Remington
Community Development District Agenda
September 27, 2022

Agenda
Remington Community Development District
Agenda
September 20, 2022

Board of Supervisors Remington Community Development District

Dear Board Members,

The Board of Supervisors of the Remington Community Development District will meet Tuesday, September 27, 2022 at 6:00 p.m. at the Remington Recreation Center, 2651 Remington Blvd., Kissimmee, FL 34744. Following is the advance agenda for the meeting:

Roll Call
Modifications to Agenda
Security Report from DSI Security Services
Public Comment Period
Approval of Minutes of the August 30, 2022, Meeting
Discussion of Statement to Offer from American Acquisition Group, LLC
Staff Reports
Attorney
Discussion of HOA/CDD Parcels
Engineer
District Manager’s Report
Approval of Check Register
Balance Sheet and Income Statement
Presentation of OCSO Reports
Field Manager’s Report
Supervisor’s Requests
Next Meeting Date – October 25, 2022
Adjournment

Minutes
MINUTES OF MEETING REMINGTON
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

The regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the Remington Community Development District was held on Tuesday, August 30, 2022 at 6:00 p.m. at the Remington Recreation Center, 2651 Remington Boulevard, Kissimmee, Florida.

Present and constituting a quorum:

Kenneth Soukup	Chairman
Pam Zaresk	Vice Chair
Brian (Ken) Brown	Assistant Secretary
Tim Mehrlich	Assistant Secretary
David Jaisingh	Assistant Secretary Also present:
Jason Showe	District Manager
Scott Clark	District Counsel
Pete Glasscock	HWA
Alan Scheerer	Field Manager
William McLeod	DSI Security Services
Jason Folkes	DSI Security Services Residents

FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS	Roll Call
Mr. Soukup called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. and Mr. Showe called the roll. All Supervisors were present.

SECOND ORDER OF BUSINESS	Modifications to Agenda
Mr. Showe: We have a few that we added, which are on your revised agenda. There is the consideration of an agreement with Roberts Pools and an access system control maintenance proposal. Those were added. We'll go over those when we get to those items.
August 30, 2022	Remington CDD

THIRD ORDER OF BUSINESS	Security	Report	from	DSI	Security
Services
Mr. Soukup: That brings us to the Security Report.
Mr. McLeod: This month, since the last time we met, we've had 8,406 residents come through the Partin Settlement Road gate and 952 visitors. The E. Lakeshore Boulevard gate had 3,868 residents and 623 visitors. We issued 87 citations in the past 30 days and had no tows. Also, before the Board for consideration, we have a new Site Supervisor, Mr. Jason Folkes, who is seated to my left. The reason I'm asking for your consideration on this, is we're a little too low on just the Site Supervisor’s wage. The proposal asked for an increase of $1 per hour for the Site Supervisor. This hopefully will ensure stability at that post and give us the kind of leadership that we need. It increases the overall rate and blended rate, I believe by 80 cents. Just so you know, down at the bottom or in the middle of the page under the pricing form, the $177,854.75 annual cost does not include the five holiday days. So, this number is a little low. If the Board does consider moving forward with this proposal, I'll ensure that you have the correct numbers.
Mr. Showe: Well, the numbers that he shows under each column for the hours and the holiday hours or overtime are correct. It's just the totals at the bottom don't reflect the holidays.
Mr. McLeod: Right. Thank you. Ms. Zaresk: May I ask a question? Mr. Showe: Sure.
Ms. Zaresk: How many people do you have on patrol and how many people do you have that you can actually patrol? I know you have one that we put some constraints on.
Mr. Showe: Right. There are a couple of them that I don't let patrol or they're better suited for the gate than patrol. Right now, I have about four that patrol.
Ms. Zaresk: Okay. Because I know that when Diego was on the Board, he was asking for this information, and I totally get it because I spent hours going through every report that you gave us. I'm looking at it based on this and you said 87 citations, but there were 80 citations on the data that we had. Out of those, I guess there were only 1, 2, 3. and Supervisor Folkes was on here too. The greatest majority of the tickets are written by only two people.
Mr. McLeod: Okay.
Ms. Zaresk: I don't know what that means. I don’t know if it means there's only two out of there at any given time. Like I said, I see here that Officer, now Supervisor Folkes is one of them.
August 30, 2022	Remington CDD

But I'm just wondering how many other officers. Give me some sense of why this seems so out of balance.
Mr. McLeod: You mean among the officers? Ms. Zaresk: Yeah.
Mr. McLeod: Why one is writing more than others? It could be the day the week that they're patrolling. It could be their patrol styles. When I was out here writing tickets, I believe I wrote 10 in one day, but that was because I moved back immediately on who I thought was going to stay, whereas some officers might go through half of the community before they double back. But by the time they double back, the car is gone. So, it could be a number of factors. It could be that the officer is just not writing tickets and that we can monitor.
Ms. Zaresk: That's what I guess I'm getting at. When I look at all of this data and again, Diego was much more sophisticated about this than I am, so I did admire him. I was a little concerned when I saw that there weren't tickets being written by that many people. We've talked before and I've said this, but I totally understand how hard it is to get people on. Sometimes, I know you have said in the past, “It's better to keep somebody on until I can replace them than just fire them.” I got that, but when I see pictures and get feedback from people of an officer sitting in the guard house asleep…
Mr. McLeod: I understand and I assure you that I take that matter very seriously and he was dealt with at that time.
Ms. Zaresk: Well, I guess I'm looking more for insight. I stopped by the other day just to give you an idea and I've seen an officer at the front gate at about 2:30 p.m. I figured he was getting ready to come on shift, but he was just parked there with no lights, of course. When I came back a little while later, I went through the neighborhood to see if I could find the person that was on patrol, but I didn't see anybody. I'm not saying that they weren't out there, but when I came back, there was a car parked here and there was another gentleman in the office.
Mr. McLeod: Was it a DSI car? Ms. Zaresk: Yes, it was DSI car. Mr. McLeod: Okay.
Ms. Zaresk: I walked in and introduced myself and I said to the officer, “Are you on patrol today?” He said, “Yeah” and I said, “Okay.” I didn't ask the obvious question, “If you're on patrol, why are two of you sitting in there?” I actually said, “Well, I was looking at the data. It looks like
August 30, 2022	Remington CDD

you guys are doing a lot more tickets. Good job, keep it up, and do not forget to turn on the lights.” The gentleman who was in a different uniform that should've gotten names said, “Oh yeah, that's a great deterrent.” I said, “That's exactly right.” So, I guess what I'm trying to get a sense of is in your mind, is there any reason why there are two of them?
Mr. McLeod: We're dealing with human beings. I obviously cannot explain to you why two were in here. What day was this?
Ms. Zaresk: Sunday.
Mr. McLeod: On a Sunday, at 2:30 p.m., I would have had a rover, but there's no explanation why two different DSI cars were here.
Ms. Zaresk: There was one DSI car out here. Mr. McLeod: Okay.
Ms. Zaresk: There were two people, one in a different location. Mr. McLeod: Okay. I don't know why.
Ms. Zaresk: Anyway, I guess my point is that again, I know it's hard to get people on, but if we're crunching data, I think you as a supervisor know that some are better than others.
Mr. Soukup: We want the most bang for the buck.
Ms. Zaresk: Yeah. I guess that's my only comment. I’m a little concerned. I totally empathize and admit that it’s hard to bring people on board. Don't cut out off the nose to spite the face and don't fire somebody, but if one of the people that you have is asleep at the gate, I'm not saying this is indicative of what happens all the time, but when I walk in on Sunday afternoon just to say hello and they’re two people in here, why are there two people here?
Mr. McLeod: To be honest with you, one was probably watching the Rec Center. Ms. Zaresk: Right.
Mr. McLeod: The other person, when they are on patrol and they come back from lunch, for example, they're going to come here.
Ms. Zaresk: Okay. So, it might have been a lunch break.
Mr. McLeod: Yeah. Exactly. As far as the tickets go, I understand that’s one of the tools that we have. For example, I'm a little bit more lax on tickets because if it's someone's second offense, I'll actually go and knock on their door and communicate with them and say, “Hey, this is the situation.” Because we're actually having an issue where there are people that think that they're okay and are letting us know that there’s a car parked on the street, but it's from Allied, the
August 30, 2022	Remington CDD

company that you guys used to have about a year ago or two years ago. They're thinking that they're okay. Residents are not calling the right number. So, I don’t know what to tell you on that because you still have residents that are calling the wrong number and he’s trying to do the right thing. Our officers are also trying to do the right thing.
Ms. Zaresk: Can that number just be disconnected? Mr. Soukup: No, it's not the wrong number.
Ms. Zaresk: I know it's not. I realized that.
Mr. Showe: I think in the past what we said was, “Put the sticker on there.” That lets them know that they're calling the wrong number. Then when they call our office, we can educate them on the process. I think that's the biggest piece. They need to know what the right thing to do is.
Mr. McLeod: Would you prefer the gatehouse numbers? Mr. Soukup: Not the gatehouse.
Mr. Showe: The gatehouse is what they're supposed to call.
Mr. Soukup: Yeah. It's on the website as well. They can submit their email through the website.
Ms. Zaresk: Okay. Thanks. I was just looking for insight. I'm going to be doing that a lot more. It’s helpful to you as the Supervisor, in terms of the data. In terms of doing the same thing that I did, which is, how many tickets did I write, how many officers out of that group, what are the times, what are the locations and is there's any way that data can be parsed a little bit?
Mr. McLeod: If you email me, I think there's a way that I can track it and send it to you. Ms. Zaresk: I went through 291 records.
Mr. McLeod: I know, but if there's something that you want, specifically a date range, I can send you that data.
Ms. Zaresk: Okay.
Mr. McLeod: That way you're not sitting there going through each and every one. Mr. Brown: That's from specific data?
Ms. Zaresk: That's the data that was sent. Mr. Showe: They send us a daily report.
Mr. Brown: Is there any way, just out of curiosity, for you to send her the officers on duty for that date range?
Ms. Zaresk: Yeah. I have them.
August 30, 2022	Remington CDD

Mr. Brown: No. What I'm saying is if he sent you who was here.
Mr. McLeod: Yeah, I’ll do that. I can send you the actual incident reports.
Mr. Showe: But also, each daily report should tell you the officer when they check in and check out.
Mr. McLeod: Right.
Ms. Zaresk: Okay. Thank you. Mr. McLeod: You're welcome.
Mr. Soukup: Are there any questions?
Mr. Mehrlich: Do we need a motion to approve it?
Mr. Showe: That's up to the Board. It is about $0.80 more per hour. Obviously, the budget can accommodate it. We did build some flexibility in there. So, it's really up to you guys if you choose to approve it.
Ms. Zaresk: One more clarification. That's an additional Site Supervisor? Mr. McLeod: No. I already have Site Supervisors.

Mr. Showe: One other item. Obviously, we changed the schedule during the summer so that there was less roving Monday through Friday. So, somebody was here, but now that the kids are back in school, I think it's our recommendation, if the Board's amenable, that we go back to the patrol we were doing before with a lot more roving patrol.
Mr. Soukup: Right. I agree.
There was Board consensus.
Mr. Soukup: We’re good with that.
Mr. Scheerer: Can you let us know when that's going to take effect? Mr. McLeod: On Tuesday.
Mr. Scheerer: The first of September? Mr. McLeod: Yeah.
Mr. Showe: Perfect.
August 30, 2022	Remington CDD

Ms. Zaresk: I know that there is one person that the Board decided to be at the gate. Do we have any idea how long that's been going on?
Mr. Soukup: Which person?
Mr. Scheerer: Do you mean, Leona? She's still working. Mr. McLeod: Yeah.
Mr. Scheerer: When she's not here, I know I hear from her at the E. Lakeshore Boulevard Gate. She does an outstanding job. She's a great officer.
Mr. McLeod: Is there concern with her?
Ms. Zaresk: No. Because of our requests for that to continue, I did not want them to feel like we were overburdening you with that, but it's working out.
Mr. McLeod: She loves working the gate, specifically E. Lakeshore Boulevard. Mr. Scheerer: She does an excellent job. She really does.
Ms. Zaresk: I'm not trying to interject anything she's doing. I just wanted to make sure that we weren't not getting something. Thank you.

FOURTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Public Comment Period
Mr. Soukup: Okay. That brings us to the public comment period. Please state your name, address, and keep your comments to a minimum three minutes.
Resident (Irene Patrick, Farrington Lane): My name is Ms. Irene Patrick. I’m here with my husband.
Mr. Soukup: Do you have a comment or anything you'd like to say? Resident (Irene Patrick, Farrington Lane): Yes. We're glad to be here. Mr. Soukup: Welcome.
Resident (Irene Patrick, Farrington Lane): Thank you. We sent out a letter to John, the manager of the golf course, and he has responded. I also sent letters to the HOA members, and they reviewed all of the problems last week and the last week and a half. Now I just want to give you an update of where we are.
Mr. Soukup: Well, any matter for the HOA, you have to take up directly with them. We are the CDD.
August 30, 2022	Remington CDD

Mr. Scheerer: I came by your house and I called and left you a voicemail. We were there on Friday. What I was going to tell Scott was, there's a couple of parcels throughout community that are CDD-maintained, but they're still in the name of the HOA.
Mr. Soukup: Okay.
Mr. Scheerer: As you go into Waters Edge, passing the shrubs on the right-hand side, she's the first house on the right. That area is actually an area we should be maintaining. I met out there Friday with John with REW. We're going to clean it up. We’re going to remove all of the overhanging branches. My question for you in the voicemail was, how much do you want us to remove? Because if I remove all of the under canopy that's there, people are going to see right into your house or we'll just clean it up and make it look pretty and maintain it that way.
Resident (Irene Patrick, Farrington Lane): We would really like for you to remove all of the trees that are impeding us.
Mr. Scheerer: Are you going to be home on Friday morning? Resident (Irene Patrick, Farrington Lane): Yes.
Mr. Scheerer: I'll meet you at your house on Friday morning at about 8:30 a.m. Resident (Irene Patrick, Farrington Lane): We'll talked more about it?
Mr. Scheerer: Yeah, I have John with me. He's the Landscape Manager? Resident (Irene Patrick, Farrington Lane): Yes.
Mr. Scheerer: Like I said, I called your number and I did leave you a voicemail. Show me what you want and we'll make it happen. Then we'll take care of it going forward.
Resident (Irene Patrick, Farrington Lane): Thank you so much.
Mr. Scheerer: Then will work with the attorney in getting some of these parcels switched out because it still says HOA owned and they're not the HOA’s.
Resident (Irene Patrick, Farrington Lane): What time on Friday?
Mr. Scheerer: 8:30 a.m. John gets here at 8:30 a.m. Because I have to go to Westmoreland.
I got a similar request at Westmoreland.
Resident (Irene Patrick, Farrington Lane): Okay. Mr. Scheerer: I got you.
Resident (Irene Patrick, Farrington Lane): Thank you so much. We have a few more issues. The next one is roots are impeding the structure of our home because of the clustering of the trees.
August 30, 2022	Remington CDD

As a result, also we had mold along the side of the whole house. Because it’s a health issue, I was forced to paint it. It was just completed last week.
Mr. Jaisingh: Is it mold or algae?
Resident (Irene Patrick, Farrington Lane): Mold.
Mr. Scheerer: How do you know it's mold? Was it tested?
Resident (Irene Patrick, Farrington Lane): No. The painter said it's mold. Mr. Soukup: It's mold on the outside of the home?
Resident (Irene Patrick, Farrington Lane): Yes.
Mr. Scheerer: I'm surprised by that. It is a dense canopy to the right, but there's a 5-to-10- foot gap between her house and those shrubs.
Mr. Soukup: Right.
Mr. Scheerer: I can't speak on mold or anything like that, but I noticed the house was getting painted.
Resident (Irene Patrick, Farrington Lane): Right.
Mr. Scheerer: But as far as the tree roots go, I think we did that similar to somebody that had Cypress tree roots. I think we removed several of them as best we could from beyond the property line. But going forward, you're going to have to do the maintenance on your side of the property. I think it's the way we left it with the other homeowner. We can talk about that on Friday when I meet with you.
Resident (Irene Patrick, Farrington Lane): Alright. Because of the trees being unkempt trimming of the leaves, some branches are resting on the roof.
Mr. Scheerer: The way that works is it's called air rights. You as a homeowner, have the authority to go straight up on your property line and trim anything on your side of the property. We do that everywhere in the State of Florida. The homeowner actually has the authority to do that. Should you ask that question, we would have told you that. You can maintain that straight up. It's your property line. It’s coming out on your property and trimming it, but we don't typically have a lot of areas where we trim off of people's homes. The homeowner takes care of that.
Resident (Irene Patrick, Farrington Lane): Okay. Alright. That's it. Mr. Soukup: Okay. Anyone else?
Mr. Brown: I guess you’re carrying stuff out?
August 30, 2022	Remington CDD

Mr. Scheerer: There's a lot of underbrush there, but there are a few hardwood trees. We can trim straight up because we're getting ready to go into October. As you know, the Board approved some tree trimming. We're going to make that part of that process as far as the trees go, but the under canopy, she wants all of that removed. We can get that done. Right now, we're just going to clean it up. I'll just see what it is you want.
Resident (Irene Patrick, Farrington Lane): On Friday. Mr. Scheerer: On Friday.
Resident (Irene Patrick, Farrington Lane): Thank you so much. Mr. Soukup: Thank you. Next.
Resident (Matt Psarsky, Westmoreland Circle): Do we still have the Sheriff contract? Mr. Showe: Oh, yeah.
Mr. Soukup: Yes, we do.
Mr. Scheerer: They were just here yesterday morning at the school zone.
Mr. McLeod: They've been helping out in the school zones, thankfully. Westmoreland had a couple of issues with parents parking there.
Mr. Scheerer: I had a call from the officer. She was actually on duty. We were discussing the school zone and some of the frustrations. We also had directed her over here to Knightsbridge for some speeding. I talked about maybe getting the motorcycle officer because it was neat to have him down here, pulling people over for speeding. I had a guy pass me while the bus was stopped with red lights on. I was behind the bus and he went around me and the bus. I hit my horn. It's just frustrating. We also ask them to focus at the end of Knightsbridge. There's a resident that came to the last couple of meetings about potential speeding back there until we come up with a speed table.
Resident (Matt Psarsky, Westmoreland Circle): There's been some parents sitting in the center of Remington Boulevard waiting for the bus at Westmoreland. Traffic was backed up across Partin Settlement Road.
Resident (Matt Psarsky, Westmoreland Circle): This new Charter School doesn't have a clue what they're doing. As a matter of fact, it’s just a big giant roadblock.
Mr. Scheerer: This is a mess. One of the things that she had recommended, and I talked to Jason briefly about it, was maybe hiring a couple of additional patrols for that morning and try to deal with the afternoon. She said, “I could’ve written 50 tickets when I pulled in the community,
August 30, 2022	Remington CDD

but I'm only one person.” So, I have to work with Jason and within the budget, if we have to hire maybe a couple more.
Resident (Matt Psarsky, Westmoreland Circle): This afternoon, it was backed up almost to the baseball field. Isn’t it the responsibility of the school to do anything? Is there a policy with what they're doing?
Mr. Scheerer: Well, they've got a couple of people out there trying to direct the traffic, but the parents all stage. When school gets out, they're out there an hour-and-a-half early to be the first car in line. They are in the left-hand turn lane just past the parking gate. They're staged there. I told her about Somerset and Oakview where the Sheriff's Office requested that the CDD install the ‘No Parking’ signs. They had DOT stamped signs. We did all of that and she said, "Yeah, they're parked there.” I said, "Well, give them a ticket."
Resident (Matt Psarsky, Westmoreland Circle): They were doing that today. Mr. Scheerer: They were issuing tickets?
Resident (Matt Psarsky, Westmoreland Circle): Oh, yeah. Mr. Scheerer: Good.
Resident (Matt Psarsky, Westmoreland Circle): One last thing, is it security policy for the gate to be opened on the barcode side and to have three cones at 8:00 p.m. on Monday evening for almost three-and-a-half hours.
Mr. Scheerer: What time?
Resident (Matt Psarsky, Westmoreland Circle): It started around 7:30 p.m. I drove there about three or four times.
Mr. Scheerer: You know what? There was an issue with that scanner. I'm not sure if there was a problem. Maybe they were just directing people.
Resident (Matt Psarsky, Westmoreland Circle): The scanner was working perfectly. It was the non-resident side that was coned off.
Mr. Scheerer: The one closest to the gate.
Resident (Matt Psarsky, Westmoreland Circle): That was coned off. Mr. Scheerer: Okay.
Mr. McLeod: What gate was this?
Resident (Matt Psarsky, Westmoreland Circle): The Partin Settlement Road gate. Mr. McLeod: I will look into it.
August 30, 2022	Remington CDD

Mr. Soukup: Thank you.
Resident (Matt Psarsky, Westmoreland Circle): I drove through three different times. Resident (Not Identified): I just want to reiterate that if you hook the light to the ignition,
it will be on. I know that you guys don't like the light to be on when we put a ticket on the window. But you have to go through so many people that it just becomes second nature. Because as you get new guards and the light stays on all the time, if it’s hooked to the ignition of the car, it won't be an issue anymore.
Mr. McLeod: We're not going to do that, but we’ll reiterate that they need to turn on their
lights.

Mr. Soukup: Right. Keep that in mind.
Resident (Not Identified): I have a couple of issues. People are speeding when they are
inside here. Also, in my area, Gleneagles, people are speeding. People are riding motorcycles next to kids on the sidewalks. The other thing is the barcode scanner system over here, is not working properly today.
Mr. Scheerer: It should be working. ACT was out again today and reset the eMerge. They did a couple of tests. I'll give you my card. You can just contact me directly if you're still having problems. But we did have an issue with this one. There was a power surge from lightning. They came back out.
Resident (Not Identified): My card wasn’t working last three months, especially at that
one.

Mr. Scheerer: How old is your barcode? Because they don't last forever. Resident (Not Identified): I will say maybe a year.
Mr. Soukup: Mine is old and it works on that one, but won't work here. So, I have to get it
replaced.
Mr. Scheerer: I'll give you my card after the meeting and you can contact me.
Resident (Not Identified): The other thing is, how can I get in contact with my HOA over
there?

Mr. Showe: I think the contact there is Mr. Daniel Espinoza. He is the manager.
Resident (Not Identified): I called him. He’s difficult to contact. No one answers. They
don’t respond to emails. I cannot get a hold of my HOA. Mr. Soukup: Did you try their website?
August 30, 2022	Remington CDD

Resident (Not Identified): I called the number on the website. The communication is not flowing.
Mr. Soukup: Thanks.
Ms. Zaresk: Which HOA is that?
Mr. Soukup: Gleneagles. We have very little contact with them. Resident (Not Identified): They rarely respond.
Mr. Scheerer: I don't know who the President is now. Resident (Not Identified): I don't know if they have meetings. Mr. Showe: They're required to.
Mr. Soukup: They are supposed to. Mr. Scheerer: At least have one a year.
Resident (Not Identified): I register on an application they sent one time on a flyer and the application doesn't have any information on the Bylaws. I was looking for dates for the meeting and couldn’t find anything.
Mr. Soukup: There’s nothing.
Resident (Not Identified): So, I don’t know what’s happening. Maybe somebody can shed some light on that.
Mr. Showe: They're a separate organization. We don't have any contact with them.
Mr. Soukup: The best source is maybe ask your neighbors to see if they've ever reached out to them and had any success.
Resident (Not Identified): I just moved here.
Mr. Mehrlich: Call the management company's main office number. Resident (Not Identified): It's hard to get hold of them.
Mr. Mehrlich: I know it's hard, but you just have to keep trying.
Resident (Not Identified): My experience has not been the best experience with them.
Thank you.
Mr. Soukup: Thank you.
Ms. Zaresk: Thank you.
Mr. Soukup: That will close the public period.
August 30, 2022	Remington CDD

FIFTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Approval of Minutes of the July 26, 2022
Meeting
Mr. Soukup: This will bring us to approval of the minutes of the July 26th meeting. Are there any changes or corrections?
Ms. Zaresk: No.

SIXTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Consideration	of	Aquatic	Plant
Management Agreement Renewal with Applied Aquatic
Mr. Soukup: That brings us to the consideration of the first amendment to the agreement for water plant management.
Mr. Showe: Sure. This is actually the first time that I think they've asked for a raise in probably six or seven years.
Mr. Scheerer: Since 2014.
Mr. Showe: Yeah, it's been a long time. They asked for a 9% increase. It's a little less than what we put in the budget because we anticipated those increases with the chemicals. I think they do a great job and we recommend you go ahead and approve that. That's up to the Board.
Mr. Soukup: Are there any questions? Hearing none, we need a motion.

SEVENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Consideration of the First Amendment to
the Agreement for Provision of Pool Maintenance Services with Roberts Pool Service and Repair, Inc. - Added
Mr. Soukup: Next is the first amendment to the agreement for pool maintenance services with Roberts Pool Service and Repair. Are we going to do that one or move it to the next meeting?
Mr. Showe: No, actually, we did add that one. We got it late. Mr. Scheerer: We handed it out to the Board.
August 30, 2022	Remington CDD

Mr. Showe: It's $50 a month more, which again is actually cheaper than what we've seen for most increases for most pool companies. Again, there's money in the budget to cover that increase.
Mr. Brown: I'm hoping that the agenda just has a typo. Mr. Showe: Yes.
Mr. Scheerer: Yeah, it is. It’s not “Poo” service. Mr. Showe: We recommend approval.
Mr. Soukup: Are there any questions on that proposal? If not, we need a motion for approval.

EIGHTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Access	Control	Systems	Planned
Maintenance Proposal - Added
Mr. Showe: Actually, there's one other item we added that's on the paper agenda and in your agenda package on Page 25. This is just something that Alan and I were thinking of. ACT offered a maintenance package on those dates to try to help some of the downtime that we have. They've offered two different plans. It's just really for Board consideration should you choose to do it or not.
Mr. Scheerer: They would come out and test the battery, emergency response devices and move and do everything. We don't have to pay for callbacks within a 30-day period. So, if the same problems happen with the gate, they will come out and won’t bill us. They will test loop detectors, monitor the operation, check the belts, change equipment, inspect circuit Boards, clean the inside as needed, tighten all of the anchor bolts and limit switches. It's just up to the Board on the level of service. They offered us four times a year, quarterly service at $2,060 or twice a year at $1,030. We've never had that here. We have a lot of issues with the gates. They're talking about the laser scanners. They're talking about the gate operators and the gear reducers, which are expensive. So, if we can catch it early enough, maybe it'll limit future expenses.
Mr. Showe: And downtime.
August 30, 2022	Remington CDD

Mr. Soukup: My experience with these guys on the other side of the fence, I’ve had vehicles hit gates and they had to come out and fix it. These guys are extremely cheap.
Mr. Scheerer: Yeah.
Mr. Soukup: I'm shocked to read an estimate like that.
Mr. Scheerer: Their price point is pretty good. They're very responsive. We've got a history.
They know us well. But it's just some for your consideration.
Mr. Showe: If there’s something that you're not sure about or you might want to lean towards it, we can always do the twice a year to start.
Mr. Soukup: My input would be four times a year for these gates. Mr. Scheerer: Yeah. $2,000. That’s a steal.
Mr. Soukup: That's a smart thing to do quarterly. Mr. Scheerer: Yeah.
Mr. Soukup: Are there any questions on that proposal? If not, we need a motion for approval.
Mr. Mehrlich: What would you consider?
Mr. Soukup: Four times a year, due to the large volume of cars going through there.
Mr. Showe: If you consider there's no fee for a call back within 30 days, that covers you for a pretty good amount of time.
Mr. Soukup: Absolutely.

NINTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Discussion of Offer from FTE for Right of
Way
Mr. Showe: The next item is the discussion of offer from FTE. I know Scott's got some information on that.
Mr. Clark: I'm not here to ask the Board to take any action. I wanted to let you know that we received a communication offer for $35,000 for taking what they call the right of way (ROW) to have drainage in Tract A, which is the wetland in the back corner. I think we need to evaluate a few things. The first offer is usually not the best offer. Like cars, it has to have the right color. This
August 30, 2022	Remington CDD

particular property is within a conservation easement and because of that, I believe that we have a copy of the easement back to the beginning of the project. It's very restrictive. There is nothing that could be done on that property per the easement. Part of what they’re going to have to demonstrate to us is that they have been issued a permit by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) for this activity and they negotiated with them the terms of this easement. They are going to have to amend the easement or release it or do something. We're going to need to make sure that we don't get in trouble with them.
Mr. Soukup: Right.
Mr. Clark: Second or thirdly on that, you guys may just take a look at the permit and make
sure.
Mr. Glasscock: Typically, they can do what they want. If there's any wetlands or anything
out there, they'll have to mitigate it. But as far as the property itself, we can look through it. But Mark and I talked about it. They can take whatever they want.
Mr. Clark: From our perspective, we want them to negotiate it at their own cost and the Water Management District to say, "Hey, we're releasing this."
Mr. Soukup: Yeah.
Mr. Clark: Because they replaced it with other property and we don't have a concern about it. I am going to reach out to them and just go over the different concerns and ask them if they have answers to them now or if it’s something that they're working on. Then we will bring it back.
Mr. Soukup: Thank you. Ms. Zaresk: Sounds good.
Mr. Clark: Are there any questions on that? Mr. Soukup: None at this time.

TENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Discussion  of  HOA  Garage  Sale  and
National Night Out Events
Mr. Showe: The next item is the request from the HOA. We did provide the email that I received in the agenda package. I also handed out an email that the resident brought this evening. There's a garage sale on October 22nd. They want to bring two to three food trucks for the garage sale. There also is a National Night Out on October 11th. They would also like to place the signs out similar to the CDD signs just on the front guardhouses. I don't know that we specifically have
August 30, 2022	Remington CDD

any issues with any of those requests, but I wanted to make sure that the Board was aware and approved those.
Ms. Zaresk: No problem. It's good to have HOA sponsored events. Mr. Soukup: Absolutely. That’s always a positive.

ELEVENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Staff Reports
Attorney
Mr. Showe: That's all we have. We can go to Staff Reports. We’ll start with District Counsel.
Mr. Clark: Towards the end of the last meeting, an issue was raised about whether we wanted to have roving security patrols in Club Villas.
Mr. Soukup: Right.
Mr. Clark: In thinking about that, there's no reason that we cannot have patrols because we don’t own the roads, but to do so, I want to have a relatively simple arrangement with the HOA. I put it before you. This allows us to do that. It would give us a license to do the roving patrol. They would indemnify us from anything that occurs that would be their responsibility on their roads. They agree to maintain insurance. It's similar to an agreement that we had with Gleneagles. If the Board approves what we're doing here, then I would go ahead and send this agreement to the HOA or their attorney and see if it's okay with them. If there are no questions, I would ask for a motion to proceed with this.
Mr. Soukup: Does anyone have any questions?
Mr. Brown: It addresses Leland Management. Is there anything in here, and maybe it's automatic that if they change their management company, it will transfer it over to the new management company?
Mr. Clark: Yeah. The agreement is with that entity and their existing contact address. If that changes, then it changes automatically because our agreement is not with Leland. It is with the HOA.
Mr. Brown: Okay.
August 30, 2022	Remington CDD

Mr. Showe: It also protects the CDD. It provides a lot of protection for us, which is good. Mr. Soukup: Absolutely. We have to have that. Are there any questions t?
Mr. Brown: No, I’m good. Do we need a motion?
Mr. Showe: A motion to direct counsel to send it over and negotiate would be in order.

Mr. Clark: That's the only item I had.
Mr. Brown: Have you had any further discussions with the county? Mr. Clark: Yes.

Engineer
Mr. Soukup: Okay, that brings us to engineering.
Mr. Glasscock: We obtained prices for speed humps or speed bumps at Knightsbridge. They could be just as challenging with what the prices of speed bumps were. I did actually call a guy that I had worked with before and sent my requirements to him. He said, “Give me five minutes.” So, he called me back. He was up to about $8,500. He called his suppliers, but he didn't send me the paperwork or cut sheets on the actual speed bumps. I told him to provide the standard three- and half-inch high that come in at 8 or 12-inch wide. We probably would rather have a double row on both sides with one hump. I figured what we'd do to maximize that would be double row and to have it 8 inches apart. He was up to right about $8,500. I told him that I need to see the cut sheets and we would put in one.
Mr. Soukup: Right.
Mr. Glasscock: He promised me that he would have it tomorrow. I can't imagine that it would be more than $10,000, if this is the way you all want to go. If you all wanted to, I would ask the Chairman to sign an agreement in a not-to-exceed of $8,500 or you can wait until…
Mr. Soukup: I agree that we should do a not-to-exceed $10,000 to get the same result. Mr. Mehrlich: Those are temporary one's, right?
Mr. Glasscock: No, they'd be permanent.
August 30, 2022	Remington CDD

Mr. Brown: They're nailed in.
Mr. Scheerer: Are those the Easy Rider where they use a lag shield and not a spike. Mr. Glasscock: No, it has a spike.
Mr. Jaisingh: The thing with the spike, if you get somebody with a truck through there, they will break.
Mr. Scheerer: Hey, Pete, do you know Mr. Phil Fausnight?
Mr. Glasscock: I called them, but they said that they weren't interested. Mr. Scheerer: Oh, Phil. I'm calling Phil now.
Mr. Showe: I've got some companies too.
Mr. Scheerer: If the Board remembers, we used to have these spiked speed bumps at Partin Settlement Road and it was a nightmare, especially as was described. Somebody hit those and started yanking them out and it created more problems than solving the problem. So, I think we need to look at the Easy Rider speed tables and then I can get with Clayton in my office.
Mr. Brown: It’s kind of the same thing.
Mr. Scheerer: No, they use a lag shield. You put the shield in the asphalt and then you impact into the lag shield.
Mr. Glasscock: I can tell them to use those.
Mr. Scheerer: I'd like to see the cut sheet on them too. Mr. Glasscock: Yeah.
Mr. Soukup: Alright. At this point, we’ll table it for further specifications. Is there anything
else?
Mr. Glasscock: That was all, unless you had any questions.

District Manager’s Report
Approval of Check Register
Mr. Soukup: That brings us to the District Manager's Report.
Mr. Showe: In your General Fund, we have Checks #6803 through #6823 totaling
$90,249.88. Alan and I can answer any questions you might have on those invoices.
Mr. Soukup: Are there any questions?
Mr. Showe: Otherwise, we will take a motion to approve.
August 30, 2022	Remington CDD

Balance Sheet and Income Statement
Mr. Showe: No action is required by the Board. I'll point out that you are doing pretty well on your budget and actuals in your General Fund and we collected 100% of our assessments. So, we're in great shape there.

Presentation of OCSO Reports
Mr. Showe: There was a question earlier about the Osceola County Sheriff's Office. Those reports are in the agenda package. You can see that some officers are writing a lot of tickets, which is good. That's what we like to see.

Field Manager’s Report
Mr. Showe: With that, we can have Alan go through the Field Manager’s Report.
Mr. Scheerer: Yeah, we're pretty redundant on the Field Report. We are gearing up for the fall budget money to come in line. We'll be looking at pressure washing and the lifting of the trees after we select the neighborhoods. Obviously, for National Night Out, we'll make sure that we get in and test all of the outlets. For the holiday Christmas lighting at the entrances, we will make sure that all GFIs are working. That's something that will be coming up down the road. The Amenity Center is in good shape. Mr. Mehrlich, just a question for you. There are two different heights for volleyball nets in the high school, one for boys and one for girls. I'm assuming you want it at the girl's height. They're not the same height. There's about a six-inch difference for boys and girls.
Mr. Mehrlich: I'll find out. There’s one height that they're using.
Mr. Scheerer: Okay. Whatever it is, let me know. I think it's 14 inches. Anyway. We're going to start working on that this week.
Mr. Mehrlich: I'll email you.
Mr. Scheerer: Yeah, email me or shoot me a text or something. The fitness equipment is in good shape. The cameras are in good shape. The pool is in good shape. We did have an issue with the Partin Settlement Road gate phone. We finally got Century Link to come out on Saturday and fixed the phone. I called, tested the phone and left a test message on the voicemail for security, so that's good. We had a resident concerned about the laser scanners. They were out. They reset the
August 30, 2022	Remington CDD

eMerge panel on the E. Lakeshore Boulevard gate and they replaced a gate arm on the Partin Settlement Road gate. All of the ponds are in good shape. We continue to meet with REW every week. Irrigation inspections are going on. We did have a resident that was concerned about ants on the baseball field. I guess they were out there with their kids and their dogs and with the rain and the heat, we were getting ants. I talked to Jason and we authorized REW to bring TruGreen out here and they did a blanket application of Top Choice, which should give us a year's coverage. Any ants that emerge within the 12 months, the area gets retreated at no cost to us. We're going to look at doing this program going forward. I saw that he had some leftover, so he was doing it around the basketball court, the tennis court and here. We'll keep an eye on that program. They say, after three years you start building this product up. You really don't have a pest problem in your lawn. That was about $1,000, so I thought that was money well spent. We had some flooding on Remington Boulevard by Hawks Nest on Harwood. REW put in several drains in that area. I haven't seen any water there, so maybe that's good. We got that done.
Mr. Soukup: The drains look good with the rains.
Mr. Scheerer: Yeah. That's all I have for right now. Like I said, we're going to be gearing up for the Fall and all of the holiday fun.
Ms. Zaresk: I noticed in the security report that there was some sort of a crash over by Eagles Landings. We didn't have any damage?
Mr. Showe: No.
Mr. Scheerer: Ken?
Mr. Brown: Somebody hit a tree in here, didn't they?
Mr. Scheerer: I've got trees hit everywhere. These people can't drive. Go down Knightsbridge and see all the bark missing off of the trees. We're keeping an eye on the tree. It'll probably be okay. It just knocked some bark off. I think it will be all right. I think the trees are sturdier than any of the cars.
Mr. Brown: The bumper was laying there.

TWELFTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Supervisor’s Requests
Mr. Soukup: Okay, that brings us to Supervisor’s requests. Mr. Mehrlich? Mr. Mehrlich: No.
Mr. Soukup: Ms. Zaresk?
August 30, 2022	Remington CDD

Ms. Zaresk: No, I put mine to security. I really hope they mesh something.
Mr. Showe: I've noticed similar patterns. I think Alan and I have even talked about it, so we'll follow up with them too to make sure.
Mr. Jaisingh: They write three tickets a night. It seems like they write the three tickets and move on.
Ms. Zaresk: Well, it depends on who it is. I mean, we have one guy or person. I don't know if it's a guy or a girl, but on one day between 1:49 p.m. and 1:01 p.m., he wrote 10 tickets. On August 7th between 2:30 p.m. and 12:21 p.m., he wrote seven tickets. That's why I'm saying there are certain officers that are obviously writing more than others.
Mr. Mehrlich: Yeah. Here on the 20th, 10 tickets were written. Ms. Zaresk: Right.
Mr. Mehrlich: But as a rule, with the exceptions like you noticed, it seems like they write three a night to try to appease everyone.
Ms. Zaresk: It isn’t working.
Mr. Mehrlich: Yeah. But the streets do look better. Isolated incidents don't, but as a rule, the streets from what I've looked at, do look better.
Mr. Scheerer: Well, we got the daytime patrol back, so we'll see if it increases as well. Mr. Soukup: Right.
Mr. Scheerer: It's going to mess these people around. They're not going to know what to
think.
Mr. Brown: I haven't driven through here at night in a couple of days, so it might be fixed,
but on Somerset, the one on the left when you first come in, at night you couldn't see the lights because the bushes have grown up between the light.
Mr. Scheerer: It's the low light ambient effect that we're going for. We reflect it off the shrubs so that people don't get lights shining in their windows. I'll take care of it. Sorry.

THIRTEENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Next Meeting Date – September 27, 2022
Mr. Soukup: Our next meeting is set for September 27, 2022.

FOURTEENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Adjournment
Mr. Soukup adjourned the meeting.
August 30, 2022	Remington CDD

Secretary/Assistant Secretary	Chairman/Vice Chairman

Section VI

September 1, 2022

Certified Mail No.:	7022 0410 0001 9331 5046
Remington CDD	PROJECT NAME:	Partin Settlement Road
C/O Government MGMT Services	PARCEL NO.:	PS 728A/728B/728C 219 E. Livingston St.		PS 828A/828B
Orlando, FL 32801-1508

Dear Property Owner,

As you may be aware, Osceola County is in the process of negotiating the acquisition of property and property rights for the project referenced above. American Acquisition Group, LLC is representing Osceola County for this project.

This letter is intended to help you understand the need and purpose of each document contained herein, including:

STATEMENT OF OFFER: This is the Written Offer from Osceola County for Parcel PS 728A, a 6,427 square foot Temporary Construction Easement, Parcel PS 728B, a 3,272 square foot Temporary Construction Easement, Parcel PS 728C, a 2,562 square foot Temporary Construction Easement, Parcel PS 828A, a 1,928 square foot Permanent Easement, Parcel PS 828B, a 147 square foot Permanent Easement. Please sign on the Receipt Acknowledged By line, print your name, add the date, and return the original statement to me in the envelope provided. This is not an agreement and in no way will bind you to a settlement.

PURCHASE AGREEMENT: This is a standard purchase agreement which provides a breakdown of the compensation offered for the Temporary Construction Easements and Permanent Easements. The summary of values is based on the Appraisal Report.

PARCEL SKETCH/LEGAL DESCRIPTION: This depicts and describes the Temporary Construction Easement and Permanent Easement locations, including the purpose of the Temporary Construction Easements and Permanent Easements.

UPDATED NOTICE TO OWNER: Due to parcel revisions, attached is an updated Notice to Owner reflecting the current sizes/locations of PS 728A/728B/728C and 828A/828B.

APPRAISAL REPORT: This is the County’s approved appraisal of Parcels PS 728A/728B/728C and PS 828A/828B, prepared by a State-Certified General Real Estate Appraiser, which is the basis for the County’s Written Offer.

At your earliest convenience, please contact me at (407) 427-2174 or rossanna@americanacquisition.com, to discuss the enclosed offer and the next step in the acquisition process.

Sincerely,

Rossanna Asencio
Consultant Right of Way Agent Enclosures as stated herein

711 North Sherrill Street – Suite B Tampa, Florida 33609-1109
Ph. 813-287-8191 – Fax 813-287-8272

Remington Community Development District, a unit of special purpose government
C/O Government MGMT Services 219 E. Livingston St.
Orlando, FL 32801-1508 Dear Property Owner,
Osceola County
STATEMENT OF OFFER

PROJECT NAME:	Partin Settlement Road PARCEL#:	PS 728A/728B/728C, 828A/828B
As you are probably aware, Osceola County is in the process of acquiring the needed right-of-way for the above referenced facility. A determination has been made that either a part, or all the property will be needed. A search of the Public Records of the County in which this property is situated has been made and it was determined that property is owned by you.

The interest being acquired in your property is:

PS Parcel 728A:  A 6,427 square foot Temporary Construction Easement, further described in attached Exhibit "A" PS Parcel 728B:  A 3,272 square foot Temporary Construction Easement, further described in attached Exhibit "A" PS Parcel 728C  A 2,562 square foot Temporary Construction Easement, further described in attached Exhibit "A" PS Parcel 828A:  A 1,928 square foot Permanent Easement, further described in attached Exhibit "A"
PS Parcel 828B:  A 147 square foot Permanent Easement, further described in attached Exhibit "A"

In addition, the following list will identify the buildings, structures, fixtures, and other improvements which are considered to be a part of the real property acquired, or personal property being acquired, if any:

PS Parcel 728A:	 2,915 SF Sidewalk- Includes Fine Grading, 3,512 SF Irrigation - Grass & Beds PS Parcel 728B:	80 Medium Bush/Shrub, 1,420 SF Irrigation - Grass & Beds
PS Parcel 728C:	1,470 SF Sidewalk - Includes Fine Grading, 1,092 SF Irrigation - Grass & Beds
PS Parcel 828A:		378 SF Asphalt Paving, 146 LF Concrete Curbing, 2 Directional/Parking Signs, 27 LF Stop Bar, 138 SF Pavement Striping/Hatching, 134 SF Sidewalk- Includes Fine Grading, 543 SF Grass/Sod, 14 Small Bush/Shrub, 64 Planting - Flower, 1,163 SF Irrigation - Grass & Beds
PS Parcel 828B:	65 SF Sidewalk - Includes Fine Grading, 82 SF Grass/Sod, 82 SF Irrigation - Grass & Beds The following items were excluded:
PS Parcel 728A:	3,512 SF Grass - to be replaced by roadway contractor, if damaged/disturbed, in as good or better condition
PS Parcel 728B:	1,410 SF Driveway/Parking Area, 100 LF Curbing, 1 Pavement Striping/Marking, 342 SF Sidewalk, 1 Sign, 940 SF Grass - to be replaced by roadway contractor, if damaged/disturbed, in as good or better condition
PS Parcel 728C:	1,092 SF Grass - to be replaced by roadway contractor, if damaged/disturbed, in as good or better condition
PS Parcel 828A:	1 Crosswalk & Signage, 650 SF Pavers, 2 Light Poles - to be replaced by roadway contractor, if damaged/disturbed, in as good or better condition
All other site improvements not located within PS Parcels 728A/728B/728C/828A/828B are excluded
You are further advised that the County's offer of just compensation for the property required for the construction of this facility is based on the Fair Market Value of the property and that the County's offer to you is not less than the approved appraised value of the property.

The following represents a summary of the County's offer to you, and the basis therefore:

	PS Parcel 728A/728B/728C	PS Parcel 828A/828B		
Land	$	9,800.00	2,400.00	
Improvements	$	49,300.00	4,500.00	
Real Estate Damages	$	0.00	22,600.00	
Total	$	59,100.00	29,500.00	
	Grand Total $88,600.00			

This Statement of Offer is not a contract; if you agree to accept this offer, you will be required to sign a Purchase Agreement.

Any additional information you may require can be obtained through the County's Representative, Rossanna Asencio, American Acquisition Group, LLC, (407) 427-2174 or rossanna@americanacquisition.com.

If that representative is not readily available, please contact:

Jorge L. Moreno, In-house Consultant, Assistant Right of Way & Asset Manager, 407-742-0534 or Jorge.Moreno@osceola.org

Sincerely,

Sally Myers
Osceola County Right of Way Manager 407-742-0502
sally.myers@osceola.org

cc:	Scott D. Clark, Esquire Clark & Albaugh, LLP
700 W. Morse Blvd., Suite 101 Winter Park, FL 32789

Legal Review

0u Z1i n/lt fY? ])y, 5Co  I I		
Type or Print Name	Date

Delivered By	Type or Print Name	Date

Receipt Acknowledged By

Enclosures:
Updated Notice to Owner Parcel Sketch
Appraisal
Type or Print Name	Date
DESCRIPTION
PS-728A
EXHIBIT "A" - PAGE 1 of 12

A portion of Tract "D", Remington - Phase 2, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 11, Pages 28 and 29, of the public records of Osceola County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows:

Beginning at the Southeast corner of Tract "D", Remington - Phase 2, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 11, Pages 28 and 29, of the public records of Osceola County, Florida, said point being the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence the following two (2) courses and distances along the North right of way line of Partin Settlement Road, per Florida Department of Transportation Right of Way map for State Road 91 (Turnpike Mainline), F.P. No. 436194-1: South 89°50'53" West, a distance of 535.58 feet; North 00·30'33" West, a distance of 12.00 feet; thence departing said North right of way line North 89"50'53" East, a distance of 535.65 feet, to a point on the West right of way line of Remington Boulevard per said Remington - Phase 2; thence South 00"09'05" East, a distance of 12.00 feet along said West right of way line to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Containing 6,427 square feet, more or less.

SURVEYOR'S REPORT:
Bearings shown hereon are based on the North right of way line of Partin Settlement Road per Florida Department of Transportation Right of Way map for State Road 91 (Turnpike Mainline), F.P. No. 436194-1, being South 89"50'53" West (assumed).

I hereby certify that the "Sketch of Description" of the above described property is true and correct to the best of my know/edge and belief as recently drawn under my direction and that it meets the Standards of Practice for Land Surveying Chapter 5J-17 requirements of Florida Administration Code.

OSCEOLA COUNTY
Chapter 5J-17, Florida Administrative	Code requires that a legal description drawing bear the notation that
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY.
REVISED: 6/24/2022
SHEET 1 OF 2
SEE SHEET 2 FOR SKETCH
SOUTHEASTERN SURVEYING AND MAPPIN	RPORATION
6500 Al,.....	-:,-­
Orl

JR.,
Registered Land Surveyor Number 728B
SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION
PS-728A
EXHIBIT "A" - PAGE 2 of 12

1" =100' GRAPHIC SCALE
0

100
I	iff}?
?;
I	I	I
I	:::,O>ifC)
zw	zLL. ?

LOT 24

LOT 23

LOT 22

LOT 21	LOT 20	LOT 19	LOT 18	LOT 17	LOT 16	LOT 15

:J
LOT 14	>-
?o  ?s
PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBE 20-25-30-4829-0001-00D0
REMINGTON COD OFFICIAL
?
-u..
i... 0	_c, ffi
RECORDS  BOOK  1674?,
PLAT 800K 16, PAGES 178 & 17?
af--uP:r:C.:l
PAGE 15, 41
 	
J_ 1
2
f-- f-
??	TRACT "D"
REMINGTON -	PHASE 2	?
LJ	PLAT BOOK 11, PAGES 28 & 29	L4
L2	NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE (BASIS OF BEARINGS)

PARTIN SEITLEMENT ROAD
RIGHT OF WAY VARIES
PER FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY MAP FOR STATE ROAD 91 (TURNPIKE MAINLINE), F.P. NO. 436194-1
L1	POINT OF BEGINNING
SOUTHfAST CORNER OF TRACT "D" PLAT BOOK 11, PAGE S 28 & 29	

LINE TABLE
LINE #	BEARING	LENGTH
L1	S89"50'53''W 535.58'
L2	N00"30'33''W 12.00'
L3	N89"50'53"E 535.65'
L4	soo·o9•05"E	12.00'

Drawing No. 64576042 - PS 728A Job No. 64576
Date: JANUARY 24, 2022
SHEET 2 OF 2
See Sheet 1 for Description

THIS IS NOT A SURVEY.
NOT VALID WITHOUT SHEET 1 THROUGH 2

SOUTHEASTERN SURVEYING AND MAPPING CORPORATION
6500 All American Boulevard Orlando, Florida 32810-4350
(407) 292-8580
Certification Number LB2108
e-mail:  info@southeasternsurveying.com
DESCRIPTION
PS-728B
EXHIBIT "A" - PAGE 3 of 12

A portion of Tract "C", Remington - Phase 2, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 11, Pages 28 and 29, of the public records of Osceola County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows:

Commencing at the Southeast corner of Tract "D", Remington - Phase 2, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 11, Pages 28 and 29, of the public records of Osceola County, Florida; thence North 00"09'05" West, a distance of 15.00 feet along the West right of way line of Remington Boulevard per said Remington - Phase 2 to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing along said West right of way line, North 00"09'05" West, a distance of 25.00 feet; thence departing said West right of way line North 89"50'5.3" East, a distance of 1.30.00 feet to a point on the East right of way line of said Remington Boulevard; thence South 00"09'05" East, a distance of 25..34 feet along said East right of way line; thence departing said East right of way line North 90"00'00" West, a distance of 1.30.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Containing .3,272 square feet, more or less.

