mr. Showe: Some of them probably do not extend out far enough.
Mr. Scheerer: You can look at them before you make a decision. Jason, I don't know that we need a decision today.

Mr. Showe: I don't think there is any necessity to make a decision. The price is reasonable for the size of those trees. So, it's really up to the Board. If you want to wait and look at it over the next month and make that decision at your next meeting, we can certainly do that.
Mr. Soukup: It is not a problem removing them if it is impacting their screens.
Ms. Zaresk: I agree. Based on what we are up against, with the amount of problems we have in Club Villas with Pine trees, I get it. So, I think we should go ahead.
Mr. Brown: They are probably getting more sap than pine needles.
Mr. Soukup: Sure. The ones you get through that screen, you can't get rid of. They are stuck in there. It is on the back side of the property and not on the property, outside of the brick wall. We need to be careful that we don't open Pandoras Box.
Mr. Clark: You need to be careful about the precedent you set, because we told other people that we don't remove healthy trees. If they are shedding bark excessively, then it may be that the trees are diseased or have a reason to remove them, but if you start removing healthy trees, just because things fall from them, you are going to get a lot ofrequests and it's going to become hard to say no. So, I would take a closer look to make sure there is a good reason to remove them, instead of telling owners that they have permission to cut off some of the branches. We need to proceed carefully.
Mr. Soukup: Okay.
Mr. Mehrlich: Alight.
Mr. Scheerer: That's good logic. So, we will take a closer look, try to get more information and bring it back to the Board at next month's meeting.
Mr. Showe: Alright.
Mr. Brown: Alan, I have a general question. In the past 18 months, how many Toho failures have we seen? Is this indicative of something that's going to just keep continuing?
Mr. Scheerer: Are you talking about sanitary sewer?
Mr. Brown: Yes. We had six or seven places they had to come in, where a sanitary sewer manhole failed or was under the sidewalk. Was that water or sewer?
Mr. Scheerer: It was an irrigation line, a reclaimed water line that sprung a leak. We went ahead and shut off our meter and it was still leaking, which prompted Toho to come out.
Mr. Brown: Is there some gauge that it is going to continuous?

Mr. Scheerer: I would probably say yeah. That may be more of a question for Pete as far as the sanitary sewer goes. Obviously, we went through the Christmas nightmare a few years back over at Windsor Park and Parkland Square, due to a major failure there. This one that is on Stonewyk seemed to be a pretty reasonable repair. It was a small hole that was leaking for a while and they finally got it fixed and we re-paved the road. We have another one that rears its head every once in a while, down by the golf course Clubhouse, as you are exiting right before you get to Strathmore, but it's nothing major. I don't know to be honest with you. It's a 30-year-old system, so anything is possible. I don't have an exact answer, unless Pete has something to add to it.
Mr. Glasscock: The systems generally last 50 years. I don't know what happened with the one on Windsor. I wasn't around then, so I'm not sure. I know that the one on Stonewyk, looks like somebody bore through it. Who bored through it, I don't know, but you can tell it's a bore? It's generally 50 years before you start seeing things, but it's 30 years old so it's getting that point. I don't know what happened on Windsor Place. They found what the cause was. That's the exception versus the rule. They say 50 years, but the infrastructure has been in the ground for 100 years and is still working fine.
Mr. Brown: Okay.
Mr. Showe: That's what we have under our report.

NINTH ORDER OF BUSINESS
There not being any, the next item followed.

TENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS

Supervisor's Requests

Next Meeting Date - September 29, 2020

Mr. Showe: Our next meeting is September 29, 2020.

ELEVENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Adjournment

On MOTION by Mr. Soukup seconded by Mr. Brown with all in favor the meeting was adjourned.

Chairman/Vice Chairman