SURVEYOR'S REPORT:
Bearings shown hereon are based on the North right of way line of Partin Settlement Road per Florida Department of Transportation Right of Way map for State Road 91 (Turnpike Mainline), F.P. No. 436194-1, being South 89"50'53" West (assumed).

I hereby certify that the "Sketch of Description" of the above described property is true and correct to the best of my know/edge and belief as recently drawn under my direction and that it meets the Standards of Practice for Land Surveying Chapter 5J-17 requirements of Florida Administration Code.

OSCEOLA COUNTY
Chapter 5J-17, Florida Administrative	Code requires that a legal description drawing bear the notation that
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY.
REVISED: 6/24/2022
SHEET 1 OF 2
SEE SHEET 2 FOR SKETCH
SOUTHEASTERN SURVEYING AND MAPPIN	RPORATION
6500 Al,..... -·---:,-­
Orl

JR.,
Registered Land Surveyor Number 728B
SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION
PS-7288
EXHIBIT "A" - PAGE 4 of 12

.-
-.;I­ LO

?
1" = 40' GRAPHIC SCALE
0	40

LOT 14

SOMERSET
PLAT BOOK 16, PAGES 178 & 179

REMINGTON - PHASE 2 PLAT BOOK 11, PAGES 28 & 29
PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 20-25-30-4829-0001-00DO
REMINGTON CDD OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1674, PAGE 1541
TRACT "D"
POINT OF BEGINNING

f--u
?

?

:::;
?

.....

REMINGTON BOULEVARD
RIGHT OF WAY VARIES
PER PLAT BOOK 11, PAGES 28 & 29
TRACT "C"
Nag•so'53"E	130.00'

N9o·oo'oo"w	130.00'

? ----?

?	TRACT "E"

POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
SOUTI-IEAST CORNER OF TRACT "D• PLAT BOOK 11, PAGES 28 & 29

PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 20-25-30-4829-0001-00EO
REMINGTON CDD OFFICIAL RECORDS
BOOK 1674, PAGE 1541

-(£­
LINE TABLE
PARTIN SETTLEMENT ROAD
RIGHT OF WAY VARIES
PER FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT
OF WAY MAP FOR STATE ROAD 91 (TURNPIKE MAINLINE), F.P. NO. 436194-1

Drawing No. 64576044 - PS 728B Job No. 64576
Date: JANUARY 24, 2022
SOUTHEASTERN SURVEYING AND MAPPING CORPORATION
6500 All American Boulevard Orlando, Florida 32810-4350
(407) 292-8580
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY.	Certification  Number  LB2108
SHEET 2 OF 2
See Sheet 1 for Description
NOT VALID WITHOUT SHEET 1 THROUGH 2
e-mail:  info@southeasternsurveying.com
DESCRIPTION
PS-728C
EXHIBIT "A" - PAGE 5 of 12

A portion of Tract "E", Remington - Phase 2, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 11, Pages 28 and 29, of the public records of Osceola County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows:

Commencing at the Southwest corner of Tract "E", Remington - Phase 2, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 11, Pages 28 and 29, of the public records of Osceola County, Florida; thence North 00"09'05" West, a distance of 10.00 feet along
the East right of way line of Remington Boulevard per said Remington - Phase 2; thence
departing said East right of way line North 89"50'53" East, a distance of 6.35 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence the following tow (2) courses and distances: North 89"50'53" East, a distance of 127.03 feet; South 88"02'46" East, a distance of 272.16 feet to a point on the North right of way line of Partin Settlement Road, per Florida Department of Transportation Right of Way map for State Road 91 (Turnpike Mainline), F.P. No.
436194-1; thence South 89"50'53" West, a distance of 385.35 feet along said North right of way line; thence departing said North right of way line North 53"55'08" West, a distance of 16.92 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Containing 2,562 square feet, more or less.

SURVEYOR'S REPORT:
Bearings shown hereon are based on the North right of way line of Partin Settlement Road per Florida Department of Transportation Right of Way map for State Road 91 (Turnpike Mainline), F.P. No. 436194-1, being South 89"50'53" West (assumed).

I hereby certify that the "Sketch of Description" of the above described property is true and correct to the best of my know/edge and belief as recently drawn under my direction and that it meets the Standards of Practice for Land Surveying Chapter 5J-17 requirements of Florida Administration Code.

OSCEOLA COUNTY
Chapter 5J-17, Florida Administrative	Code requires that a legal description drawing bear the notation that
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY.
REVISED: 6/24/2022 SHEET 1 OF 2
SEE SHEET 2 FOR SKETCH
SOUTHEASTERN SURVEYING AND MAPPIN	RPORATION
6500 Al,.....	-:,-­
Orl

JR.,
Registered Land Surveyor Number 728B
SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION
PS-728C
EXHIBIT "A" - PAGE 6 of 12

1" = 60' GRAPHIC SCALE
0	60

PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 20-25-30-4829-0001-00L2
EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF OSCEOLA INC OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1674, PAGE 1541

REMINGTON - PHASE 2 PLAT BOOK 11, PAGES 28 & 29

TRACT "E"	PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 20-25-30-4829-0001-00EO
REMINGTON CDD OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1674,

PAGE 1541

sa9•50' 53''W	385.35' POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT "E"
PLAT BOOK 11, PAGES 28 & 29
-1-

LINE TABLE
LINE #	BEARING	LENGTH
L1	N00'09'05"W  10.00'
L2	N89"50'53"E	6.35'
L3	N53"55'08"W  16.92'

NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE (BASIS OF BEARINGS)
PARTIN SETTLEMENT ROAD
RIGHT OF WAY VARIES
PER FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY MAP FOR STATE ROAD 91 (TURNPIKE MAINLINE), F.P. NO. 436194-1

Drawing No. 64576046 - PS 728C Job No. 64576
Date: JANUARY 24, 2022
SHEET 2 OF 2
See Sheet 1 for Description

SOUTHEASTERN SURVEYING AND MAPPING CORPORATION
6500 All American Boulevard Orlando, Florida 32810-4350
(407) 292-8580
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY.	Certification Number LB2108
DESCRIPTION
PS-828A
EXHIBIT "A" - PAGE 7 of 12

A portion of Tract "C", Remington - Phase 2, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 11, Pages 28 and 29, of the public records of Osceola County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows:

Beginning at the Southeast corner of Tract "D", Remington - Phase 2, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 11, Pages 28 and 29, of the public records of Osceola County, Florida, said point being the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 00·09'05" West, a distance of 15.00 feet along the West right of way line of Remington Boulevard per said Remington - Phase 2 ; thence departing said West right of way line North 90"00'00" East, a distance of 130.00 feet to a point on the East right of way line of said Remington Boulevard; thence South 00"09'05" East, a distance of 14.66 feet along said East right of way line, to a point on the North right of way line of Partin
Settlement Road, per Florida Department of Transportation Right of Way map for State
Road 91 (Turnpike Mainline), F.P. No. 436194-1; thence South 89"50'53" West, a distance of 130.00 feet along said North right of way line to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Containing 1,928 square feet, more or less.

SURVEYOR'S REPORT:
Bearings shown hereon are based on the North right of way line of Partin Settlement Road per Florida Department of Transportation Right of Way map for State Road 91 (Turnpike Mainline), F.P. No. 436194-1, being South 89"50'53" West (assumed).

I hereby certify that the "Sketch of Description" of the above described property is true and correct to the best of my know/edge and belief as recently drawn under my direction and that it meets the Standards of Practice for Land Surveying Chapter 5J-17 requirements of Florida Administration Code.

OSCEOLA COUNTY
Chapter 5J-17, Florida Administrative	Code requires that a legal description drawing bear the notation that
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY.
REVISED: 6/24/2022
SHEET 1 OF 2
SEE SHEET 2 FOR SKETCH
SOUTHEASTERN SURVEYING AND MAPPIN	RPORATION
6500 Al?  7'--
0rl

JR.,
Registered Land Surveyor Number 728B
SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION
PS-828A
EXHIBIT "A" - PAGE 8 of 12

.-
-.;I­ LO.-

1" = 40' GRAPHIC SCALE
0	40

LOT 14

SOMERSET
PlAT BOOK 16, PAGES 178 & 179

REMINGTON - PHASE 2
REMINGTON BOULEVARD
RIGHT OF WAY VARIES

(.!)		
a::
PlAT BOOK 11, PAGES 28 & 29
PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 20-25-30-4829-0001-00DO
REMINGTON COD OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1674, PAGE 1541

......--'
PER PLAT BOOK 11, PAGES 28 & 29	Iii
?
N9o·oo'oo"E	1.30.00'
TRACT "E"
-	--
TR-AC-T "D"	I
NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE (BASIS OF BEARINGS)	sag•so'sJ''W	1.30.00'	/
POINT OF BEGINNING
SOUTI-IEAST CORNER OF TRACT "D• PLAT BOOK 11, PAGES 28 & 29

PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER/ 20-25-30-4829-0001-00EO
REMINGTON COD OFFICIAL RECORDS
BOOK 1674, PAGE 1541

-(£­	-
LINE TABLE
LINE #	BEARING	LENGTH
L1	N00"09'05"W  15.00'
L2	S00"09'05"E  14.66'
PARTIN SETTLEMENT ROAD
RIGHT OF WAY VARIES
PER FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT
OF WAY MAP FOR STATE ROAD 91 (TURNPIKE MAINLINE), F.P. NO. 436194-1

Drawing No. 64576043 - PS 828A Job No. 64576
Date: JANUARY 24, 2022
SHEET 2 OF 2
See Sheet 1 for Description

THIS IS NOT A SURVEY.
NOT VALID WITHOUT SHEET 1 THROUGH 2

SOUTHEASTERN SURVEYING AND MAPPING CORPORATION
6500 All American Boulevard Orlando, Florida 32810-4350
(407) 292-8580
Certification Number LB2108
e-mail:  info@southeasternsurveying.com
DESCRIPTION
PS-828B
EXHIBIT "A" - PAGE 9 of 12

A portion of Tract "E", Remington - Phase 2, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 11, Pages 28 and 29, of the public records of Osceola County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows:

Beginning at the Southwest corner of Tract "E", Remington - Phase 2, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 11, Pages 28 and 29, of the public records of Osceola County, Florida, said point being the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 00·09'05" West, a distance of 14.66 feet along the East right of way line of Remington Boulevard per said Remington - Phase 2; thence departing said East right of way line South 53"55'08" East, a distance of 24. 79 feet to a point on the North right of way line of Partin Settlement Road, per Florida Department of Transportation Right of Way map for State Road 91 (Turnpike Mainline), F.P. No. 436194-1; thence South 89"50'53" West, a distance of 20.00 feet along said North right of way line to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Containing 147 square feet, more or less.

SURVEYOR'S REPORT:
Bearings shown hereon are based on the North right of way line of Partin Settlement Road per Florida Department of Transportation Right of Way map for State Road 91 (Turnpike Mainline), F.P. No. 436194-1, being South 89"50'53" West (assumed).

I hereby certify that the "Sketch of Description" of the above described property is true and correct to the best of my know/edge and belief as recently drawn under my direction and that it meets the Standards of Practice for Land Surveying Chapter 5J-17 requirements of Florida Administration Code.

OSCEOLA COUNTY
Chapter 5J-17, Florida Administrative	Code requires that a legal description drawing bear the notation that
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY.
REVISED: 6/24/2022
SHEET 1  OF 2
SEE SHEET 2 FOR SKETCH
SOUTHEASTERN SURVEYING AND MAPPIN	RPORATION
6500 Al	7'--
0rl

JR.,
Registered Land Surveyor Number 728B
SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION
PS-8288

1" = 40' GRAPHIC SCALE
0	40
EXHIBIT "A" - PAGE 10 of 12

REMINGTON - PHASE 2 PLAT BOOK 11, PAGES 28 &: 29

PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 20-25-30-4829-0001-00L2
EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF OSCEOLA INC OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1674, PAGE 1541

REMINGTON BOULEVARD
RIGHT OF WAY VARIES
PER PLAT BOOK 11, PAGES 28 & 29

TRACT "E"
	 	 -

PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 20-25-30-4829-0001-00EO
REMINGTON COD OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1674, PAGE 1541

----;:ioRTH RIGHT OF WAYLINE (BASIS OF BEARINGS)
POINT OF BEGINNING SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT "E" PLAT BOOK 11, PAGES 28 & 29

--	--
LINE TABLE
L3

-(£  --	--	--
PARTIN SEITLEMENT ROAD
RIGHT OF WAY VARIES
PER FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT
OF WAY MAP FOR STATE ROAD 91 (TURNPIKE MAINLINE), F.P. NO. 4J6194-1

Drawing No. 64576045- PS 828B Job No. 64576
Date: JANUARY 24, 2022
SHEET 2 OF 2
See Sheet 1 for Description

THIS IS NOT A SURVEY.
NOT VALID WITHOUT SHEET 1 THROUGH 2

SOUTHEASTERN SURVEYING AND MAPPING CORPORATION
6500 All American Boulevard Orlando, Florida 32810-4350
(407) 292-8580
Certification Number LB2108
e-mail:  info@southeasternsurveying.com
EXHIBIT “A” – PAGE 11 of 12 PS PARCEL 728A
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
PS Parcel 728A is being acquired as a temporary, non-exclusive easement with full authority to enter upon the lands described in attached Exhibit “A" for a temporary construction easement for side slope extending beyond sidewalk and for removal of existing sidewalk outside of Right-of-Way. At all times during construction the GRANTEE will maintain access to the GRANTOR’S remaining lands.
After the construction on the Parcel is completed the GRANTEE shall restore the Parcel to a condition as good as or better than the one existing before being disturbed by the GRANTEE.
This easement shall expire upon the completion of the construction on the project adjacent to the lands described in attached Exhibit “A” or after five (5) years, whichever occurs first.
PS PARCEL 728B TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
PS Parcel 728B is being acquired as a temporary, non-exclusive easement with full authority to enter upon the lands described in attached Exhibit “A” for a temporary construction easement for construction of new curb returns and side street tie-down. At all times during construction the GRANTEE will maintain access to the GRANTOR’S remaining lands.
After the construction on the Parcel is completed the GRANTEE shall restore the Parcel to a condition as good as or better than the one existing before being disturbed by the GRANTEE.
This easement shall expire upon the completion of the construction on the project adjacent to the lands described in attached Exhibit “A” or after five (5) years, whichever occurs first.
PS PARCEL 728C TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
PS Parcel 728C is being acquired as a temporary, non-exclusive easement with full authority to enter upon the lands described in attached Exhibit “A” for a temporary construction easement for side slope extending beyond sidewalk and for removal of existing sidewalk outside of Right-of-Way. At all times during construction the GRANTEE will maintain access to the GRANTOR’S remaining lands.
After the construction on the Parcel is completed the GRANTEE shall restore the Parcel to a condition as good as or better than the one existing before being disturbed by the GRANTEE.
This easement shall expire upon the completion of the construction on the project adjacent to the lands described in attached Exhibit “A” or after five (5) years, whichever occurs first.
EXHIBIT “A” – PAGE 12 of 12 PS PARCEL 828A PERMANENT EASEMENT
PS PARCEL 828A: THE INTEREST BEING ACQUIRED IS A PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR ROADWAY, TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE.
PS PARCEL 828B PERMANENT EASEMENT
PS PARCEL 828B: THE INTEREST BEING ACQUIRED IS A PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR ROADWAY, TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE.

Osceola County
PURCHASE AGREEMENT

PROJECT NAME:	 Partin Settlement Road		

PARCEL #:	PS 728A/728B/728C,
 828A/828B		

Seller:	Remington Community Development District, a unit of special purpose government
	C/O Government MGMT Services, 219 E. Livingston St., Orlando, FL 32801-1508	

Buyer:	 Osceola County, 1 Courthouse Square, Suite 3100, Kissimmee, Florida 34741		

Buyer and Seller hereby agree that Seller shall sell, and Buyer shall buy the following described property pursuant to the following terms and conditions:

Description of Property
a.	Estate being purchased:	Fee Simple	X	Permanent Easement	X	Temporary Easement	Leasehold	

b.	Real property described as:	PS Parcel 728A:	A 6,427 square foot Temporary Construction Easement, further
described in attached Exhibit “A”	
		PS Parcel 728B:	A 3,272 square foot Temporary Construction Easement, further
described in attached Exhibit “A”	
		PS Parcel 728C	A 2,562 square foot Temporary Construction Easement, further
described in attached Exhibit “A”	
		PS Parcel 828A:	A 1,928 square foot Permanent Easement, further described in
attached Exhibit “A”	
		PS Parcel 828B:	A 147 square foot Permanent Easement, further described in
attached Exhibit “A”	

c.	Personal property:	 N/A		

Buildings, structures, fixtures and other improvements owned by others:	 N/A		
These items are NOT included in this agreement. A separate offer is being, or has been made, for these items.

Purchase Price
a.	Real Property				
	Land	1.	$	12,200.00	
	Improvements	2.	$	53,800.00	
	Real Estate Damages	3.	$	22,600.00	
	(Severance/Cost-to-Cure)				
	Total Real Property	4.	$	88,600.00	
b.	Total of Other Costs	5.	$	0.00	
	List: 			$	0.00	
	Total Purchase Price (Add Lines 4 and 5)		$	88,600.00	
c.	Portion of Total Purchase Price to be paid to Seller by Buyer at Closing		$	88,600.00	
d.	Portion of Total Purchase Price to be paid to Seller
by Buyer upon surrender of possession		$	0.00	

Conditions and Limitations
Seller is responsible for all taxes due on the property up to, but not including the day of closing.
Seller is responsible for delivering marketable title to Buyer. Marketable title shall be determined according to applicable title standards adopted by the Florida Bar in accordance with Florida Law subject only to those exceptions that are acceptable to Buyer. At least 15 days prior to Closing a title insurance commitment issued by a Florida licensed title insurer, with legible copies of instruments listed as exceptions thereto, and, after Closing, an owner's policy of title insurance shall be obtained and delivered to Buyer, at Buyer's expense. Unless otherwise agreed in writing, Buyer will obtain the title insurance from a vendor of its choice. Seller shall be liable for any encumbrances not disclosed in the public records or arising after closing as a result of action of the Seller.

Seller shall maintain the property described in Section I of this agreement until the day of closing. The property shall be maintained in the same condition existing on the date of this agreement, except for reasonable wear and tear.

Any occupancy of the property described in Section I of this agreement by Seller extending beyond the day of closing must be pursuant to a lease from Buyer to Seller.

The property described in Section I of this agreement is being acquired by Buyer for transportation purposes under threat of condemnation pursuant to Florida Statutes.

Seller agrees that the real property described in Section I of this agreement shall be conveyed to Buyer by conveyance instrument(s) acceptable to Buyer.

Seller and buyer agree that this agreement represents the full and final agreement for the herein described sale and purchase and no other agreements or representations, unless incorporated into this agreement, shall be binding on the parties.

Closing Date

The closing will occur no later than 60 days after Final County Acceptance.

Typewritten or Handwritten Provisions
Any typewritten or handwritten provisions inserted into or attached to this agreement as addenda must be initialed by both Seller and Buyer.

	There is an addendum to this agreement. Page			Is made a part of this agreement.	
X	There is not an addendum to this agreement.		

Seller and Buyer hereby acknowledge and agree that their signatures as Seller and Buyer below constitute their acceptance of this agreement as a binding real estate contract.

It is mutually acknowledged that this Purchase Agreement is subject to Final County Acceptance by Buyer pursuant to Florida Statutes. A closing shall not be conducted prior to 30 days from the date this agreement is signed by Seller and Buyer to allow public review of the transaction. Final County Acceptance shall not be withheld by Buyer absent evidence of fraud, coercion or undue influence involving this agreement. Final County Acceptance shall be evidenced by the signature of Buyer in Section VII of this agreement.

Seller(s)			Buyer		
			Osceola County		
Signature	Date				
			BY:		
Type or print name			Signature	Date	
Signature	Date		Type or print name and title		
Type or print name					

Final County Acceptance

The Buyer has granted Final County Acceptance this	day of	,	.	

BY: 		 		
Signature	Type or print name and title	

Legal Review: 		
Date	
Type or print name and title	
DESCRIPTION
PS-728A
EXHIBIT "A" - PAGE 1 of 12

A portion of Tract "D", Remington - Phase 2, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 11, Pages 28 and 29, of the public records of Osceola County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows:

Beginning at the Southeast corner of Tract "D", Remington - Phase 2, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 11, Pages 28 and 29, of the public records of Osceola County, Florida, said point being the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence the following two (2) courses and distances along the North right of way line of Partin Settlement Road, per Florida Department of Transportation Right of Way map for State Road 91 (Turnpike Mainline), F.P. No. 436194-1: South 89°50'53" West, a distance of 535.58 feet; North 00·30'33" West, a distance of 12.00 feet; thence departing said North right of way line North 89"50'53" East, a distance of 535.65 feet, to a point on the West right of way line of Remington Boulevard per said Remington - Phase 2; thence South 00"09'05" East, a distance of 12.00 feet along said West right of way line to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Containing 6,427 square feet, more or less.

SURVEYOR'S REPORT:
Bearings shown hereon are based on the North right of way line of Partin Settlement Road per Florida Department of Transportation Right of Way map for State Road 91 (Turnpike Mainline), F.P. No. 436194-1, being South 89"50'53" West (assumed).

I hereby certify that the "Sketch of Description" of the above described property is true and correct to the best of my know/edge and belief as recently drawn under my direction and that it meets the Standards of Practice for Land Surveying Chapter 5J-17 requirements of Florida Administration Code.

OSCEOLA COUNTY
Chapter 5J-17, Florida Administrative	Code requires that a legal description drawing bear the notation that
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY.
REVISED: 6/24/2022
SHEET 1 OF 2
SEE SHEET 2 FOR SKETCH
SOUTHEASTERN SURVEYING AND MAPPIN	RPORATION
6500 Al,.....	-:,-­
Orl

JR.,
Registered Land Surveyor Number 728B
SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION
PS-728A
EXHIBIT "A" - PAGE 2 of 12

1" =100' GRAPHIC SCALE
0

100
I	iff}?
?;
I	I	I
I	:::,O>ifC)
zw	zLL. ?

LOT 24

LOT 23

LOT 22

LOT 21	LOT 20	LOT 19	LOT 18	LOT 17	LOT 16	LOT 15

:J
LOT 14	>-
?o  ?s
PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBE 20-25-30-4829-0001-00D0
REMINGTON COD OFFICIAL
?
-u..
i... 0	_c, ffi
RECORDS  BOOK  1674?,
PLAT 800K 16, PAGES 178 & 17?
af--uP:r:C.:l
PAGE 15, 41
 	
J_ 1
2
f-- f-
??	TRACT "D"
REMINGTON -	PHASE 2	?
LJ	PLAT BOOK 11, PAGES 28 & 29	L4
L2	NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE (BASIS OF BEARINGS)

PARTIN SEITLEMENT ROAD
RIGHT OF WAY VARIES
PER FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY MAP FOR STATE ROAD 91 (TURNPIKE MAINLINE), F.P. NO. 436194-1
L1	POINT OF BEGINNING
SOUTHfAST CORNER OF TRACT "D" PLAT BOOK 11, PAGE S 28 & 29	

LINE TABLE
LINE #	BEARING	LENGTH
L1	S89"50'53''W 535.58'
L2	N00"30'33''W 12.00'
L3	N89"50'53"E 535.65'
L4	soo·o9•05"E	12.00'

Drawing No. 64576042 - PS 728A Job No. 64576
Date: JANUARY 24, 2022
SHEET 2 OF 2
See Sheet 1 for Description

THIS IS NOT A SURVEY.
NOT VALID WITHOUT SHEET 1 THROUGH 2

SOUTHEASTERN SURVEYING AND MAPPING CORPORATION
6500 All American Boulevard Orlando, Florida 32810-4350
(407) 292-8580
Certification Number LB2108
e-mail:  info@southeasternsurveying.com
DESCRIPTION
PS-728B
EXHIBIT "A" - PAGE 3 of 12

A portion of Tract "C", Remington - Phase 2, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 11, Pages 28 and 29, of the public records of Osceola County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows:

Commencing at the Southeast corner of Tract "D", Remington - Phase 2, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 11, Pages 28 and 29, of the public records of Osceola County, Florida; thence North 00"09'05" West, a distance of 15.00 feet along the West right of way line of Remington Boulevard per said Remington - Phase 2 to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing along said West right of way line, North 00"09'05" West, a distance of 25.00 feet; thence departing said West right of way line North 89"50'5.3" East, a distance of 1.30.00 feet to a point on the East right of way line of said Remington Boulevard; thence South 00"09'05" East, a distance of 25..34 feet along said East right of way line; thence departing said East right of way line North 90"00'00" West, a distance of 1.30.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Containing .3,272 square feet, more or less.

SURVEYOR'S REPORT:
Bearings shown hereon are based on the North right of way line of Partin Settlement Road per Florida Department of Transportation Right of Way map for State Road 91 (Turnpike Mainline), F.P. No. 436194-1, being South 89"50'53" West (assumed).

I hereby certify that the "Sketch of Description" of the above described property is true and correct to the best of my know/edge and belief as recently drawn under my direction and that it meets the Standards of Practice for Land Surveying Chapter 5J-17 requirements of Florida Administration Code.

OSCEOLA COUNTY
Chapter 5J-17, Florida Administrative	Code requires that a legal description drawing bear the notation that
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY.
REVISED: 6/24/2022
SHEET 1 OF 2
SEE SHEET 2 FOR SKETCH
SOUTHEASTERN SURVEYING AND MAPPIN	RPORATION
6500 Al,..... -·---:,-­
Orl

JR.,
Registered Land Surveyor Number 728B
SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION
PS-7288
EXHIBIT "A" - PAGE 4 of 12

.-
-.;I­ LO

?
1" = 40' GRAPHIC SCALE
0	40

LOT 14

SOMERSET
PLAT BOOK 16, PAGES 178 & 179

REMINGTON - PHASE 2 PLAT BOOK 11, PAGES 28 & 29
PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 20-25-30-4829-0001-00DO
REMINGTON CDD OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1674, PAGE 1541
TRACT "D"
POINT OF BEGINNING

f--u
?

?

:::;
?

.....

REMINGTON BOULEVARD
RIGHT OF WAY VARIES
PER PLAT BOOK 11, PAGES 28 & 29
TRACT "C"
Nag•so'53"E	130.00'

N9o·oo'oo"w	130.00'

? ----?

?	TRACT "E"

POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
SOUTI-IEAST CORNER OF TRACT "D• PLAT BOOK 11, PAGES 28 & 29

PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 20-25-30-4829-0001-00EO
REMINGTON CDD OFFICIAL RECORDS
BOOK 1674, PAGE 1541

-(£­
LINE TABLE
PARTIN SETTLEMENT ROAD
RIGHT OF WAY VARIES
PER FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT
OF WAY MAP FOR STATE ROAD 91 (TURNPIKE MAINLINE), F.P. NO. 436194-1

Drawing No. 64576044 - PS 728B Job No. 64576
Date: JANUARY 24, 2022
SOUTHEASTERN SURVEYING AND MAPPING CORPORATION
6500 All American Boulevard Orlando, Florida 32810-4350
(407) 292-8580
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY.	Certification  Number  LB2108
SHEET 2 OF 2
See Sheet 1 for Description
NOT VALID WITHOUT SHEET 1 THROUGH 2
e-mail:  info@southeasternsurveying.com
DESCRIPTION
PS-728C
EXHIBIT "A" - PAGE 5 of 12

A portion of Tract "E", Remington - Phase 2, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 11, Pages 28 and 29, of the public records of Osceola County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows:

Commencing at the Southwest corner of Tract "E", Remington - Phase 2, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 11, Pages 28 and 29, of the public records of Osceola County, Florida; thence North 00"09'05" West, a distance of 10.00 feet along
the East right of way line of Remington Boulevard per said Remington - Phase 2; thence
departing said East right of way line North 89"50'53" East, a distance of 6.35 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence the following tow (2) courses and distances: North 89"50'53" East, a distance of 127.03 feet; South 88"02'46" East, a distance of 272.16 feet to a point on the North right of way line of Partin Settlement Road, per Florida Department of Transportation Right of Way map for State Road 91 (Turnpike Mainline), F.P. No.
436194-1; thence South 89"50'53" West, a distance of 385.35 feet along said North right of way line; thence departing said North right of way line North 53"55'08" West, a distance of 16.92 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Containing 2,562 square feet, more or less.

SURVEYOR'S REPORT:
Bearings shown hereon are based on the North right of way line of Partin Settlement Road per Florida Department of Transportation Right of Way map for State Road 91 (Turnpike Mainline), F.P. No. 436194-1, being South 89"50'53" West (assumed).

I hereby certify that the "Sketch of Description" of the above described property is true and correct to the best of my know/edge and belief as recently drawn under my direction and that it meets the Standards of Practice for Land Surveying Chapter 5J-17 requirements of Florida Administration Code.

OSCEOLA COUNTY
Chapter 5J-17, Florida Administrative	Code requires that a legal description drawing bear the notation that
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY.
REVISED: 6/24/2022 SHEET 1 OF 2
SEE SHEET 2 FOR SKETCH
SOUTHEASTERN SURVEYING AND MAPPIN	RPORATION
6500 Al,.....	-:,-­
Orl

JR.,
Registered Land Surveyor Number 728B
SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION
PS-728C
EXHIBIT "A" - PAGE 6 of 12

1" = 60' GRAPHIC SCALE
0	60

PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 20-25-30-4829-0001-00L2
EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF OSCEOLA INC OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1674, PAGE 1541

REMINGTON - PHASE 2 PLAT BOOK 11, PAGES 28 & 29

TRACT "E"	PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 20-25-30-4829-0001-00EO
REMINGTON CDD OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1674,

PAGE 1541

sa9•50' 53''W	385.35' POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT "E"
PLAT BOOK 11, PAGES 28 & 29
-1-

LINE TABLE
LINE #	BEARING	LENGTH
L1	N00'09'05"W  10.00'
L2	N89"50'53"E	6.35'
L3	N53"55'08"W  16.92'

NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE (BASIS OF BEARINGS)
PARTIN SETTLEMENT ROAD
RIGHT OF WAY VARIES
PER FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY MAP FOR STATE ROAD 91 (TURNPIKE MAINLINE), F.P. NO. 436194-1

Drawing No. 64576046 - PS 728C Job No. 64576
Date: JANUARY 24, 2022
SHEET 2 OF 2
See Sheet 1 for Description

SOUTHEASTERN SURVEYING AND MAPPING CORPORATION
6500 All American Boulevard Orlando, Florida 32810-4350
(407) 292-8580
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY.	Certification Number LB2108
DESCRIPTION
PS-828A
EXHIBIT "A" - PAGE 7 of 12

A portion of Tract "C", Remington - Phase 2, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 11, Pages 28 and 29, of the public records of Osceola County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows:

Beginning at the Southeast corner of Tract "D", Remington - Phase 2, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 11, Pages 28 and 29, of the public records of Osceola County, Florida, said point being the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 00·09'05" West, a distance of 15.00 feet along the West right of way line of Remington Boulevard per said Remington - Phase 2 ; thence departing said West right of way line North 90"00'00" East, a distance of 130.00 feet to a point on the East right of way line of said Remington Boulevard; thence South 00"09'05" East, a distance of 14.66 feet along said East right of way line, to a point on the North right of way line of Partin
Settlement Road, per Florida Department of Transportation Right of Way map for State
Road 91 (Turnpike Mainline), F.P. No. 436194-1; thence South 89"50'53" West, a distance of 130.00 feet along said North right of way line to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Containing 1,928 square feet, more or less.

SURVEYOR'S REPORT:
Bearings shown hereon are based on the North right of way line of Partin Settlement Road per Florida Department of Transportation Right of Way map for State Road 91 (Turnpike Mainline), F.P. No. 436194-1, being South 89"50'53" West (assumed).

I hereby certify that the "Sketch of Description" of the above described property is true and correct to the best of my know/edge and belief as recently drawn under my direction and that it meets the Standards of Practice for Land Surveying Chapter 5J-17 requirements of Florida Administration Code.

OSCEOLA COUNTY
Chapter 5J-17, Florida Administrative	Code requires that a legal description drawing bear the notation that
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY.
REVISED: 6/24/2022
SHEET 1 OF 2
SEE SHEET 2 FOR SKETCH
SOUTHEASTERN SURVEYING AND MAPPIN	RPORATION
6500 Al?  7'--
0rl

JR.,
Registered Land Surveyor Number 728B
SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION
PS-828A
EXHIBIT "A" - PAGE 8 of 12

.-
-.;I­ LO.-

1" = 40' GRAPHIC SCALE
0	40

LOT 14

SOMERSET
PlAT BOOK 16, PAGES 178 & 179

REMINGTON - PHASE 2
REMINGTON BOULEVARD
RIGHT OF WAY VARIES

(.!)		
a::
PlAT BOOK 11, PAGES 28 & 29
PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 20-25-30-4829-0001-00DO
REMINGTON COD OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1674, PAGE 1541

......--'
PER PLAT BOOK 11, PAGES 28 & 29	Iii
?
N9o·oo'oo"E	1.30.00'
TRACT "E"
-	--
TR-AC-T "D"	I
NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE (BASIS OF BEARINGS)	sag•so'sJ''W	1.30.00'	/
POINT OF BEGINNING
SOUTI-IEAST CORNER OF TRACT "D• PLAT BOOK 11, PAGES 28 & 29

PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER/ 20-25-30-4829-0001-00EO
REMINGTON COD OFFICIAL RECORDS
BOOK 1674, PAGE 1541

-(£­	-
LINE TABLE
LINE #	BEARING	LENGTH
L1	N00"09'05"W  15.00'
L2	S00"09'05"E  14.66'
PARTIN SETTLEMENT ROAD
RIGHT OF WAY VARIES
PER FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT
OF WAY MAP FOR STATE ROAD 91 (TURNPIKE MAINLINE), F.P. NO. 436194-1

Drawing No. 64576043 - PS 828A Job No. 64576
Date: JANUARY 24, 2022
SHEET 2 OF 2
See Sheet 1 for Description

THIS IS NOT A SURVEY.
NOT VALID WITHOUT SHEET 1 THROUGH 2

SOUTHEASTERN SURVEYING AND MAPPING CORPORATION
6500 All American Boulevard Orlando, Florida 32810-4350
(407) 292-8580
Certification Number LB2108
e-mail:  info@southeasternsurveying.com
DESCRIPTION
PS-828B
EXHIBIT "A" - PAGE 9 of 12

A portion of Tract "E", Remington - Phase 2, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 11, Pages 28 and 29, of the public records of Osceola County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows:

Beginning at the Southwest corner of Tract "E", Remington - Phase 2, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 11, Pages 28 and 29, of the public records of Osceola County, Florida, said point being the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 00·09'05" West, a distance of 14.66 feet along the East right of way line of Remington Boulevard per said Remington - Phase 2; thence departing said East right of way line South 53"55'08" East, a distance of 24. 79 feet to a point on the North right of way line of Partin Settlement Road, per Florida Department of Transportation Right of Way map for State Road 91 (Turnpike Mainline), F.P. No. 436194-1; thence South 89"50'53" West, a distance of 20.00 feet along said North right of way line to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Containing 147 square feet, more or less.

SURVEYOR'S REPORT:
Bearings shown hereon are based on the North right of way line of Partin Settlement Road per Florida Department of Transportation Right of Way map for State Road 91 (Turnpike Mainline), F.P. No. 436194-1, being South 89"50'53" West (assumed).

I hereby certify that the "Sketch of Description" of the above described property is true and correct to the best of my know/edge and belief as recently drawn under my direction and that it meets the Standards of Practice for Land Surveying Chapter 5J-17 requirements of Florida Administration Code.

OSCEOLA COUNTY
Chapter 5J-17, Florida Administrative	Code requires that a legal description drawing bear the notation that
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY.
REVISED: 6/24/2022
SHEET 1  OF 2
SEE SHEET 2 FOR SKETCH
SOUTHEASTERN SURVEYING AND MAPPIN	RPORATION
6500 Al	7'--
0rl

JR.,
Registered Land Surveyor Number 728B
SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION
PS-8288

1" = 40' GRAPHIC SCALE
0	40
EXHIBIT "A" - PAGE 10 of 12

REMINGTON - PHASE 2 PLAT BOOK 11, PAGES 28 &: 29

PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 20-25-30-4829-0001-00L2
EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF OSCEOLA INC OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1674, PAGE 1541

REMINGTON BOULEVARD
RIGHT OF WAY VARIES
PER PLAT BOOK 11, PAGES 28 & 29

TRACT "E"
	 	 -

PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 20-25-30-4829-0001-00EO
REMINGTON COD OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1674, PAGE 1541

----;:ioRTH RIGHT OF WAYLINE (BASIS OF BEARINGS)
POINT OF BEGINNING SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT "E" PLAT BOOK 11, PAGES 28 & 29

--	--
LINE TABLE
L3

-(£  --	--	--
PARTIN SEITLEMENT ROAD
RIGHT OF WAY VARIES
PER FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT
OF WAY MAP FOR STATE ROAD 91 (TURNPIKE MAINLINE), F.P. NO. 4J6194-1

Drawing No. 64576045- PS 828B Job No. 64576
Date: JANUARY 24, 2022
SHEET 2 OF 2
See Sheet 1 for Description

THIS IS NOT A SURVEY.
NOT VALID WITHOUT SHEET 1 THROUGH 2

SOUTHEASTERN SURVEYING AND MAPPING CORPORATION
6500 All American Boulevard Orlando, Florida 32810-4350
(407) 292-8580
Certification Number LB2108
e-mail:  info@southeasternsurveying.com
EXHIBIT “A” – PAGE 11 of 12 PS PARCEL 728A
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
PS Parcel 728A is being acquired as a temporary, non-exclusive easement with full authority to enter upon the lands described in attached Exhibit “A" for a temporary construction easement for side slope extending beyond sidewalk and for removal of existing sidewalk outside of Right-of-Way. At all times during construction the GRANTEE will maintain access to the GRANTOR’S remaining lands.
After the construction on the Parcel is completed the GRANTEE shall restore the Parcel to a condition as good as or better than the one existing before being disturbed by the GRANTEE.
This easement shall expire upon the completion of the construction on the project adjacent to the lands described in attached Exhibit “A” or after five (5) years, whichever occurs first.
PS PARCEL 728B TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
PS Parcel 728B is being acquired as a temporary, non-exclusive easement with full authority to enter upon the lands described in attached Exhibit “A” for a temporary construction easement for construction of new curb returns and side street tie-down. At all times during construction the GRANTEE will maintain access to the GRANTOR’S remaining lands.
After the construction on the Parcel is completed the GRANTEE shall restore the Parcel to a condition as good as or better than the one existing before being disturbed by the GRANTEE.
This easement shall expire upon the completion of the construction on the project adjacent to the lands described in attached Exhibit “A” or after five (5) years, whichever occurs first.
PS PARCEL 728C TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
PS Parcel 728C is being acquired as a temporary, non-exclusive easement with full authority to enter upon the lands described in attached Exhibit “A” for a temporary construction easement for side slope extending beyond sidewalk and for removal of existing sidewalk outside of Right-of-Way. At all times during construction the GRANTEE will maintain access to the GRANTOR’S remaining lands.
After the construction on the Parcel is completed the GRANTEE shall restore the Parcel to a condition as good as or better than the one existing before being disturbed by the GRANTEE.
This easement shall expire upon the completion of the construction on the project adjacent to the lands described in attached Exhibit “A” or after five (5) years, whichever occurs first.
EXHIBIT “A” – PAGE 12 of 12 PS PARCEL 828A PERMANENT EASEMENT
PS PARCEL 828A: THE INTEREST BEING ACQUIRED IS A PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR ROADWAY, TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE.
PS PARCEL 828B PERMANENT EASEMENT
PS PARCEL 828B: THE INTEREST BEING ACQUIRED IS A PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR ROADWAY, TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE.

be first to what’s next.

Tawny Olore, PE
Executive Director

Joshua DeVries, AICP

Remington CDD
PROJECT:	Partin Settlement Road
PARCEL NO.(S):	PS 728A/728B/728C PS 828A/828B
O&E NO.:	TBD
TAX ID NO.:	20-25-30-4829-0001-00D0 20-25-30-4829-0001-00C0
20-25-30-4829-0001-00E0
CERTIFIED MAIL:

UPDATED NOTICE TO OWNER
Transportation Planning

Steven Kane, PE
Transportation Engineer

Kathy Lee, PE
Traffic Engineering

Rene LaPorte
Construction

Gary Yeager
Traffic Operations
C/O Government MGMT Services
E. Livingston St. Orlando, FL 32801-1508

Dear Property Owner,

Osceola County is planning the following improvement of the above referenced transportation facility:

Partin Settlement Road Improvements

Our research shows you own property needed for this project. This letter, along with the enclosed brochure entitled The Real Estate Acquisition Process, explains your rights and options and the process we must follow by law in acquiring your property. The following enclosed documents identify the property that is needed:

Parcel Sketch

Suitable access will be provided by the County to all property affected by the Project and will be reflected on the County's plans once they are finalized. If you no longer own this property, please refer to the enclosed questionnaire.

We recognize that a proposed transportation project, particularly one which requires the acquisition of private property, will usually result in many questions and concerns. Please be assured you will have sufficient time to have your questions answered, to consider and understand your rights, options, and responsibilities, and make all necessary arrangements. Throughout this process we will do our best to ensure your questions are answered, that you are treated fairly and receive all of the rights you are guaranteed by law, and that you receive a fair price for your property.

1 Courthouse Square, Suite 3100	Phone 407-742-0565
Kissimmee, FL 34741	Fax 407-742-0560
Under Federal and State law, you are entitled to certain rights and protections when the County must acquire real estate from you. The following is a summary of your rights:

You may accompany the County's appraiser when your property is inspected as partof the process for valuing your property.
You may obtain copies of the County's appraisal, right-of-way maps and construction plans.
The County will make a written offer to you to purchase your property and will negotiate with you, in good faith, to reach a mutually acceptable purchase price.
If an agreement cannot be reached on the purchase price, a condemnation lawsuit will not be filed until at least 30 days after you receive the initial written offer.
You will receive no less than full compensation for the property acquired. Full compensation includes the value of the real estate acquired, together with damages, if any, to your remaining property.
You may be eligible for relocation assistance benefits if you are required to move or move personal possessions from the property we acquire.
You may receive reimbursement for reasonable attorney fees and other reasonable costs you incur for appraisal and other services associated with the County's acquisition.

Your rights and options are more fully explained in the enclosed brochure entitled The Real Estate Acquisition Process. We encourage you to read this brochure carefully and contact us if you have any questions.

You may be contacted by attorneys, appraisers or others requesting a commitment from you to use their services in dealing with the County. As previously mentioned, the Countywill pay for certain types of services. However, by law, there are limitations placed on what the County can pay. We encourage you to contact us and allow us to fully explain our reimbursement of fees and costs in the enclosed brochure.

Over the coming months, you will be contacted by various County representatives who will schedule property inspections, assess your relocation needs and negotiate with you for the purchase of your property. If you have any questions about any aspect of our acquisition process or if you have information that would help us determine a fair value of your property or help us provide service to you, please let us know. Regardless of whetherwe can reach an agreement on the purchase of your property, we will do our best to be sensitive and responsive to your needs.

Please fill out and return the enclosed questionnaire in the postage-paid envelope provided in this package. This information will help us begin working with you to reach a mutually acceptable settlement for your property. If you experience any problems or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact Rossanna Asencio at (407) 427-2174 or rossanna@americanacquisition.com.
.
Sincerely,

Sally Myers
Right-of-Way & Asset Manager

cc:    Scott D. Clark, Esq. (electronically)
Enclosures:
Parcel Sketch & Construction Plans
The Real Estate Acquisition Process Brochure
Property Owner Questionnaire
Business Owner Questionnaire
Business Survey
Representative Authorization
Pre-Addressed Return Envelope
DESCRIPTION
PS-728A

A portion of Tract "o", Remington -	Phase 2, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 11, Pages 28 and 29, of the public records of Osceola County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows:

Beginning at the Southeast corner of Tract "D", Remington -	Phase 2, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 11, Pages 28 and 29, of the public records of Osceola County, Florida, said point being the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence the following two (2) courses and distances along the North right of way line of Partin Settlement Road, per Florida Department of Transportation Right of Way map	for	State Road 91
(Turnpike Mainline), F.P. No. 436194-1: South 89°50'53" West, a distance of 535.58 feet; North 00°30'33" West, a distance of 12.00 feet; thence departing said North right of way line North 89°50'53" East, a distance of 535.65 feet, to a point on the West right of
way line of Remington Boulevard per said Remington	Phase 2; thence South 00°09'05" East, a distance of 12.00 feet along said West right of way line to the POINT OF BEGINNING.

Containing  6,427 square  feet, more  or less.

SURVEYOR'S  REPORT:

Bearings shown hereon are based on the North right of way line of Partin Settlement Road per Florida Department of Transportation Right of Way map for State Road 91 (Turnpike Mainline), F.P. No. 436194-1, being South 89°50'53" West (assumed).

I hereby certify that the "Sketch of Description" of the above described property is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief as recently drawn under my direction and that it meets the Standards of Practice for Land Surveying Chapter 5J-17 requirements of Florida Administration Code.
DESCRIPTION
Date:
JANUARY 24, 2022	DR
Certification Number LB210864576042 -  PS 728A

FOR
REMINGTON CDD

Job  Number:
64576

Scale:
1" = 100'
M
E •	EV•
OSCEOLA COUNTY
Chapter 5J-17, Florida Administrative	Code requires that a legal description drawing bear the notation that
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY.
REVISED: 6/24/2022 SHEET 1 OF 2
SEE SHEET 2 FOR SKETCH
SOUTHEASTERN SURVEYING AND MAPPING CORPORATION
6500 All American Boulevard Orlando, Florida 32810-4350
(407) 292-8580
e-mail: info@southeasternsurveying.com

EDWIN MUNOZ JR., PSM
Registered Land Surveyor Number 7288
SKETCH	OF DESCRIPTION
PS-728A

1" =100' GRAPHIC SCALE
I
0

100

0
_g,:
a::: (0
::> :::>
0>-
mi;:
zw	ZLL.a
:J	o@
>-	c,1-s
u..	z:cci.
0	-C>o::
f---
(.?	LaJ
f---
<wn
3::

NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE (BASIS OF BEARINGS)	L1
POINT OF BEGINNING
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT "D"

PARTIN SETTLEMENT ROAD
RIGHT OF WAY VARIES
PER FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT
OF WAY MAP FOR STATE ROAD 91 (TURNPIKE MAINLINE), F.P. NO. 436194-1
	PLAT BOOK  11,  PAGES  28 & 29 	Ct

LINE TABLE			
LINE #	BEARING	LENGTH	
L1	S89'5O'53"W	535.58'	
L2	NOO'3O'33"W	12.00'	
L3	N89'5O'53"E	535.65'	
L4	SOO'O9'O5"E	12.00'	

Drawing No. 64576042 - PS 728A Job No. 64576
Date: JANUARY 24, 2022

THIS IS NOT A SURVEY.

E •	EV•
SOUTHEASTERN SURVEYING AND MAPPING CORPORATION
6500 All American Boulevard Orlando, Florida 32810-4350
( 407) 292-8580
Certification Number 182108
SHEET 2 OF 2
See Sheet 1 for  Description
NOT VALID WITHOUT SHEET 1	THROUGH  2 e-mail:  info@southeasternsurveying.com
DESCRIPTION
PS-728B

A portion of Tract "c", Remington -	Phase 2, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 11, Pages 28 and 29, of the public records of Osceola County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows:

Commencing at the Southeast corner of Tract "D", Remington -	Phase 2, according to the plat thereof,  as recorded in Plat Book  11, Pages 28 and  29,  of  the  public records of Osceola County, Florida; thence North 00°09'05" West, a distance of 15.00 feet along the West right of way line of Remington Boulevard per said Remington  -	Phase 2 to the
POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing along said West right of way line, North 00°09'05" West,  a  distance  of  25.00  feet; thence  departing  said  West  right  of  way  line North 89°50'53" East,  a  distance  of  130.00  feet  to  a  point  on  the East  right  of  way  line  of said Remington  Boulevard;  thence  South  00°09'05" East,  a  distance  of  25.34  feet  along
said East  right  of  way  line; thence  departing  said East  right  of  way line North  90°00'00" West, a distance of 130.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.

Containing  3,272  square  feet,  more  or less.

SURVEYOR'S  REPORT:

Bearings shown hereon are based on the North right of way line of Partin Settlement Road per Florida Department of Transportation Right of Way map for State Road 91 (Turnpike Mainline), F.P. No. 436194-1, being South 89°50'53" West (assumed).

I hereby certify that the "Sketch of Description" of the above described property is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief as recently drawn under my direction and that it meets the Standards of Practice for Land Surveying Chapter 5J-17 requirements of Florida Administration Code.
DESCRIPTION
Date:
JANUARY 24, 2022	DR
Certification Number LB210864576044 -  PS 728B

FOR
REMINGTON CDD

Job  Number:
64576

Scale:
1" = 40'
M
E •	EV•
OSCEOLA COUNTY
Chapter 5J-17, Florida Administrative	Code requires that a legal description drawing bear the notation that
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY.
REVISED: 6/24/2022 SHEET 1 OF 2
SEE SHEET 2 FOR SKETCH
SOUTHEASTERN SURVEYING AND MAPPING CORPORATION
6500 All American Boulevard Orlando, Florida 32810-4350
(407) 292-8580
e-mail: info@southeasternsurveying.com

EDWIN MUNOZ JR., PSM
Registered Land Surveyor Number 7288
SKETCH	OF DESCRIPTION
PS-728B

--t-
I{)
0)
a:::o	lJ.J	('I
We.,
CD a
('I ol'J

1" = 40' GRAPHIC SCALE
I
0	40
o	1£.1 CX)
z	a z0am
o_o u	ll.
1- lz
<30>00
-N1-o	2:-
CO c., CD
1---t- z

zw
:J	E.?
Zl-(1) (:)
01"')1.J.Ja:::
-	I a:::
.JI{)  0
>-	>-
>-
(.)
lJ.J N
<JI	a:::
a:::o
LL
0
>­
Ic:,
Ck'
REMINGTON BOULEVARD
RIGHT OF WAY VARIES
'&
0	>-
>-
I
c:,
N	.J	ll.
(.)
uLi.:.:

f-­
(11
PER PLAT BOOK 11, PAGES 28 & 29	Ck'	0
(11

REMINGTON - PHASE 2 PLAT BOOK 11, PAGES 28 & 29
:w,:
TRACT "C''
N89°50'53"E	130.00'
c'i
PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER
20-25-30-4829-0001-00DO REMINGTON CDD OFFICIAL RECORDS
I"")
_J
TRACT "E"
BOOK 1674, PAGE 1541
TRACT "D"
,,_
N90°00'00"W	130.00'
POINT OF BEGINNING,	_J
NORTH RIGHTOF WAYUNE (BASIS OF BEARINGS)

POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT "D"
PLAT BOOK 11, PAGES 28 & 29

PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 20-25-30-4829-0001-00EO
REMINGTON CDD OFFICIAL RECORDS
BOOK 1674, PAGE 1541
I

-t­
PARTIN SETTLEMENT ROAD
RIGHT OF WAY VARIES
PER F'LORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT
OF WAY MAP FOR STATE ROAD 91 (TURNPIKE MAINLINE), F.P. NO. 436194-1

Drawing No. 64576044 - PS 728B
Job No. 64576
Date: JANUARY 24, 2022

THIS IS NOT A SURVEY.
E •	EV•
SOUTHEASTERN SURVEYING AND MAPPING CORPORATION
6500 All American Boulevard Orlando, Florida 32810-4350
(407) 292-8580
Certification Number 182108
SHEET 2 OF 2
See Sheet 1 for Description
NOT VALID WITHOUT SHEET 1	THROUGH 2 e-mail: info@southeasternsurveying.com
DESCRIPTION
PS-728C

A portion of Tract "E", Remington -	Phase 2, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 11, Pages 28 and 29, of the public records of Osceola County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows:

Commencing at the Southwest corner of Tract "E", Remington -  Phase 2, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book  11, Pages 28 and 29,  of the public records of Osceola County, Florida; thence North 00°09'05" West, a distance of 10.00 feet along
the East right of way line of Remington Boulevard per said Remington -	Phase 2; thence departing said East right of way line North 89°50'53" East, a distance of 6.35 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence the following tow (2) courses and distances: North 89°50'53" East, a distance of  127.03 feet; South 88°02'46" East, a distance of 272.16  feet to a point on the North right of way line of Partin Settlement Road, per Florida Department of Transportation Right of Way map	for State Road 91 (Turnpike Mainline), F.P. No.
436194-1; thence South 89°50'53" West, a distance of 385.35 feet along said North right of way  line; thence  departing  said North right  of way  line North 53°55'08" West,  a distance of 16.92 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.

Containing  2,562  square  feet,  more  or less.

SURVEYOR'S  REPORT:

Bearings shown hereon are based on the North right of way line of Partin Settlement Road per Florida Department of Transportation Right of Way map for State Road 91 (Turnpike Mainline), F.P. No. 436194-1, being South 89°50'53" West (assumed).

I hereby certify that the "Sketch of Description" of the above described property is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief as recently drawn under my direction and that it meets the Standards of Practice for Land Surveying Chapter 5J-17 requirements of Florida Administration Code.
DESCRIPTION
Date:
JANUARY 24, 2022	DR
Certification Number LB210864576046 -  PS 728C

FOR
REMINGTON CDD

Job  Number:
64576

Scale:
1" = 60'
M
E •	EV•
OSCEOLA COUNTY
Chapter 5J-17, Florida Administrative	Code requires that a legal description drawing bear the notation that
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY.
REVISED: 6/24/2022
SHEET 1 OF 2
SEE SHEET 2 FOR SKETCH
SOUTHEASTERN SURVEYING AND MAPPING CORPORATION
6500 All American Boulevard Orlando, Florida 32810-4350
(407) 292-8580
e-mail: info@southeasternsurveying.com

EDWIN MUNOZ JR., PSM
Registered Land Surveyor Number 7288
SKETCH	OF DESCRIPTION
PS-728C

1" = 60' GRAPHIC SCALE
I
0	60

PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 20-25-30-4829-0001-00L2
EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF OSCEOLA INC
OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1674, PAGE 1541

REMINGTON - PHASE 2 PLAT BOOK 11, PAGES 28 & 29

-t-
sa9·50'53"w	385.35'
POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT "E" PLAT BOOK 11, PAGES 28 & 29
NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE (BASIS OF BEARINGS)

PARTIN SETTLEMENT ROAD
RIGHT OF WAY VARIES
PER FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT
OF WAY MAP FOR STATE ROAD 91 (TURNPIKE MAINLINE), F.P. NO. 436194-1

LINE TABLE			
LINE #	BEARING	LENGTH	
L1	N00"09'05"W	10.00'	
L2	N89"50'53"E	6.35'	
L3	N53"55'08''W	16.92'	

Drawing No. 64576046 - PS 728C Job No. 64576
Date: JANUARY 24, 2022

THIS IS NOT A SURVEY.
E •	EV•
SOUTHEASTERN SURVEYING AND MAPPING CORPORATION
6500 All American Boulevard Orlando, Florida 32810-4350
( 407) 292-8580
Certification Number 182108
SHEET 2 OF 2
See Sheet 1 for  Description
NOT VALID WITHOUT SHEET 1	THROUGH  2 e-mail:  info@southeasternsurveying.com
DESCRIPTION
PS-828A

A portion of Tract "c", Remington -	Phase 2, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 11, Pages 28 and 29, of the public records of Osceola County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows:

Beginning at the Southeast corner of Tract "D", Remington -	Phase 2, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 11, Pages 28 and 29, of the public records of Osceola County, Florida, said point being the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 00°09'05" West, a distance of 15.00 feet along the West right of way line of Remington Boulevard per said Remington -	Phase 2 ; thence departing said West right of way line North
90°00'00" East, a distance of 130.00 feet to a point on the East right of way line of said Remington Boulevard; thence South 00°09'05" East, a distance of 14.66 feet along said East right of way line, to a point on the North right of way line of Partin Settlement Road, per Florida Department of Transportation Right of Way map	for	State
Road 91 (Turnpike Mainline), F.P. No. 436194-1; thence South 89°50'53" West, a distance of 130.00 feet along said North right of way line to the POINT OF BEGINNING.

Containing  1,928 square  feet,  more  or less.

SURVEYOR'S  REPORT:

Bearings shown hereon are based on the North right of way line of Partin Settlement Road per Florida Department of Transportation Right of Way map for State Road 91 (Turnpike Mainline), F.P. No. 436194-1, being South 89°50'53" West (assumed).

I hereby certify that the "Sketch of Description" of the above described property is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief as recently drawn under my direction and that it meets the Standards of Practice for Land Surveying Chapter 5J-17 requirements of Florida Administration Code.
DESCRIPTION
Date:
JANUARY 24, 2022	DR
Certification Number LB210864576043 -  PS 828A

FOR
REMINGTON CDD

Job Number:
64576

Scale:
1"  = 40'
M
E •	EV•
OSCEOLA COUNTY
Chapter 5J-17, Florida Administrative	Code requires that a legal description drawing bear the notation that
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY.
REVISED: 6/24/2022 SHEET 1 OF 2
SEE SHEET 2 FOR SKETCH
SOUTHEASTERN SURVEYING AND MAPPING CORPORATION
6500 All American Boulevard Orlando, Florida 32810-4350
(407) 292-8580
e-mail: info@southeasternsurveying.com

EDWIN MUNOZ JR., PSM
Registered Land Surveyor Number 7288
SKETCH	OF DESCRIPTION
PS-828A

--t-
I{)
0)
,...
a:::o	lJ.J	('I
We.,

1" = 40' GRAPHIC SCALE
I
o	1£.1 CX)
z	a z0am
o_o u	ll.
1- lz
<30>00
0	40
-N1-o	2:-
CO c., CD
1---t- z

LOT 14

SOMERSET

f--
0

lwz
::::;

E.?
f--
0
Zl-(1) (:)
01"')1.J.Ja:::
-	I a:::
.JI{)  0
lJ.J N
<JI	a:::
a:::o
.J
PLAT BOOK 16, PAGES 178 & 179
f--
>--
J	f--
N	<(
ll.

REMINGTON -
PLAT BOOK 11, PAG
PARCEL IDENTIFIC
20-25-30-4829-
REMINGTON COD OFFICI
BOOK 1674, PAG
TRACT "D"

NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE

POINT OF B
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT "D" PLAT BOOK 11, PAGES 28 & 29

20-25-30-4829-0001-00EO
REMINGTON COD OFFICIAL RECORDS
BOOK 1674, PAGE 1541

PARTIN SETTLEMENT ROAD
RIGHT OF WAY VARIES
PER F'LORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT
OF WAY MAP FOR STATE ROAD 91 (TURNPIKE MAINLINE), F.P. NO. 436194-1

Drawing No. 64576043 - PS 828A Job No. 64576
Date: JANUARY 24, 2022

THIS IS NOT A SURVEY.
E •	EV•
SOUTHEASTERN SURVEYING AND MAPPING CORPORATION
6500 All American Boulevard Orlando, Florida 32810-4350
( 407) 292-8580
Certification Number 182108
SHEET 2 OF 2
See Sheet 1 for Description
NOT VALID WITHOUT SHEET 1	THROUGH  2 e-mail:  info@southeasternsurveying.com
DESCRIPTION
PS-828B

A portion of Tract "E", Remington -	Phase 2, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 11, Pages 28 and 29, of the public records of Osceola County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows:

Beginning at the Southwest corner of Tract "E", Remington -	Phase 2, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 11, Pages 28 and 29, of the public records of Osceola County, Florida, said point being the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 00°09'05" West, a distance of 14.66 feet along the East right of way line of Remington Boulevard per said Remington -	Phase 2; thence departing said East right of way line South 53°55'08" East, a distance of 24. 79 feet to a point on the North right of way line of Partin Settlement Road, per Florida Department of Transportation Right of Way map	for
State Road 91 (Turnpike Mainline), F.P. No. 436194-1; thence South 89°50'53" West, a distance of 20.00 feet along said North right of way line to the POINT OF BEGINNING.

Containing  147  square  feet, more or less.

SURVEYOR'S  REPORT:

Bearings shown hereon are based on the North right of way line of Partin Settlement Road per Florida Department of Transportation Right of Way map for State Road 91 (Turnpike Mainline), F.P. No. 436194-1, being South 89°50'53" West (assumed).

I hereby certify that the "Sketch of Description" of the above described property is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief as recently drawn under my direction and that it meets the Standards of Practice for Land Surveying Chapter 5J-17 requirements of Florida Administration Code.
DESCRIPTION
Date:
JANUARY 24, 2022	DR
Certification Number LB2108 64576045- PS 828B

FOR
REMINGTON CDD

Job Number:
64576

Scale:
1"  = 40'
M
E •	EV•
OSCEOLA COUNTY
Chapter 5J-17, Florida Administrative	Code requires that a legal description drawing bear the notation that
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY.
REVISED: 6/24/2022 SHEET 1 OF 2
SEE SHEET 2 FOR SKETCH
SOUTHEASTERN SURVEYING AND MAPPING CORPORATION
6500 All American Boulevard Orlando, Florida 32810-4350
(407) 292-8580
e-mail: info@southeasternsurveying.com

EDWIN MUNOZ JR., PSM
Registered Land Surveyor Number 7288
SKETCH	OF DESCRIPTION
PS-828B

1" = 40' GRAPHIC SCALE
I
0	40

I
::;

REMINGTON - PHASE 2 PLAT BOOK 11, PAGES 28 & 29

PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 20-25-30-4829-0001-00L2
EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF OSCEOLA INC
BOOK 1674, PAGE 1541

REMINGTON
RIGHT OF
PER PLAT BOOK 1
ARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER
-25-30-4829-0001-00EO  COD OFFICIAL RECORDS
BOOK 167 4, PAGE 1541

NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE

POINT OF
SOUTHWEST CORNER Or TRACT "E" PLAT BOOK 11, PAGES 28 & 29

-t-

PARTIN SETTLEMENT ROAD
RIGHT OF WAY VARIES
PER FLORIDA DEPARTMENT Or TRANSPORTATION RIGHT
Or WAY MAP FOR STATE ROAD 91 (TURNPIKE MAINLINE), r.P. NO. 436194-1

Drawing No. 64576045- PS 828B
Job No. 64576
Date: JANUARY 24, 2022

THIS IS NOT A SURVEY.
E •	EV•
SOUTHEASTERN SURVEYING AND MAPPING CORPORATION
6500 All American Boulevard Orlando, Florida 32810-4350
(407) 292-8580
Certification Number 182108
SHEET 2 OF 2
See Sheet 1 for Description
NOT VALID WITHOUT SHEET 1	THROUGH 2 e-mail: info@southeasternsurveying.com

(_J "( LJ...
'St
a a
"1

Lr)

(.')

\0
Lu
:::,
0::
0::
Lau
:<::,
a
Lu
-..J
"(
Lu
V)
a
"(
a
Lu
(.')

V)
>-
-..J
-..J
"(
I-
(.')
a
Lu
-..J
LJ...
(_J
<a
0::
I-
(_J
Lu
-..J
Lu
:L:ru:
I-
V)

I-
Lu Lu
::r:
V)

V)
::r:
I-
aLJ...
a a0::
(_J Lu 0::

-..J
"(
(_J
LJ...
aLJ...
Lu
::r:
I-

(/ /1/
i I
ci
:::.
...J
CQ
<
I1-

(_J "( LJ...

s::
h-,
(")
:i:
r­
R!EfVIA'IN	II
	 r =---4--
ro REI AIN

. EASEMENT

BT(B)	BT(B)-
12.01

-4-1.00' U6T(B

s::
h-,
(")
:i:
r-

'St
a a
"1

Lr)

(_')

\0
Lu
:::,
0::
0::
Lau
:<::,
a
Lu
...J
"(
Lu
V)
a
"(
<rr,
-V),
h
LT.

108

STA. +63.
4.00' RT.
<rr,
-V),
h
.....
I\J
V1
a
a a
a
Lu
(_')

V)
>-
...J
...J "( I-
(_')
a
Lu
...J
LJ...
(_J
<a
0::
I-
(_J
Lu
...J
Lu
:L:ru:
I-
V)

DATE

DESCRIPTION

REVISIONS
DATE

DESCRIPTION

ENGINEER JASON FLICK, P.E.

OF RECORD

OSCEOLA COUNTY TRANSPORTATffON & TRANSffT

SHEET NO.

I-
Lu Lu
::r:
V)

V)
::r:
I-
LJ...
a
a a0::
(_J Lu 0::

...J
"(
(_J
LJ...
LJ...
a
Lu
::r:
I-
LICENSE  NU/VIBER  74741 JOHNSON, /VIIR/VIIRAN & TH0/VIPS0N
400 COLONIAL CENTER PKY, SUITE JOO LAKE /VIARY, FL 32746
ROAD IDENTIFICATION

PARTIN SETTLEMENT  RD.
CONTRACT ID

PS-20-11504-DG
ROADWAY PLANS
47

u
"(
LJ...

'St
a a
"1

Lr)

(.')

\0
Lu
:::,
0::
0::
Lau
:<::,
a
Lu
-..J
"(
Lu
V)
a
"(
a
<Lu
V)
>-
-..J
-..J "( I-
(.')
a
Lu
-..J
LJ...
u
<a
0::
uI-
Lu
-..J
Lu
:L:ru:
I-
V)

I-
Lu
::r:
V)
::r:
aLJ...
0::

Lu

"(
u
LJ...
aLJ...
Lu
::r:
I-

ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY

Introduction
TRANSPORTATION & TRANSIT
RIGHT OF WAY
1/22

Osceola County has prepared this informational document to describe the procedures the County must follow by law in purchasing your property. If anything in this letter, or the attachments, is unclear, please contact Sally Myers, Right-of-Way and Asset Manager for Osceola County at 407-742-0502 or sally.myers@osceola.org.

You will receive a written offer from Osceola County along with an explanation of the rights guaranteed to you by law. The letter will explain the nature of the project for which your property is needed, describe the portion of your property needed for the project and provide you the project and parcel designation we will use to identify the portion of your property being acquired. If you request copies of our appraisal of your property, right of way maps or construction plans, we will provide them within 15 business day of our receipt of your request. If our right of way maps and construction plans are not complete at the time of your request, we will provide them to the extent they are prepared.

Appraisal of Real Property

You will be contacted by an independent appraiser or real estate specialist working for Osceola County who will appraise or otherwise estimate the value of your property. The appraiser or real estate specialist must inspect your property as part of the valuation process. You are encouraged to be present during the inspection and provide any information you believe affects the value of your property.

You may obtain your own appraisal of the portion of your property being acquired. In order for the County to pay an appraisal fee, you must provide us a copy of your appraisal and submit an invoice showing the services performed by date, the hourly rate and the amount of the fee.

Negotiation for Purchase of Real Property

You will receive a written offer to purchase your property. The offer will be no less than the appraised value. If only a portion of your property is being acquired, the offer will also include an amount necessary to compensate you for any loss in value to your remaining property resulting from the partial acquisition. We will negotiate with you to try and reach a mutually acceptable agreement for the purchase of your property.
TRANSPORTATION & TRANSIT
RIGHT OF WAY
1/22
You may wish to be represented by an attorney or other agent during negotiations. If you choose to be represented, we will ask you to provide us written authorization, signed by both you and your representative. Once we have received your written authorization, we will conduct negotiations with your representative. However, the initial written offer must be delivered directly to you.  Your authorized representative may be present when we deliver the initial offer, if you wish.

If you choose to be represented by an attorney, the County will pay a reasonable fee for his/her services provided the attorney is licensed to practice in Florida. If we reach an agreement with you for the purchase of your property, we will pay your attorney to review and analyze the details of the acquisition and to assist you in negotiations. The amount for attorney fees will either be based on a schedule contained in Florida Statutes, or if we both agree, based on a reasonable number of hours and hourly rate. If we cannot agree to a purchase price, attorney fees will be paid as described later under Eminent Domain. If we reach an agreement as to the amount of compensation, you will be asked to sign a purchase agreement agreeing to the terms of the sale.

You do not have to accept our offer of compensation for your property. You may make a counteroffer in the amount you feel is appropriate and we will consider your counteroffer in the negotiations. If we cannot reach an agreement as to the amount of compensation for your property the County may, as a last resort, seek to acquire your property through the courts. This is known as condemnation and is explained more thoroughly in the section entitled Eminent Domain. By law you must be given at least 30 days from the date you receive our written offer to respond before we can begin the condemnation process.
Real Estate Closing

At the closing we will provide the check for the agreed amount of compensation for your property and any damages to your remaining property, if applicable.  In exchange, you will be asked to sign the appropriate documents to convey your property to Osceola County. The payment of fees and costs will also take place at closing. Fees and costs will not affect the agreed upon price for the real estate.

If we reach agreement on the value of your property, but cannot agree on the amount of the fees and costs, we can go forward with the closing for real estate and defer payment of the fees and costs. Ultimately, if we cannot agree on an amount for fees and costs, you have the right to file an action in the Circuit Court and have the court decide the amount to be paid.

Eminent Domain

	Osceola County always prefers to acquire property through negotiated settlements. However, if after negotiations we cannot agree on the price to be paid for your property, the County must consider acquisition through the courts which is called condemnation. The right to acquire private property through condemnation is known as the power of eminent domain.

	Although the County has the right to acquire private property, it must insure the owner is fully compensated for the property. In a condemnation suit, a jury may ultimately decide the amount the County must pay. However, if the County files a condemnation suit, we will continue to negotiate with you and your attorney to try to arrive at a mutually satisfactory amount to compensate you for your property.  If we agree on the terms of settlement, the condemnation suit will be concluded, and your fees and costs will be paid as previously described.
TRANSPORTATION & TRANSIT
RIGHT OF WAY
1/22
	In a condemnation action, your attorney fees will be paid based on a schedule contained in Florida Statutes. Fees will be paid calculated as a percentage of the benefit your attorney achieves for you. The term benefit means the difference between the amounts the court awards (final judgment amount) and the amount of the last written offer made before you hire an attorney. If no written offer has been made before you hire an attorney, the benefit will be calculated from the first written offer made by the County after you hire an attorney. In determining the amount of benefit for the purposes of calculating attorney fees, the court may also consider nonmonetary benefits the attorney obtains for you.

	After 120 days have passed, from the time you file your answer to our lawsuit, you may make an offer to the County to settle all claims, except fees and costs. This offer is known as a defendant’s offer of judgment. If we reject your offer of judgment and the amount the court awards (final judgment amount) exclusive of interest, is equal to or more than your offer of judgment, your attorney fees will be paid based on an amount the court determines you would ordinarily be expected to pay if the County were not responsible for payment. Please be aware that the law limits your offer of judgment to a maximum of $100,000.

	The reasonable costs you incur for services other than legal services, as a result of the condemnation, will also be paid by the County. However, payment of these costs may be limited, if after 120 days from the date you file your answer to our lawsuit the County makes an offer to settle all claims, excluding fees and costs (petitioner’s offer of judgment). If you reject our offer of judgment and the amount the jury awards (final judgment amount), exclusive of interest, is equal to or less than our offer of judgment, you will be responsible for all costs you incur after the date you reject our offer of judgment.

The law does not allow the County to pay interest on amounts for fees and costs.

Conclusion

We understand that a transportation project requiring the acquisition of private property may cause concern and result in many questions. We are very interested in hearing your concerns and answering your questions. You will have adequate time to obtain all of the information you need, to study your options and make informed decisions. Please be assured we will do everything we can do to be sensitive and responsive to your needs and to insure you receive all of your rights.

The rights explained in this informational letter are derived from Chapter 73, Florida Statutes. The relevant portions of Chapter 73 are provided for your information (see Appendix).

PROPERTY ACQUISITION
At-A-Glance
TRANSPORTATION & TRANSIT
RIGHT OF WAY
1/22

BUSINESS DAMAGES
TRANSPORTATION & TRANSIT
RIGHT OF WAY
1/22

Introduction to Business Damages

As the owner of business located on property acquired for a transportation project, you may be eligible to receive compensation for damages directly caused by the acquisition. This informational letter explains your rights and responsibilities and how an eligible business may file a claim for business damages. It also explains the procedures we must follow in compensating you for eligible business damage claims. If you have questions after reading this letter, please ask us. We want to work with you to ensure you are compensated for any legally compensable damages your business experiences.

You will receive a letter notifying you of your legal rights either at the time we make a written purchase offer to the owner of the real estate on which your business is located or shortly thereafter. The letter will explain the nature of the project, describe the portion of the property needed, and provide you the project and parcel designation we will use to identify the portion of the property that will be acquired. The letter will also provide contact information for Osceola County where you can obtain additional information about the property and the project. If you request copies of right of way maps, construction plans and our appraisal on which our offer to the landowner is based, we will provide them to you within 15 business days after we receive your request. If our right of way maps and construction plans are not complete at the time of your request, we will provide them to the extent they are prepared.

We may reimburse you for certain fees and costs you incur as a result of an eligible business damage claim, such as attorney and/or accountant or business damage expert fees. Please understand the County cannot pay fees and costs if your business is not eligible for damages as described later in this letter.

Eligibility for Business Damages

To be eligible for a business damage payment, your business must meet the following conditions:
The business must hold a property interest in the portion of the property being acquired.
The acquisition must be a partial acquisition of the property on which your business is located. Your business will not qualify for damages if all of the real estate on which your business is located is acquired.
Your business must have been in operation on the site for at least 5 years immediately prior to Osceola County’s acquisition.
You must be able to show that any damages you are claiming result directly from the loss of property. The effects of construction activities or other effects incidental to construction are not compensable.

Filing a Business Damage Claim

You may claim business damages if your business is damaged and it is eligible as described in the section entitled Eligibility for Business Damages. If you claim damages, you must submit a good faith written offer to settle your business claim to Osceola County no later than 180 days after you receive the letter described in the Introduction to Business Damages.

You must send your offer by certified mail to Osceola County, Public Works Department, c/o Sally Myers, 1 Courthouse Square, Suite 3100, Kissimmee, FL 34741. If you do not submit your offer to settle your
TRANSPORTATION & TRANSIT
RIGHT OF WAY
1/22
business claim within the specified time, your claim may not be allowed in future condemnation proceedings. If you share ownership of the business with others, you should coordinate with the other owners and provide only one business damage claim for the business.

Your offer to settle your business damage claim must include an explanation of the nature, extent and monetary amount of the damages you are claiming. The offer must be prepared by:

You as the business owner,
A certified public accountant or
A business damage expert familiar with the operations of your business.

With your offer, you must also provide copies of your business records for the five years immediately preceding the date of the County’s letter as described in the Introduction to Business Damages.

Records must be attributable to the business operation on the property being acquired and any other record(s) you relied upon in supporting your business damage claim. Business records, as defined by law, include but are not limited to federal income tax returns, federal income tax withholding statements, federal miscellaneous income tax statements, state sales tax returns, balance sheets, profit and loss statements and state corporate income tax returns. If you request in writing that your records be maintained as confidential, we will do so.

Please be aware that if you fail to provide records needed to substantiate your claim, the amount of attorney fees you are eligible to receive could be affected.

Osceola County’s Response to Your Business Claim

Within 120 days after we receive your offer, we will send you a written response by certified mail. We will either, accept your offer, reject your offer or make a counteroffer for settlement of your claim.

If you do not provide records as described in Filing a Business Damage Claim and those records are found in subsequent legal proceedings to be necessary to determine the amount of your business damages, we will provide you a written counteroffer within 90 days following our receipt of the additional records.

Settlement of a Business Damage Claim

If we reach agreement on the amount of your business damages, we will schedule a business damage closing as described later in this letter under Business Damage Closing.

In addition to the payment for business damages, the County will pay reasonable costs you incur in preparing and presenting your business damage claim. These costs include, but are not limited to, the cost for hiring a certified public accountant or business damage expert. You must provide us copies of all work produced by your experts for whom you are seeking payment. You must also provide invoices detailing the services performed by date, hourly rate and the total fee. The County will pay based on the usual and customary rates for such services charged.

If you choose to be represented by an attorney, the County will pay a reasonable fee for your attorney to assist you in preparing and presenting your claim. If we accept your initial offer to settle your eligible
TRANSPORTATION & TRANSIT
RIGHT OF WAY
1/22
business damage claim or if settlement is based on your acceptance of our initial counteroffer, the amountof fees will be based on a reasonable number of hours and hourly rate.

If settlement of business damages is not based on our acceptance of your initial offer or your acceptance of our initial counteroffer, payment of attorney fees will be based on a statutory formula.

Business Damage Closing

We will provide a check for the agreed amount of your damages at the business damage closing. In return, you will be asked to sign the necessary documents indicating that your claim for business damages has been settled. The payment of fees and costs will also take place at the closing. Fees and costs will not affect the agreed upon settlement.

If we reach agreement on the amount of your business damages, but cannot agree on the amount of the fees and costs to be paid, we can go forward with the business damage closing and defer payment of the fees and costs. You have the right to file an action in the Circuit Court and have the court decide the amount to be paid if we cannot agree on an amount for fees and costs.

Business Damages in Eminent Domain

If your claim for business damages is resolved in a condemnation proceeding, the reasonable costs you incur, other than attorney fees, will be paid as determined by the court.

If we accept your initial good faith offer or you accept our initial counteroffer, the amount of attorney fees will be based on the amount you would be expected to pay if the County were not responsible for the fees. Otherwise, we will pay attorney fees based on a statutory formula applied to the amount of benefit your attorney achieves for you. For the purpose of calculating attorney fees for amounts awarded for business damages. For the purposes of calculating benefit, the County’s counteroffer will be, the initial amount we offer you in response to your claim. If we reject your initial claim and it is later determined you are entitled to business damages, the County’s counteroffer will be considered to be zero. If you do not provide all of the records needed to substantiate your claim, the amount of the County’s counteroffer will be the amount of our first written offer after we receive the additional records.

Conclusion

Be assured we want to compensate you for eligible damages your business experiences as a result of our acquisition. You can help us do this by providing all of the records needed to substantiate your claim for damages and working with us to arrive at a mutually satisfactory settlement.

The rights explained in this informational letter are derived from Chapter 73, Florida Statutes. The relevant portions of Chapter 73 are provided for your information. (See Appendix).

73.015	Presuit negotiation. —

APPENDIX
TRANSPORTATION & TRANSIT
RIGHT OF WAY
1/22

Before an eminent domain proceeding is brought under this chapter or chapter 74, the condemning authority must attempt to negotiate in good faith with the fee owner of the parcel to be acquired, must provide the fee owner with a written offer and, if requested, a copy of the appraisal upon which the offer is based, and must attempt to reach an agreement regarding the amount of compensation to be paid for the parcel.

No later than the time the initial written or oral offer of compensation for acquisition is made to the fee owner, the condemning authority must notify the fee owner of the following:

That all or a portion of his or her property is necessary for a project.

The nature of the project for which the parcel is considered necessary, and the parcel designation of the property to be acquired.

That, within 15 business days after receipt of a request by the fee owner, the condemning authority will provide a copy of the appraisal report upon which the offer to the fee owner is based; copies, to the extent prepared, of the right-of-way maps or other documents that depict the proposed taking; and copies, to the extent prepared, of the construction plans that depict project improvements to be constructed on the property taken and improvements to be constructed adjacent to the remaining property, including, but not limited to, plan, profile, cross-section, drainage, and pavement marking sheets, and driveway connection detail. The condemning authority shall provide any additional plan sheets within 15 days of request.

The fee owner’s statutory rights under ss. 73.091 and 73.092, or alternatively provide copies of these provisions of law.

The fee owner’s rights and responsibilities under paragraphs (b) and (c) and subsection (4), or alternatively provide copies of these provisions of law.

The condemning authority must provide a written offer of compensation to the fee owner as to the value of the property sought to be appropriated and, where less than the entire property is sought to be appropriated, any damages to the remainder caused by the taking. The owner must be given at least 30 days after either receipt of the notice or the date the notice is returned as undeliverable by the postal authorities to respond to the offer, before the condemning authority files a condemnation proceeding for the parcel identified in the offer.

The notice and written offer must be sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the fee owner’s last known address listed on the county ad valorem tax roll. Alternatively, the notice and written offer may be personally delivered to the fee owner of the property. If there is more than one owner of a property, notice to one owner constitutes notice to all owners of the property. The return of the notice as undeliverable by the postal authorities constitutes compliance with this provision. The condemning authority is not required to give notice or a written offer to a person who acquires title to the property after the notice required by this section has been given.
TRANSPORTATION & TRANSIT
RIGHT OF WAY
1/22
Notwithstanding this subsection, with respect to lands acquired under s. 253.025, the condemning authority is not required to give the fee owner the current appraisal before executing an option contract.

Before an eminent domain proceeding is brought under this chapter or chapter 74 by the Department of Transportation or by a county, municipality, board, district, or other public body for the condemnation of right-of-way, the condemning authority must make a good faith effort to notify the business owners, including lessees, who operate a business located on the property to be acquired.

The condemning authority must notify the business located on the property to be acquired.

That all or a portion of his or her property is necessary for a project.

The nature of the project for which the parcel is considered necessary, and the parcel designation of the property to be acquired.

That, within 15 business days after receipt of a request by the business owner, the condemning authority will provide a copy of the appraisal report upon which the offer to the fee owner is based; copies, to the extent prepared, of the right-of-way maps or other documents that depict the proposed taking; and copies, to the extent prepared, of the construction plans that depict project improvements to be constructed on the property taken and improvements to be constructed adjacent to the remaining property, including, but not limited to, plan, profile, cross-section, drainage, pavement marking sheets, and driveway connection detail. The condemning authority shall provide any additional plan sheets within 15 days of request.

The business owner’s statutory rights under ss. 73.071, 73.091, and 73.092.

The business owner’s rights and responsibilities under paragraphs (b) and (c) and subsection (4).

The notice must be made subsequent to or concurrent with the condemning authority’s making the written offer of compensation to the fee owner pursuant to subsection (1). The notice must be sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the address of the registered agent for the business located on the property to be acquired, or if no agent is registered, by certified mail or personal delivery to the address of the business located on the property to be acquired. Notice to one owner of a multiple ownership business constitutes notice to all business owners of that business. The return of the notice as undeliverable by the postal authorities constitutes compliance with these provisions. The condemning authority is not required to give notice to a person who acquires an interest in the business after the notice required by this section has been given. Once notice has been made to business owners under this subsection, the condemning authority may file a condemnation proceeding pursuant to chapter 73 or chapter 74 for the property identified in the notice.

If the business qualifies for business damages pursuant to s. 73.071(3)(b) and the business intends to claim business damages, the business owner must, within 180 days after either receipt of the notice or the date the notice is returned as undeliverable by the postal authorities, or at a later time mutually agreed to by the condemning authority and the business owner, submit to the condemning authority a good faith written offer to settle any claims of business damage. The written offer must be sent to the condemning authority by certified mail, return receipt requested. Absent a showing of a good faith justification for the failure to submit a business damage offer within 180 days, the court must strike the business owner’s claim for business damages in any condemnation proceeding. If the court finds that the business owner has made a showing of a good faith justification for the failure to timely submit a business
TRANSPORTATION & TRANSIT
RIGHT OF WAY
1/22
damage offer, the court shall grant the business owner up to 180 days within which to submit a business damage offer, which the condemning authority must respond to within 120 days.

The business damage offer must include an explanation of the nature, extent, and monetary amount of such damage and must be prepared by the owner, a certified public accountant, or a business damage expert familiar with the nature of the operations of the owner’s business. The business owner shall also provide to the condemning authority copies of the owner’s business records that substantiate the good faith offer to settle the business damage claim. If additional information is needed beyond data that may be obtained from business records existing at the time of the offer, the business owner and condemning authority may agree on a schedule for the submission of such information.

As used in this paragraph, the term “business records” includes, but is not limited to, copies of federal income tax returns, federal income tax withholding statements, federal miscellaneous income tax statements, state sales tax returns, balance sheets, profit and loss statements, and state corporate income tax returns for the 5 years preceding notification which are attributable to the business operation on the property to be acquired, and other records relied upon by the business owner that substantiate the business damage claim.

Within 120 days after receipt of the good faith business damage offer and accompanying business records, the condemning authority must, by certified mail, accept or reject the business owner’s offer or make a counteroffer. Failure of the condemning authority to respond to the business damage offer, or rejection thereof pursuant to this section, must be deemed to be a counteroffer of zero dollars for purposes of subsequent application of s. 73.092(1).

At any time in the presuit negotiation process, the parties may agree to submit the compensation or business damage claims to nonbinding mediation. The parties shall agree upon a mediator certified under s. 44.102. In the event that there is a settlement reached as a result of mediation or other mutually acceptable dispute resolution procedure, the agreement reached shall be in writing. The written agreement provided for in this section shall incorporate by reference the right-of-way maps, construction plans, or other documents related to the taking upon which the settlement is based. In the event of a settlement, both parties shall have the same legal rights that would have been available under law if the matter had been resolved through eminent domain proceedings in circuit court with the maps, plans, or other documents having been made a part of the record.

If a settlement is reached between the condemning authority and a property or business owner prior to a lawsuit being filed, the property or business owner who settles compensation claims in lieu of condemnation shall be entitled to recover costs in the same manner as provided in s. 73.091 and attorney’s fees in the same manner as provided in s. 73.092, more specifically as follows:

Attorney’s fees for presuit negotiations under this section regarding the amount of compensation to be paid for the land, severance damages, and improvements must be calculated in the same manner as provided in s. 73.092(1) unless the parties otherwise agree.

If business damages are recovered by the business owner based on the condemning authority accepting the business owner’s initial offer or the business owner accepting the condemning authority’s initial counteroffer, attorney’s fees must be calculated in accordance with s. 73.092(2), (3), (4), and (5) for the attorney’s time incurred in presentation of the business owner’s good faith offer under paragraph (2)(c). Otherwise, attorney’s fees for the award of business damages must be calculated as provided in s.
TRANSPORTATION & TRANSIT
RIGHT OF WAY
1/22
73.092(1), based on the difference between the final judgment or settlement of business damages and the counteroffer to the business owner’s offer by the condemning authority.

Presuit costs must be presented, calculated, and awarded in the same manner as provided in s. 73.091, after submission by the business or property owner to the condemning authority of all appraisal reports, business damage reports, or other work products for which recovery is sought, and upon transfer of title of the real property by closing, upon payment of any amounts due for business damages, or upon final judgment.

If the parties cannot agree on the amount of costs and attorney’s fees to be paid by the condemning authority, the business or property owner may file a complaint in the circuit court in the county in which the property is located to recover attorney’s fees and costs.

This shall only apply when the action is by the Department of Transportation, county, municipality, board, district, or other public body for the condemnation of a road right-of-way.

Evidence of negotiations or of any written or oral statements used in mediation or negotiations between the parties under this section is inadmissible in any condemnation proceeding, except in a proceeding to determine reasonable costs and attorney’s fees.

History. —s. 57, ch. 99-385; s. 8, ch. 2001-256; s. 28, ch. 2016-233; s. 14, ch. 2020-2.

73.071 Jury trial; compensation; severance damages; business damages. —

When the action is at issue, and only upon notice and hearing to set the cause for trial, the court shall impanel a jury of 12 persons as soon as practical considering the reasonable necessities of the court and of the parties, and giving preference to the trial of eminent domain cases over other civil actions, and submit the issue of compensation to them for determination, which issue shall be tried in the same manner as other issues of fact are tried in the circuit courts.

The amount of such compensation shall be determined as of the date of trial, or the date upon which title passes, whichever shall occur first.

The jury shall determine solely the amount of compensation to be paid, which compensation shall include:

The value of the property sought to be appropriated.

Where less than the entire property is sought to be appropriated, any damages to the remainder caused by the taking, including, when the action is by the Department of Transportation, county, municipality, board, district or other public body for the condemnation of a right-of-way, and the effect of the taking of the property involved may damage or destroy an established business of more than 4 years’ standing before January 1, 2005, or the effect of the taking of the property involved may damage or destroy an established business of more than 5 years’ standing on or after January 1, 2005, owned by the party whose lands are being so taken, located upon adjoining lands owned or held by such party, the probable damages to such business which the denial of the use of the property so taken may reasonably cause; any person claiming the right to recover such special damages shall set forth in his or her written defenses the nature and extent of such damages; and
TRANSPORTATION & TRANSIT
RIGHT OF WAY
1/22
Where the appropriation is of property upon which a mobile home, other than a travel trailer as defined in s. 320.01, is located, whether or not the owner of the mobile home is an owner or lessee of the property involved, and the effect of the taking of the property involved requires the relocation of such mobile home, the reasonable removal or relocation expenses incurred by such mobile home owner, not to exceed the replacement value of such mobile home. The compensation paid to a mobile homeowner under this paragraph shall preclude an award to a mobile home park owner for such expenses of removal or relocation. Any mobile homeowner claiming the right to such removal or relocation expenses shall set forth in his or her written defenses the nature and extent of such expenses. This paragraph shall not apply to any governmental authority exercising its power of eminent domain when reasonable removal or relocation expenses must be paid to mobile homeowners under other provisions of law or agency rule applicable to such exercise of power.

When the action is by the Department of Transportation, county, municipality, board, district, or other public body for the condemnation of a road, canal, levee, or water control facility right-of-way, the enhancement, if any, in value of the remaining adjoining property of the defendant property owner by reason of the construction or improvement made or contemplated by the petitioner shall be offset against the damage, if any, resulting to such remaining adjoining property of the defendant property owner by reason of the construction or improvement. However, such enhancement in the value shall not be offset against the value of the property appropriated, and if such enhancement in value shall exceed the damage, if any, to the remaining adjoining property, there shall be no recovery over against such property owner for such excess.

Any increase or decrease in the value of any property to be acquired which occurs after the scope of the project for which the property is being acquired is known in the market, and which is solely a result of the knowledge of the project location, shall not be considered in arriving at the value of the property acquired. For the purpose of this section, the scope of the project for which the property is being acquired shall be presumed to be known in the market on or after the condemnor executes a resolution which depicts the location of the project.

The jury shall view the subject property upon demand by any party or by order of the court.

If the jury cannot agree on a verdict the court shall discharge them, impanel a new jury, and proceed with the trial.

History. —s. 1, ch. 65-369; ss. 23, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 1, ch. 70-283; s. 1, ch. 77-51; s. 19, ch. 79-400; s. 36,
ch. 85-180; s. 361, ch. 95-147; ss. 58, 59, ch. 99-385; ss. 56, 57, ch. 2002-20.

Costs of the proceedings. —

The petitioner shall pay attorney’s fees as provided in s. 73.092 as well as all reasonable costs incurred in the defense of the proceedings in the circuit court, including, but not limited to, reasonable appraisal fees and, when business damages are compensable, a reasonable accountant’s fee, to be assessed by that court. No prejudgment interest shall be paid on costs or attorney’s fees.

At least 30 days prior to a hearing to assess costs under this section, the condemnee’s attorney shall submit to the condemning authority for each expert witness complete time records and a detailed statement of services rendered by date, nature of services performed, time spent performing such services,
TRANSPORTATION & TRANSIT
RIGHT OF WAY
1/22
and costs incurred, and a copy of any fee agreement which may exist between the expert and the condemnee or the condemnee’s attorney.

In assessing costs, the court shall consider all factors relevant to the reasonableness of the costs, including, but not limited to, the fees paid to similar experts retained in the case by the condemning authority or other parties and the reasonable costs of similar services by similarly qualified persons.

In assessing costs to be paid by the petitioner, the court shall be guided by the amount the defendant would ordinarily have been expected to pay for the services rendered if the petitioner were not responsible for the costs.
The court shall make specific findings that justify each sum awarded as an expert witness fee. History. —s. 1, ch. 65-369; s. 2, ch. 87-148; s. 52, ch. 90-136; s. 1, ch. 90-303; s. 2, ch. 94-162; s. 60, ch.
99-385.

Attorney’s fees. —

Except as otherwise provided in this section and s. 73.015, the court, in eminent domain proceedings, shall award attorney’s fees based solely on the benefits achieved for the client.

As used in this section, the term “benefits” means the difference, exclusive of interest, between the final judgment or settlement and the last written offer made by the condemning authority before the defendant hires an attorney. If no written offer is made by the condemning authority before the defendant hires an attorney, benefits must be measured from the first written offer after the attorney is hired.

In determining attorney’s fees, if business records as defined in s. 73.015(2)(c)2. and kept by the owner in the ordinary course of business were provided to the condemning authority to substantiate the business damage offer in s. 73.015(2)(c), benefits for amounts awarded for business damages must be based on the difference between the final judgment or settlement and the written counteroffer made by the condemning authority provided in s. 73.015(2)(d).

In determining attorney’s fees, if existing business records as defined in s. 73.015(2)(c)2. and kept by the owner in the ordinary course of business were not provided to the condemning authority to substantiate the business damage offer in s. 73.015(2)(c) and those records which were not provided are later deemed material to the determination of business damages, benefits for amounts awarded for business damages must be based upon the difference between the final judgment or settlement and the first written counteroffer made by the condemning authority within 90 days from the condemning authority’s receipt of the business records previously not provided.

The court may also consider nonmonetary benefits obtained for the client through the efforts of the attorney, to the extent such nonmonetary benefits are specifically identified by the court and can, within a reasonable degree of certainty, be quantified.

Attorney’s fees based on benefits achieved shall be awarded in accordance with the following schedule:

Thirty-three percent of any benefit up to $250,000; plus
TRANSPORTATION & TRANSIT
RIGHT OF WAY
1/22

Twenty-five percent of any portion of the benefit between $250,000 and $1 million; plus

Twenty percent of any portion of the benefit exceeding $1 million.

In assessing attorney’s fees incurred in defeating an order of taking, or for apportionment, or other supplemental proceedings, when not otherwise provided for, the court shall consider:

The novelty, difficulty, and importance of the questions involved.

The skill employed by the attorney in conducting the cause.

The amount of money involved.

The responsibility incurred and fulfilled by the attorney.

The attorney’s time and labor reasonably required adequately to represent the client in relation to the benefits resulting to the client.

The fee, or rate of fee, customarily charged for legal services of a comparable or similar nature.

Any attorney’s fee award made under subsection (1).

In determining the amount of attorney’s fees to be paid by the petitioner under subsection (2), the court shall be guided by the fees the defendant would ordinarily be expected to pay for these services if the petitioner were not responsible for the payment of those fees.

At least 30 days prior to a hearing to assess attorney’s fees under subsection (2), the condemnee’s attorney shall submit to the condemning authority and to the court complete time records and a detailed statement of services rendered by date, nature of services performed, time spent performing such services, and costs incurred.

The defendant shall provide to the court a copy of any fee agreement that may exist between the defendant and his or her attorney, and the court must reduce the amount of attorney’s fees to be paid by the defendant by the amount of any attorney’s fees awarded by the court.

History. —s. 1, ch. 76-158; s. 37, ch. 85-180; s. 3, ch. 87-148; s. 54, ch. 90-136; s. 3, ch. 90-303; s. 3, ch.
94-162; s. 1370, ch. 95-147; s. 61, ch. 99-385.

PROJECT: PARCEL: O&E: TAX I.D.:

PROPERTY OWNER QUESTIONNAIRE
TRANSPORTATION & TRANSIT
RIGHT OF WAY
6/21

PARTIN SETTLEMENT ROAD
PS 728A/728B/728C/828A/828B
TBD
20-25-30-4829-0001-00D0
20-25-30-4829-0001-00C0
20-25-30-4829-0001-00E0

Dear Property Owner:

Please provide the following information and return in the envelope provided.

Are you the owner of the property identified above? 	
I have	 sold all or	 part of the property to:
Name: 	 Address: 	 Date Sold: 	

Other than my spouse, I share ownership of this property with:
Name: 	 Address: 	 Phone No.: 	

Please list the appropriate contact for this property:
Name: 	 Address: 	 Phone No.: 	

Is there an ongoing business on this property? 	

If yes, who owns the business?
Name: 	 Address: 	 Phone No.: 	

Additional Comments: 	

Property Owner’s Signature	Date

Printed Name and Title

BUSINESS OWNER QUESTIONNAIRE
TRANSPORTATION & TRANSIT
RIGHT OF WAY 6/21

Project Number:	  County Road Number: 		  County:		 Parcel Number: 	 Attention:	 

Dear Business Owner:

Please complete the following information and mail to this office.

Name of the business and a brief description of the business operation:	

Are you the owner of the business operating at this site? 		 If yes, how long have you been in business? 	

I have sold all 	or part	of the business. Approximate date sold 			
The business was sold to:
Name:	  Address:	

If you share ownership of this business, please list the other owners. (Use reverse side if necessary)
Name:	  Address:	

Please identify the appropriate contact person for your business.
Name and Title:		 Address: 	  Telephone #:	

Do you anticipate filing a business damage claim?	

Additional Comments:	  (use reverse side if necessary)	

Business Owner’s Signature	Date

Printed Name	Title

OSCEOLA COUNTY
BUSINESS SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE
TRANSPORTATION & TRANSIT RIGHT OF WAY / 6/21

TYPE OF BUSINESS:	FARM	BUSINESS	NONPROFIT	PROJECT #: PS-20-11504-DG		
NAME & ADDRESS OF BUSINESS:	TELEPHONE NO.:	PROJECT NAME: PARTIN SETTLEMENT RD	
		FAP #:	N/A	
	# OF EMPLOYEES:		
		COUNTY ROAD #:	
EMAIL:	COUNTY:	OSCEOLA		
RACE:	WHITE	BLACK	HISPANIC		ASIAN AMERICAN/PACIFIC ISLANDER AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE	UNDISCLOSED	PARCEL #:  PS 728A/728B/728C/828A/828B		
SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP
Citizen of the United States	National of the United States	Alien lawfully present in the United States
(Documentation required)
CORPORATION
Business is authorized to conduct business in the United States

PARTNERSHIPS OR ASSOCIATIONS NOT INCORPORATED/EACH PERSON IS:
Citizen of the United States	National of the United States	Alien lawfully present in the United States
(Documentation required)			
SOLE PROPRIETOR	PARTNERSHIP	CORPORATION	FRANCHISE	CHAIN			
NAME OF OWNER(S)/OFFICERS OF CORPORATION:	TITLE:		
TYPE OF BUSINESS:	NATURE OF CLIENTELE:			
LENGTH OF TIME IN OPERATION AT THIS SITE:			
WHAT ARE CURRENT LEASE TERMS AND OTHER CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS?			
RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF PRESENT LOCATION:			
DESCRIBE MANUFACTURING PROCESS (IF APPLICABLE):			
IS ANY PERSONAL PROPERTY ON SITE OWNED BY OTHER THAN THE OCCUPANT?	YES	NO			
IF YES, NAME & ADDRESS OF OWNER:	DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY:		
NET EARNINGS LAST TWO (2) TAXABLE YEARS: 	 $ 			 $ 				
IS THIS OPERATION PART OF AN ENTERPRISE WHICH HAS ANOTHER ESTABLISHMENT NOT BEING ACQUIRED BY FDOT?
YES	NO			
DO YOU PLAN TO:	RELOCATE BUSINESS	TERMINATE BUSINESS			
IS THERE ADEQUATE REMAINING PROPERTY TO RELOCATE BUSINESS TO?	YES	NO			
DO YOU THINK LOCATING A REPLACEMENT SITE WILL BE DIFFICULT?	YES	NO IF YES, WHY?			
DESCRIBE SUITABLE REPLACEMENT PROPERTY, INCLUDING:
PRICE 		SQ. FT. OF BLDG 		ZONING 	 RENTAL RATE 		PARCEL SIZE 		PERMITS 				
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS:	SHIPPING	PARKING	POWER	SEWAGE OTHER COMMENTS:			
IS THE BUSINESS FINANCIALLY ABLE TO SUPPORT THE MOVE?	YES	NO			
ARE ADVANCE RELOCATION PAYMENTS REQUIRED FOR THE MOVE?	YES	NO			
SECTION OF CITY/COUNTY PREFERRED & WHY?			
REFERRALS: SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION:	YES	NO	DATE:
OTHER ASSISTING AGENCY(IES):	DATE:			
TRANSPORTATION & TRANSIT RIGHT OF WAY / 6/21

WHAT IS THE TIME REQUIRED TO VACATE?	
WILL OUTSIDE SPECIALIST BE NEEDED FOR PLANNING, MOVING OR REINSTALLATION OF
MACHINERY/PERSONAL PROPERTY?	YES	NO	
HAVE POTENTIAL REALTY/PERSONALTY ISSUES BEEN IDENTIFIED/RESOLVED?
(SIGNAGE, EQUIPMENT OR OTHER)	YES	NO	
SEWER:	MUNICIPAL SEWER SERVICE	STORMWATER DRAINAGE SYSTEM
SEPTIC TANK AND/OR DRAINFIELD (INDUSTRIAL WASTE), IF SEPARATE FROM SANITARY SEPTIC TANK AND/OR DRAINFIELD (SANITARY)	
DRINKING WATER:	CITY WATER	PRIVATE UTILITY	PRIVATE WELL	BOTTLED	
WHAT CHEMICALS DO YOU USE AND/OR STORE ON THIS SITE? WHAT IS THEIR USE AND NATURE?	
IS THIS BUSINESS A:
REGISTERED HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATOR?		YES	NO EPA-DEP # 	
REGISTERED SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR?		YES	NO EPA-DEP # 	
CONDITIONALLY EXEMPT SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR?	YES	NO EPA-DEP # 		
ARE YOU PERMITTED BY ANY ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATING AUTHORITY?	YES	NO IF YES, NAME OF AGENCY:	PERMIT NUMBER:	
DO YOU OWN ANY ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMERS ON THIS SITE?	YES	NO ARE THERE ANY MATERIALS CONTAINING ASBESTOS ON THIS SITE?	YES	NO	
STORAGE TANK INFORMATION:
There are no tanks on this parcel.
There are tanks on this parcel, but not used or owned by this business.
See:    (DOT parcel/tenant number) for tank information. This business uses storage tanks on this site (see info. below).
Tanks are owned by: this business 	 (name/DOT parcel). Groundwater monitoring wells are on this site. Date installed: 		 The tanks are registered with FDEP Registration Number: 		

INDIVIDUAL TANK INFORMATION:
CAPACITY		TANK		TANK		YEAR	LENGTH		OVERFILL		ABOVE-OR (GALLONS)	CONTENTS	CONSTRUCTION	INSTALLED	 OF USE	PROTECTION?	UNDERGROUND

	 	     		 		 		 		 		 	

INSTRUCTIONS TO AGENT COMPLETING THE SURVEY:
If possible, provide a site sketch w/approximate tank locations.
For “LENGTH OF USE”, enter how long this company has been using tanks.	
OWNER/OCCUPANT COMMENTS:	
AGENT COMMENTS:	

PRINT NAME OF PERSON WHO GAVE INFORMATION	PRINT NAME OF PERSON WHO OBTAINED INFORMATION

SIGNATURE	DATE	SIGNATURE	DATE
Uhl
CLARK & ALBAUGH, LLP

SCOTT D. CLARK

April 22, 2022

Via U.S. Mail

Osceola County Transportation and Transit Department I Courthouse Square, Suite 3100
Kissimmee, FL 34741

ATTENTION: Sally Myers, Right-of-Way & Asset Manager

Re: Partin Settlement Road Improvements

Dear Ms. Myers:

This firms serves as District Counsel to the Remington Community Development District and, as such, was forwarded your letter dated January 12, 2022, regarding the referenced matter.

In the future, please send all correspondence on this matter to our attention. We appreciate your cooperation in this regard.
Very truly yours,
CLARK ,, ALBAUGH, LLP

Scott D. Clark For the Firm

SOC/ma cc: Client

700 \V. Morse Boulevard, Suite IOI Winter Park, Florida 32789
Phone: (407) 647-7600
www.winterparklawyers.com

,F,O,R,E,V,E,R,,/ ,U,S,A

American Acquisition Group, LLC 711 N. Sherrill Street, Suite B Tampa, FL 33609

APPRAISAL REPORT

Parcel:	PS728/PS828
County Road No.:	523
County:	Osceola
Fiscal Contract Number:	PS-20-11504-DG

Prepared for:

Mr. David A. Shontz, Esq.
Shutts & Bowen, LLP
300 South Orange Avenue, Suite 1600
Orlando, Florida 32806

Prepared By:

Kristin L. Soltys, MAI
State-Certified General Real Estate Appraiser RZ3227

Owner/Principal Appraiser Eminent Valuations, PLLC 2202 Curry Ford Road, Suite C Orlando, Florida 32806

August 11, 2022

Mr. David A. Shontz, Esq.
Shutts & Bowen, LLP
300 South Orange Avenue, Suite 1600
Orlando, Florida 32806

RE:	Parcel:	PS728/PS828
Fiscal Contract No:	PS-20-11504-DG
County Road No.:	523
County:	Osceola

Dear Mr. Shontz:

Pursuant to your request, I am submitting an Appraisal Report for the above-referenced acquisition with an effective date of July 19, 2022, which coincides with the last inspection of the property appraised.

This report is based upon my personal inspection of the property appraised. Additionally, this appraisal complies with Section 6.2, Supplemental Standards of Appraisal, as set forth in the Florida Department of Transportation Right-of-Way Manual, Section 5-C, Supplemental Standards of Appraisal, Osceola County Public Works Right-of-Way Manual, and the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) as promulgated by the Appraisal Standards Board of The Appraisal Foundation and referenced in Section 475.628, Florida Statutes, (F.S.).

If you or others should have any questions concerning this appraisal, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Respectfully submitted,

Kristin L. Soltys, MAI
State-Certified General Real Estate Appraiser RZ3227

kristin@eminentvaluations.com	(321) 445-1767	eminentvaluations.com
100  CERTIFICATE OF VALUE

Fiscal Contract No.:	PS-20-11504-DG	
County Road:	CR 523 (Partin Settlement Road)	
County:	Osceola	
Parcel No.:	PS828	
I certify to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct.
The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions and are my personal, unbiased, professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions.
I have no present or prospective interest in the property or bias with respect to the property that is the subject of this report, and I have no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved. My engagement in this assignment was not contingent upon developing or reporting predetermined results.
I have performed no services as an appraiser, or in any other capacity, regarding the property that is the subject of this report within the three-year period immediately preceding the agreement to perform this assignment.
My compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon the development or reporting of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value opinion, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the intended use of this appraisal.
My analyses, opinions, or conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice and the provisions of Chapter 475, Part II, Florida Statutes.
I have made a personal inspection of the property that is the subject of this report, and I have afforded the property owner the opportunity to accompany me at the time of the inspection. I have also made a personal field inspection of the comparable sales relied upon in making this appraisal. The subject and the comparable sales relied upon in making this appraisal were as represented by the photographs contained in this appraisal.
No persons other than those named on the supplemental certificate of this report, provided significant real property appraisal assistance to the person signing this certification.
I understand that this appraisal is to be used for the acquisition of right of way for a transportation facility to be constructed by Osceola County with the possible assistance of Federal or State funds.
This appraisal has been made in conformity with the appropriate State laws, regulations, policies, and procedures applicable to appraisal of right of way for transportation purposes; and, to the best of my knowledge, no portion of the property value entered on this certificate consists of items which are non-compensable under the established law of the State of Florida.
I have not revealed the findings or results of this appraisal to anyone other than the proper officials of Osceola County, and I will not do so until so authorized by State officials, or until due process of law requires me, or until I am released from this obligation by having publicly testified as to such findings.
Regardless of any stated limiting condition or assumption, I acknowledge that this appraisal report and all maps, data, summaries, charts, and other exhibits collected or prepared under this agreement shall become the property of Osceola County without restriction or limitation on their use.
Statements supplemental to this certification required by membership or candidacy in a professional appraisal organization are described on an addendum to this certificate and, by reference, are made a part hereof.

Based upon my independent appraisal and the exercise of my professional judgment, my opinion of the market value for the part taken, including net severance damages after special benefits, if any, of the property appraised as of July 19, 2022, is: TWENTY-NINE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED ($29,500) DOLLARS.

Market value should be allocated as follows:

LAND:	
$ 2,400	
LAND AREA: (Ac/SF)	Part A: 1,928 SF Part B:	147 SF
 Total:	2,075 SF		
IMPROVEMENTS:	 $ 4,500				
NET DAMAGES &/ OR
COST TO CURE:	
 $22,600		
Land Use (HABU as vacant):	
 Residential Development		
TOTAL:	 $29,500				

August 11, 2022				
DATE		Kristin L. Soltys, MAI		
		State-Certified General Real Estate Appraiser RZ3227		
CERTIFICATE OF VALUE

Fiscal Contract No.:	PS-20-11504-DG	
County Road:	CR 523 (Partin Settlement Road)	
County:	Osceola	
Parcel No.:	PS728	
I certify to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct.
The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions and are my personal, unbiased, professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions.
I have no present or prospective interest in the property or bias with respect to the property that is the subject of this report, and I have no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved. My engagement in this assignment was not contingent upon developing or reporting predetermined results.
I have performed no services as an appraiser, or in any other capacity, regarding the property that is the subject of this report within the three-year period immediately preceding the agreement to perform this assignment.
My compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon the development or reporting of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value opinion, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the intended use of this appraisal.
My analyses, opinions, or conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice and the provisions of Chapter 475, Part II, Florida Statutes.
I have made a personal inspection of the property that is the subject of this report, and I have afforded the property owner the opportunity to accompany me at the time of the inspection. I have also made a personal field inspection of the comparable sales relied upon in making this appraisal. The subject and the comparable sales relied upon in making this appraisal were as represented by the photographs contained in this appraisal.
No persons other than those named on the supplemental certificate of this report, provided significant real property appraisal assistance to the person signing this certification.
I understand that this appraisal is to be used for the acquisition of right of way for a transportation facility to be constructed by Osceola County with the possible assistance of Federal or State funds.
This appraisal has been made in conformity with the appropriate State laws, regulations, policies, and procedures applicable to appraisal of right of way for transportation purposes; and, to the best of my knowledge, no portion of the property value entered on this certificate consists of items which are non-compensable under the established law of the State of Florida.
I have not revealed the findings or results of this appraisal to anyone other than the proper officials of Osceola County, and I will not do so until so authorized by State officials, or until due process of law requires me, or until I am released from this obligation by having publicly testified as to such findings.
Regardless of any stated limiting condition or assumption, I acknowledge that this appraisal report and all maps, data, summaries, charts, and other exhibits collected or prepared under this agreement shall become the property of Osceola County without restriction or limitation on their use.
Statements supplemental to this certification required by membership or candidacy in a professional appraisal organization are described on an addendum to this certificate and, by reference, are made a part hereof.

Based upon my independent appraisal and the exercise of my professional judgment, my opinion of the market value for the part taken, including net severance damages after special benefits, if any, of the property appraised as of July 19, 2022, is: FIFTY-NINE THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED ($59,100) DOLLARS.

Market value should be allocated as follows:

LAND:	
$ 9,800	
LAND AREA: (Ac/SF)	Part A: 6,427 SF Part B: 3,272 SF Part C: 2,562 SF
 Total: 12,261 SF		
IMPROVEMENTS:	 $49,300				
NET DAMAGES &/ OR
COST TO CURE:	
$	0	
Land Use (HABU as vacant):	
 Residential Development		
TOTAL:	 $59,100				

August 11, 2022				
DATE		Kristin L. Soltys, MAI		
		State-Certified General Real Estate Appraiser RZ3227		
CERTIFICATION ADDENDUM
I certify to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:
the reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared in conformity with the requirements of the Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of Professional Practice of the Appraisal Institute;
the use of this report is subject to the requirements of the Appraisal Institute relating to review by its duly authorized representatives;
as of the date of this report, I, Kristin L. Soltys, MAI, have completed the requirements of the continuing education program of the Appraisal Institute;
I have over 20 years of real estate experience in the State of Florida including 16 years as a certified appraiser. I can properly identify the appraisal problem for this assignment; I have the knowledge and experience to complete this assignment competently; and I recognize and have followed, the laws and regulations that apply to me as the appraiser and this appraisal assignment.
this appraisal has been prepared in conformance with Section 6.2, Supplemental Standards of Appraisal, as set forth in the Florida Department of Transportation Right-of-Way Manual and Section 5-C, Supplemental Standards of Appraisal, Osceola County Public Works Right- of-Way Manual;
I, Kristin L. Soltys, am a State-Certified General Real Estate Appraiser RZ3227 in the State of Florida. My certification expires November 30, 2022. I have made a personal inspection of the property that is the subject of this report.
Kathrine G. Tribbey substantially contributed to the research, inspections, and the writing of this appraisal report under the direction of Mrs. Soltys. Kathrine G. Tribbey is a State- Registered Trainee Appraiser RI24061 by the State of Florida and is under my direct supervision (Contributed: 45 Hours).
Jessica M. Martinez substantially contributed to the research, inspections, and the writing of this appraisal report under the direction of Mrs. Soltys. Jessica M. Martinez is a State- Registered Trainee Appraiser RI25026 by the State of Florida and is under my direct supervision (Contributed: 6 Hours).
I, Kristin L. Soltys, MAI, accept full and complete responsibility for any work performed by the registered-trainee appraisers named in this report as if it were my own work.
the following sub-consultants provided professional assistance to the appraiser signing this report:
Company Name	Contact	Title	
Halff Associates, Inc.	Joseph Loretta, PLA,
LEED®AP-BD+C	Land Planner	
	Michael Osipov, PE, PSM	Engineer	
	Sean Lahav	Resiliency Planner	
Intracoastal Builders Corporation	Matthew Reimer	General Contractor	
Southeastern Surveying and Mapping Corp.	Edwin Munoz, Jr., PSM	Surveyor	
	 August 11, 2022
Kristin L. Soltys, MAI	Date
State-Certified General Real Estate Appraiser RZ3227 Eminent Valuations, PLLC
110	TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION AND PREMISE OF THE APPRAISAL
100	CERTIFICATE OF VALUE	3
110	TABLE OF CONTENTS	6
115	ASSUMPTIONS, LIMITING CONDITIONS, AND CERTIFICATIONS	8
120	SUMMARY OF SALIENT FACTS AND CONCLUSIONS	10
130	TYPE OF APPRAISAL AND REPORT FORMAT	11
140	PURPOSE, INTENDED USE, AND INTENDED USER	11
150	DEFINITION OF MARKET VALUE	11
160	PROPERTY RIGHTS APPRAISED	12
175	SCOPE OF WORK	12
180	APPRAISAL PROBLEM	13
PRESENTATION OF DATA	13
200	IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTY AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION	13
220	DESCRIPTION OF AREA AND NEIGHBORHOOD	15
230	DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY, PHOTOGRAPHS, AND SKETCHES	18
235	EXISTING TRANSPORTATION FACILITY DESCRIPTION	31
240	ZONING, LAND-USE PLAN, AND CONCURRENCY	31
250	ASSESSED VALUE, TAXES, AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS	33
260	HISTORY OF PROPERTY	33
270	EXPOSURE TIME	33
280	PUBLIC AND PRIVATE RESTRICTIONS	34
ANALYSIS OF DATA AND CONCLUSIONS	34
300	HIGHEST AND BEST USE ANALYSIS	34
302	HIGHEST AND BEST USE CONCLUSIONS	36
305	APPROACHES TO VALUE USED AND EXCLUDED	36
310	LAND VALUATION	36
390	RECONCILIATION OF VALUE INDICATIONS AND VALUE CONCLUSION	42
395	ALLOCATION OF LAND, SITE IMPROVEMENTS, STRUCTURES, AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS	42
DESCRIPTION AND VALUATION OF PART ACQUIRED	42
460	DESCRIPTION OF PERMANENT EASEMENT ACQUIRED – PARCEL PS828	42
470	VALUATION OF PERMANENT EASEMENT ACQUIRED – PARCEL PS828	44
480	DESCRIPTION OF TEMPORARY EASEMENT ACQUIRED – PARCEL PS728	46
490	VALUATION OF TEMPORARY EASEMENT ACQUIRED – PARCEL PS728	48
495	TOTAL VALUE OF LAND AND IMPROVEMENTS ACQUIRED	55
VALUATION OF REMAINDER AS PART OF THE WHOLE	55
500	VALUE OF REMAINDER AS PART OF WHOLE PROPERTY	55
TABLE OF CONTENTS - Continued
PREMISES OF THE APPRAISAL – THE REMAINDER	55
640U PURPOSE OF APPRAISAL REMAINDER UNCURED	55
640C  PURPOSE OF APPRAISAL OF REMAINDER CURED	55
680U APPRAISAL PROBLEM FOR REMAINDER UNCURED	56
PRESENTATION OF DATA-THE REMAINDER	56
730C  DESCRIPTION OF REMAINDER	56
740C  ZONING, LAND USE PLAN, AND CONCURRENCY	56
750C PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION FACILITY DESCRIPTION	56
775C  EFFECT OF ACQUISITION ON REMAINDER	57
ANALYSIS OF DATA AND CONCLUSIONS–REMAINDER	57
800C  HIGHEST AND BEST USE OF THE REMAINDER	57
802C  HIGHEST AND BEST USE CONCLUSION OF THE REMAINDER	57
805C  APPROACHES TO VALUE USED AND EXCLUDED FOR REMAINDER	58
810C  LAND VALUATION	58
900U SUPPORT FOR DAMAGES/NO DAMAGES TO THE REMAINDER	58
910	COST TO CURE	58
920	SPECIAL BENEFITS	60
995	SUMMARY OF VALUES	60
ADDENDA	61
NEIGHBORHOOD PHOTOGRAPHS	62
DESCRIPTION OF AREA AND NEIGHBORHOOD	63
COMPARABLE LAND SALE LOCATION MAP AND SALE DATA SHEETS	74
HALFF ASSOCIATES, INC.–LAND PLANNING AND ENGINEERING ANALYSIS
.	106
INTRACOASTAL BUILDERS CORP. – GENERAL CONTRACTOR’S REPORT	123
USDA WEB SOIL SURVEY	131
SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION(S)	132
LAST INSTRUMENT OF CONVEYANCE	142
PROPERTY OWNER CONTACT LETTER	148
APPRAISER’S QUALIFICATIONS	149
115	ASSUMPTIONS, LIMITING CONDITIONS, AND CERTIFICATIONS
To highlight the frame of reference in which this appraisal was made, the more significant assumptions and limiting conditions are listed below. Additional discussion or amplification, if warranted, will be included in other sections of this report.

This appraisal is based upon the condition of the national economy, the purchasing power of the dollar, and available financing as of the date of value.

No responsibility is assumed for matters legal in nature, nor is this report to be construed as rendering an opinion of title which is assumed to be good.

The property has been appraised as though under competent management, fully merchantable, and under responsible ownership without regard to any existing encumbrances or liens except as noted herein.

All facts set forth in this report are true and accurate to the best of the appraiser's knowledge. Information furnished by others is believed to be reliable but not guaranteed.

A copy of this report does not carry with it the right of publication, nor may it be used for any purpose by anyone but Osceola County without the previous authorization of the appraiser and Osceola County. If consent is granted, the report must be used in its entirety.

Neither all nor any part of the contents of this report (particularly the conclusion as to value, the identity of the appraiser or the firm with which she is connected, or any reference to the Appraisal Institute) shall be disseminated to the public through advertising media, public relations media, news media, sales media, or any other public means of communication without the prior written consent and approval of the appraiser and Osceola County.

Considerable data was compiled during the appraisal process. The data contained in the appraisal work file is made a part of this appraisal by reference and the sub-consultant reports, if any, are made a part of this appraisal report by attachment.

The effects of concurrency have been considered based on the property as vacant. The appropriate governing agencies have been contacted, and the requirements and limitations have been discussed. This appraisal is made in lieu of a written commitment from the governing agencies in charge of permitting development; however, I have found that no adverse conditions exist that would hinder the issuance of a commitment under the regulations of concurrency.

This appraisal relies upon title work, right-of-way maps, and construction plans provided by the client.
ASSUMPTIONS, LIMITING CONDITIONS, AND CERTIFICATIONS (Continued)

An extraordinary assumption is an assignment-specific assumption as of the effective date regarding uncertain information used in an analysis, which if found to be false, could alter the appraiser’s opinions or conclusions. A hypothetical condition is a condition, directly related to a specific assignment, which is contrary to what is known by the appraiser to exist on the effective date of the assignment results but is used for the purpose of analysis.

The hypothetical conditions and extraordinary assumptions relied upon for this analysis are described as follows:

This appraisal includes a valuation of land and affected improvements only and is as if there are no other improvements on-site.

The appraisal of the remainder is made under the assumption that the acquisition has taken place, the transportation facility has been completed per the construction plans, said facility is open for public use, and the temporary construction easement has expired.

The use of the aforementioned extraordinary assumptions and/or hypothetical conditions affect the assignment results but are necessary for the purpose of analysis and producing credible assignment results.
120	SUMMARY OF SALIENT FACTS AND CONCLUSIONS
Owner Name, Address, and Other Contact Information (if any):
Remington Community Development District c/o: Governmental Management Services 219 E. Livingston Street
Orlando, Florida 32801-1508
(407) 647-7600 – Scott Clark, Property Owner’s Attorney

Property Address and Location:
The property is in the northeast quadrant of Partin Settlement Road (CR 523) and Florida’s Turnpike, and on the north side of the intersection of Partin Settlement Road and Remington Boulevard, in an unincorporated area of Kissimmee, Osceola County, Florida. The property is common area for a residential subdivision and does not have a physical address.

Size of Parent Tract, Acquisition Parcel, and Remainder Property:
The parent tract is comprised of three tax parcels that represent common area for the Remington – Phase 2 Subdivision, which is platted under Plat Book 11, Page 28 of the Public Records of Osceola County.

The size of the parent tract is from public record and the size of the valuation tract is from the Remington – Phase 2 Subdivision Plat. The client has provided Sketch of Descriptions, prepared by Southeastern Surveying and Mapping Corporation, for the size of the acquisition parcels. The acquisitions involve easement acquisitions that will not result in a reduction in land size. As such, the remainder size is the same as the parent tract size.

A dividend or multiple of 43,560 square feet has been utilized to convert the units of measure. Please see Section 180, Appraisal Problem for additional discussion of the parent tract and valuation tract.

Valuation Tract:

Parent Tract (Common Area):	199.850 Acres

11.830 Acres	8,705,466 Square Feet

515,315 Square Feet	
Acquisition Parcel PS728:	0.281 Acres	12,261 Square Feet	
Acquisition Parcel PS828:	0.048 Acres	2,075 Square Feet	
Remainder Tract:	11.830 Acres	515,315 Square Feet	
Property Type and Description:
The parent tract includes three tax parcels that are dedicated as common area for a platted residential subdivision. This appraisal is limited to the valuation of the land and affected improvements only and is as if there are no other improvements on-site.
Extent of Field Inspection:
A formal inspection was conducted on February 28, 2022. For the inspections, the property was observed and photographed from the right of way and those interior portions of the parent tract/acquisition areas that were accessible by foot were walked by the appraiser. This inspection also involved locating the acquisition parcels, making note of any affected site improvements, and analyzing potential impacts on the remainder property.

An additional inspection was made by the appraiser from the right of way on July 19, 2022, which is the effective date of value of this appraisal. An inspection letter was sent to the property owner; however, no response was received, and no one was in attendance for the inspection on behalf of the property owner. A list of all those present at the initial site inspection on February 28, 2022, is as follows:

Kristin L. Soltys, MAI – Appraiser of Record Kathrine Tribbey – Registered Trainee Appraiser Michael Osipov – Engineer
Sean Lahav – Resiliency Planner Matthew Reimer – General Contractor
Richard MacMillan – Consultant Review Appraiser Steve Cross – Acquisition Agent
Rossana Ascencio – Acquisition Agent

130	TYPE OF APPRAISAL AND REPORT FORMAT
This is an Appraisal Report as defined by Standards Rule 2-2(a) of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. It is presented in a narrative report format and includes a valuation of the parent tract, the part acquired, the remainder, and damages or special benefits, if any. Pursuant to the Osceola County’s Scope of Services for Parcel PS728/PS828, which is part of the appraisal contract for this assignment, this appraisal involves a valuation of the land and affected site improvements, if any. Additional details can be found in Section 115, 175, and 180 of this report.

140	PURPOSE, INTENDED USE, AND INTENDED USER
The purpose of this appraisal is to develop and report an opinion of market value. The intended use of this acquisition appraisal is to assist Osceola County with establishing recommended compensation, for the part acquired for a right-of-way improvement project. The client for this assignment is Mr. David Shontz of Shutts & Bowen, LLP, who is acting as an authorized agent for Osceola County. The intended user of this appraisal is the Osceola County Board of County Commissioners, Transportation and Transit Department. No one else is permitted to use or rely on this appraisal for any other purpose than that stated.

150	DEFINITION OF MARKET VALUE
Per the Florida Department of Transportation Right-of-Way Manual, Supplemental Standards of Appraisal, the value contained within this report is based on the following definition of market value:

“Value, as used in eminent domain statute, ordinarily means amount which would be paid for property on assessing date to willing seller not compelled to sell, by willing purchaser, not compelled to purchase, taking into consideration all uses to which property is adapted and might reasonably be applied.”

160	PROPERTY RIGHTS APPRAISED
Fee-simple interest as encumbered only by zoning regulations and any public or private easements and restrictions of record and those rights associated with the proposed temporary construction easement. No value consideration has been given to tenant owned improvements, real property interests previously conveyed, or non-realty items (if any).

175	SCOPE OF WORK
The scope of work for this assignment includes a valuation of the parent tract (land and affected improvements), the parts acquired, the remainder property, and damages or special benefits, if any.

Research for this appraisal was performed during an 18-week period preceding the date of this appraisal report. The scope of work included: observing the subject property and surrounding neighborhood, investigating the market, researching the history of the subject property, researching sales of comparable properties, and talking to brokers, buyers, and sellers of properties that are similar to the subject. No one other than those persons listed in the Certificate Addendum of this report contributed to this analysis.

Sources of the data used include the public records of Osceola County, the Osceola County Property Appraiser’s website, MapWise, Stellar MLS, MLS Advantage, the South Florida Water Management District, the USDA Online Web Soil Survey, the National Wetland Inventory Maps, FEMA, RPR – Realtors Property Report, the Site to Do Business, FDOT Traffic Online, CoStar, and FRED-Federal Reserve Economic Data.

Halff Associates, Inc. has prepared property sketches showing the parent tract, part acquired, and remainder property; analyzed the impacts of the acquisition on the remainder property; and assisted with formulating a cost to cure for the remainder property, if any. Additionally, Halff Associates, Inc. has analyzed the development potential of the property before and after the acquisition; and provided an interpretation of zoning and land use regulations as they relate to the property appraised.

Intracoastal Builders Corporation has prepared a replacement cost new estimate for site improvements affected by the acquisition, and a cost to cure the remainder, if any.

Southeastern Surveying and Mapping Corporation has prepared the Sketch of Descriptions provided for this assignment by the client.
The appraiser also relied upon verbal information provided by representatives from the Osceola County planning and zoning departments and the title work, sketch of descriptions, right-of-way maps, and construction plans provided by the client.

The appraiser has verified and analyzed the collected data and developed reasonable value conclusions for the property appraised using appraisal techniques accepted and promulgated by the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice and the Appraisal Institute. The methodology used in the appraisal, the steps taken in the appraisal process, and the conclusions reached were then set forth in this appraisal report.

180	APPRAISAL PROBLEM
The parent tract represents an 11.830-acre portion of common area that serves a 199.850-acre low-density residential subdivision development known as Remington – Phase 2. After analyzing the acquisition as it relates to the common area and the overall subdivision development, it has been determined that the acquisition will not result in severance damages. As such, the appraisal problem will involve developing and reporting an opinion of the market value for the land and affected improvements, if any. For the purpose of this analysis, the term parent tract refers to the land and affected improvements, only.

The common area has an irregular shape and is reserved for common area improvements including landscaping, utilities, and the likes. When considering the property, as vacant, the common area is not able to support independent economic development; however, it is reasoned that it would be worth no less than the entitled but undeveloped residential land it serves. So, for the purpose of analysis, the appraiser will utilize the 199.850-acre subdivision tract as a basis for developing the unit value of the parent tract and the parts acquired. A discussion of the appraisal methodology applied and the approaches to value used can be found in Section 305 of this report.

As discussed in the body of this report, there are no severance damages to the land as a result of the acquisition; however, a minor cost to cure is required to reestablish/reconfigure the affected site improvements on the remainder property.

PRESENTATION OF DATA
200	IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTY AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION
The property is in the northeast quadrant of Partin Settlement Road (CR 523) and Florida’s Turnpike, and is on the north side of the intersection of Partin Settlement Road and Remington Boulevard, in an unincorporated area of Kissimmee, Osceola County, Florida.
The Osceola County Property Appraiser identifies the parent tract as Parcel Number 20-25-30- 4829-000100C0, 20-25-30-4829-0001-00E0, and 20-25-30-4829-0001-00D0.	The Osceola
County Tax Collector identifies the parent tract as Parcel Account Number R20-25-30-4829- 000100C0, R20-25-30-4829-0001-00E0, and R20-25-30-4829-0001-00D0, or Alternate Key
Number 1097108, 1097110, and 1097109. The valuation tract is subdivided and comprised of multiple tax parcels.

The parent tract is part of the valuation tract and is legally described as follows:

The legal description for the valuation parcel was from the Remington – Phase 2 Subdivision Plat, which is recorded in Plat Book 11, Page 28 of the Public Records of Osceola County, Florida. The legal description of the parent tract is from the client provided title work and the public record of Osceola County. The legal description for the acquisition area is set forth in the Sketch of Description prepared by Southeastern Surveying and Mapping Corporation in the Addenda of this report. The property appraised includes all those lands described above.
DESCRIPTION OF AREA AND NEIGHBORHOOD
The parent tract is located along the Partin Settlement Road corridor in Osceola County. The project starts at the intersection of Partin Settlement Road and Neptune Road in an unincorporated area of Kissimmee and extends easterly for ±2.7 miles to the intersection of Partin Settlement Road and E. Lakeshore Boulevard.

The project corridor is east of Lake Tohopekaliga, west of East Lake Tohopekaliga, and north of Fish Lake. The corridor is ±5 miles south of the Osceola/Orange County line and ±13 miles northeast of the Osceola/Polk County line. It’s Osceola County location brings it under the regional influence of the Orlando Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA).

The project corridor is predominantly residential in nature with commercial uses proximate to key intersections, and several churches and other institutional uses scattered throughout. The Osceola County Government Service Center and the Osceola County Fire Rescue & EMS Headquarters are positioned along the south side of Partin Settlement Road between Florida’s Turnpike and US 192. A rural enclave exists to the south of Partin Settlement Road and to the east of Florida’s Turnpike.

A Neighborhood Location Map and a Project Map are presented within the following pages for visual reference. A detailed Description of the Area and Neighborhood with a brief Market Analysis is presented in the Addenda.

230	DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY, PHOTOGRAPHS, AND SKETCHES
The parent tract has a size of 11.830 acres and is comprised of three tax parcel that serves as common area for a 199.850-acre residential subdivision known as Remington – Phase 2 Subdivision. A detailed description of the valuation tract, which includes the tax parcels that comprise the parent tract, is as follows:

Land Area – 199.850 acres or 8,705,466 square feet

Shape – Irregular; see parcel exhibits for exact shape.

Boundary Dimensions – The valuation tract has a southern boundary length of 1,330.81 feet along Partin Settlement Road and a western boundary length of 3,109.90 feet along Florida’s Turnpike. See parcel exhibits for exact dimensions.

Ingress/Egress – The valuation tract has ±1,331 feet of frontage along the north side of Partin Settlement Road. The existing entrance to the parent tract consists of two 27-foot-wide driveways providing ingress and egress to the subdivision and unrestricted access to Partin Settlement Road, and one landscaping island that is ±23-feet wide. The driveway/roadway is known locally as Remington Boulevard. Though the valuation tract has frontage along Florida’s Turnpike, it is a limited-access toll-road and access is not obtainable from this right of way.

Topography – The valuation tract is relatively level and generally at grade with Partin Settlement Road, and Remington Boulevard. It is partly cleared and partly scattered with trees. Most of the property is comprised of uplands; however, there is roughly ±20.01 acres of wetlands scattered throughout the site. The image below shows the approximate location of the wetlands throughout the valuation tract.

Flood Hazard Data – Flood Insurance Rate Map 12097C0090G, dated June 18, 2013, shows the flood- zone designations for the neighborhood.

Per the map, the valuation tract lies within Flood Zone X, X500, and AE. Flood Zone X is an area that is outside of the special flood hazard area and is not generally subject to flooding. Flood Zone X500 and AE are within the special flood hazard area and are subject to an annual 0.2% to 1% chance of flooding.

Drainage – The valuation tract is within the boundaries of the South Florida Water Management District. There is a current stormwater management system in place that supports the current use. When considering the property as vacant, development would require compliance with current stormwater management regulations.

Soil Characteristics – According to the USDA Online Web Soil Survey, the valuation tract is comprised of the following soils:

The soils on-site are typical of the area and are generally considered to be of a developable quality. A soil map is presented in the Addenda of this report for reference.

Utilities on-site – All public utilities are available to the property including water and sewer services. There is a water line and a force sewer main within the right of way along Partin Settlement Road.

Utilities Available – All public utilities are available to the area. The following table includes a list of utility providers and the types of utility services provided along Partin Settlement Road:

Site Improvements – Subdivision wall, chain-link fencing, asphalt paving, concrete curbing, brick pavers, stormwater retention, utilities, landscaping, irrigation, and light poles.

Easements, Encroachments, and Restrictions – There are no known easements, encroachments, or restrictions of record that have a negative impact on the development potential or marketability of the parent tract. See Section 280 of this report for additional information.

Building Improvements – The valuation tract is improved with the Remington – Phase 2 subdivision; however, the following valuation includes the land and affected site improvements (if any) and is as if no other improvements are on-site. As such, a complete inspection of the subdivision and site improvements are not necessary to produce credible assignment results.

PHOTOGRAPHS		
		
1.	Looking northeasterly at the valuation tract, the subdivision improvements, and PS828A & PS728B from the intersection of Partin Settlement Road and Remington Boulevard.		
		
2.	Looking northeasterly at the parent tract and PS728A.		
Photos Taken by:	Kathrine Tribbey	
Date Taken:	May 25, 2022	

PHOTOGRAPHS		
		
3. Looking northeasterly at the parent tract PS828B & PS728C from the intersection of Partin Settlement Road and Remington Boulevard.		
		
4. Looking easterly at PS728A from the existing sidewalk.		
Photos Taken by:	Kathrine Tribbey	
Date Taken:	May 25, 2022	

PHOTOGRAPHS		
		
5.	Looking west at PS828A & PS728B from the east side of Remington Boulevard.		
		
6. Looking easterly at PS828B & PS728C from the east side of Remington Boulevard, north
of Partin Settlement Road.		
Photos Taken by:	Kathrine Tribbey	
Date Taken:	May 25, 2022	

APPRAISER’S VALUATION TRACT SKETCH
(Plat Book 17, Page 158)

APPRAISER’S PARENT TRACT EXHIBIT
(MapWise)

HALFF ASSOCIATES, INC. – AERIAL SKETCH OF VALUATION TRACT

HALFF ASSOCIATES, INC. – AERIAL SKETCH WITH ACQUISITION AREAS AND APPRAISER’S CAMERA ANGLES SHOWN

HALFF ASSOCIATES, INC. – AERIAL SKETCH OF ACQUISITION AREA

HALFF ASSOCIATES, INC. – AFTER CONDITIONS SKETCH - CURED
235	EXISTING TRANSPORTATION FACILITY DESCRIPTION
CR 523 (Partin Settlement Road) is a major collector roadway with an annual average daily traffic (AADT) count in 2021 of 10,100 vehicles. It is identified locally as Partin Settlement Road and extends easterly from Neptune Road (CR 525) for ±2.7 miles before it terminates at East Lakeshore Boulevard.

In the project neighborhood, Partin Settlement Road consists of a predominately two-lane rural section of roadway with no median. Sidewalks, curbing, and gutters are intermittent along the corridor. Additionally, open swale drainage ditches exist along both sides of the right of way to collect and convey stormwater for the facility.

SR 91 (Florida’s Turnpike) extends in a northwest to southeast direction through the project neighborhood and ultimately provides a connection between I-75 near Wildwood to I-95 in North Miami. The segment that extends between Cross Prairie Parkway/Shady Lane and US 192/E. Irlo Bronson Memorial Highway had an AADT in 2021 of 45,200 vehicles. It provides convenient access to many cities throughout the State including the Clermont, Orlando, Kissimmee, Port St. Lucie, West Palm Beach, and Fort Lauderdale.

Simmons Road is a two-lane connector road that extends southerly from Partin Settlement Road and provides a connection to US 192/E. Irlo Bronson Memorial Parkway to the east of Florida’s Turnpike. Cross Prairie Parkway is a new right of way in the project area that provides access to a large-scale residential development to the southwest of the project neighborhood and extends northeasterly to provide a connection with US 192.

Multiple residential collector roads intersect with CR 523 providing access to residential developments along the corridor including Amber Pointe, Remington, Lago Buendia, and Legacy Park to name a few.

240	ZONING, LAND-USE PLAN, AND CONCURRENCY

Zoning Designation:	PD, Planned Development Future Land Use Designation (FLU):	LDR, Low-Density Residential Municipality:	Osceola County
Are zoning and FLU consistent:	Yes Potential for Zoning & FLU Change:	No
Proposed Zoning:	N/A
Proposed FLU:	N/A
Purpose of Zoning District:
Planned Developments are intended to promote development of the highest quality. Planned development districts, through flexible design guidelines, are intended to afford a developer the latitude to achieve a design quality superior to that possible through the utilization of standard development practices.

Planned developments are intended to result in an increased level of amenities for its residents. Planned developments are to function as integrated units, not unrelated uses or lots. The development sites are intended to provide high quality living and/or working environments by being pedestrian and bicycle friendly, being environmentally sensitive, appearing visually pleasing to the community, containing adequate recreation and functional open space, and being more compatible with the surrounding land use. Specific objectives of the planned development districts are listed in the Land Development Code.

The parent tract’s zoning was changed to Planned Development (PRD) in 2003. Ninety percent of the PRD must be developed with residential uses, with the other ten percent devoted to supporting uses. Development standards are approved based on the design of the proposed development, impacts to the surrounding properties, and amount of dedicated open space.

Remington DRI:
The parent tract is within the Remington Development of Regional Impact (DRI), which was established in 1990. This DRI includes 911 single-family homes, 1,502 multi-family units, 20,000 square feet of retail use, an 18-hole golf course, clubhouse, and other amenities.

Remington CDD:
The Remington Community Development District was established in 1994 under Ordinance 94-
2. The purpose of this district is to deliver community development services in the area, thereby providing a solution to the County’s planning, management, and financing deeds for delivery of capital infrastructure.

Future Land Use Regulations:
Low-Density Residential future-land-use designation is intended primarily for single-family residential neighborhoods, which may include detached or attached housing, with integrated neighborhood support uses such as schools, parks, and places of worship. New development is permitted at a density of three to eight units per acre. Ancillary non-residential support uses shall be allowed when integrated into a site development plan.

Legality and Conformance:
The parent tract and valuation tract appear to be in conformance regarding the requirements of the existing zoning and future-land use.

Concurrency Analysis:
Concurrency analysis reviews the necessary public facilities and services needed for development. Concurrency would not hinder development of the parent tract.
250	ASSESSED VALUE, TAXES, AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
The assessments and taxes associated with these parcels are as follows:

County:	Osceola	
Tax Year:	2021	
Parcel No.:	20-25-30-4829-0001-00C0,
20-25-30-4829-0001-00E0, and
20-25-30-4829-0001-00D0	
Tax Parcel Account No.	R20-25-30-4829-000100C0,
R20-25-30-4829-0001-00E0, and R20-25-30-4829-0001-00D0	
Alternate Key No.	1097108, 1097110, and 1097109	
Market Value:	N/A	
Assessed Value:	$7.00	
Exemptions:	$7.00	
Taxable Value:	$0.00	
Gross Taxes:	$0.00	
Net with 4% Discount:	$0.00	
Delinquent:	No	
Amount Passed Due:	$0.00	

260	HISTORY OF PROPERTY
There have been no arm's length transactions involving the parent tract within the last 5 years. The three tax parcels that makes up the parent tract transferred from Alexander M. Wells, Preston
M. Wells, Jr., Hazel S. Wells, Preston Wells, III, Clyde A. Wells, and Remington Partnership to Remington Community Development District in October of 1999 via Deed recorded in OR Book 1674, Page 1541. It should be noted that this transaction included not only the parent tract, but additional land included on the plat of record.

There is no information available to suggest the parent tract is available for sale or pending contract for sale. No occupancy or rental history has been provided for this assignment.

270	EXPOSURE TIME
The Appraisal Standards Board defines exposure time as:

The estimated length of time the property interest being appraised would have been offered on the market prior to the hypothetical consummation of a sale at market value on the effective date of the appraisal; a retrospective estimate based upon an analysis of past events assuming a competitive and open market.

Based upon conversations with brokers and local property owners in this market, and statistical data gathered from Stellar MLS and CoStar, the following value conclusions are based upon an exposure time that ranges from 12 to 24 months, when priced appropriately under the current market conditions.
280	PUBLIC AND PRIVATE RESTRICTIONS
A review of the project right-of-way maps, and the title work provided for this assignment indicate the following easements, encroachments, and/or restrictions of record for the parent tract:

The Master Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions for PUD Lakeside Estates dated March of 1991 and recorded in OR Book 1009, Page 692; as affected by Final Judgement dated March of 2018 recorded in OR Book 5313, Page 647, and re-recorded in OR Book 1663, Page 2489.
The Notice of Establishment of Remington Community Development District, dated October of 1999, is recorded in OR Book 1663, Page 2489.
There is a Water, Wastewater, and Reclaimed Water System Service Agreement by and between the Remington Community Development District and Tohopekaliga Water Authority. This agreement is dates August of 2006 and is recorded in OR Book 3258, Page 1129.
The plat for Remington – Phase 2 is recorded in Plat Book 11, Page 28. This plat dedicates Tract C for ingress/egress, utility, and drainage and Tract D & Tract E for landscaping and open space.
None of the above identified easements were found to have an adverse effect on the value of the parent tract, which is dedicated common area.

ANALYSIS OF DATA AND CONCLUSIONS

300	HIGHEST AND BEST USE ANALYSIS
The subject property was analyzed as if ready to be put to its highest and best use. Highest and Best Use is defined as:

The reasonably probable use of property that results in the highest value. The four criteria the highest and best use must meet are legal permissibility, physical possibility, financial feasibility, and maximum productivity. The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Appraisal Institute, seventh edition, 2022, pg. 103.

The parent tract is incapable of supporting independent economic development due to its irregular and restrictive shape, and its dedication as common area for the Remington – Phase 2 Subdivision. For the purpose of analysis, it is reasoned that the value of the common area would be worth no less than the entitled but undeveloped residential land it serves.

As such, the unit value of the parent tract is being derived from a valuation of the 199.850-acre subdivision it serves, as if vacant and undivided. The highest and best use of the valuation parcel and thus the parent tract is as follows:
Physically Possible
The valuation parcel contains 199.850 acres and has an irregular but functional shape that can accommodate a reasonable range of development options. It has direct frontage on a public right of way for access and exposure and has access to all public utilities including water and sewer services. It is relatively level and most of the valuation tract is comprised of average quality soils.

Though there are wetlands on-site, these areas are scattered throughout the property and there are sufficient uplands on-site to support development. While there are portions of the property within a designated flood hazard area, these areas are isolated along the northwestern boundary and there is sufficient area outside of the flood hazard area to support development. Based on this, it would be physically possible to develop the valuation tract.

Legally Permissible
From a legally permissible standpoint, the zoning and land use plan are the primary determinates of the uses that will be placed on the land in the absence of deed restrictions and any other legal limitations. This property is zoned PD, Planned Development and has an LDR, Low-Density Residential future-land use within Osceola County. The zoning and future land use are consistent and allow for residential development. The property is conforming and is capable of supporting development while adhering to all land development regulations.

There are no known easements, restrictions, encroachments, or other legal considerations that would place limitations on the development potential of the property. As such, it would be legally permissible to develop the valuation tract with a low-density residential subdivision.

Financially Feasible
Economic uses available to the property are limited by the aforementioned legal and physical constraints. The legally permissible uses available to the parent tract are consistent with the existing surrounding uses, which are residential in nature.

The City of Kissimmee and surrounding unincorporated areas of Osceola County have been experiencing population growth and notable appreciation in real estate values over the past several years. The neighborhood has good accessibility via CR 523, Florida’s Turnpike, US 192, US 17, US 441, and Neptune Road. New residential construction is prevalent in the area and the industrial, retail, and office sectors in Osceola County are all experiencing rent growth and low vacancy.

Overall, market conditions are positive, and the local market is currently in a phase of growth and expansion that is expected to continue into the foreseeable future. Current development trends suggest development of the valuation tract and thus the parent tract with a residential subdivision would be financially feasible under the current market conditions and would be in greatest demand.
Maximally Productive
All things considered, the maximally productive use of the valuation tract and the parent tract, as vacant, would be for immediate development of a residential subdivision.

302	HIGHEST AND BEST USE CONCLUSIONS
As Vacant:	Development of a residential subdivision.
As Improved:	N/A

305	APPROACHES TO VALUE USED AND EXCLUDED
The sales comparison approach will be used for the valuation of the land, as vacant. This approach is the best and most recognized method for valuing vacant land when there is enough comparable sale data available to make a direct comparison, which is the case for the valuation parcel. The unit value derived for the valuation parcel will be applied to the square foot size of the parent tract to arrive at its value.

The income approach and the cost approach are typically reserved for improved properties and are not necessary to produce credible assignment results when considering the valuation of the land, as vacant.

Once the value of the parent tract has been developed and reported, the acquisition must be valued. The temporary construction easement will be valued based on the unit value of the vacant parent tract, considering a market derived rate of return for a land lease to establish an economic rent. The rent will then be discounted to arrive at the present value of the income that would be received over the maximum term of the easement, which is 5 years.

310	LAND VALUATION
The appraiser searched the local market area for comparable land sales with similar locational and physical characteristics in comparison to the valuation tract. The sales found most relevant to this valuation, and selected for direct comparison with the property appraised, have been verified and written-up into detailed data sheets that are presented in the Addenda.

The unit of measure for this valuation is price per square foot. A grid is presented within the following pages that identifies information pertaining to the valuation tract and the comparable sales. The sales are identified by a sale number that is comprised of a county code and their official record book and page or document number. For ease of discussion, the sales are identified in the comparable sales grid as Land Sale 1, Land Sale 2, and Land Sale 3.
Discussion of Comparable Sales
The following is a summary of each comparable sale selected for direct comparison:

Land Sale 1 (92-6118-1013) involved a 205.000-acre tract of land at the southeast corner of Hickory Tree Road and Lake Gentry Road in an unincorporated area of St. Cloud, Osceola County. The property sold in December of 2021 for $18,331,000, or $2.05 per square foot. It has a consistent zoning and future-land use, which is Low-Density Residential. The property was purchased for development of a 797-lot residential subdivision that includes a mix of single- family detached homes and townhomes. Though a preliminary subdivision plan was approved, it was not fully entitled for development at the time of sale.

Land Sale 2 (92-6086-1077) involved a 95.580-acre tract of land on the north and south side of Sharp Road, east of Simmons Road in an unincorporated area of Kissimmee, Osceola County. The property sold in November of 2021 for $10,500,000, or $2.52 per square foot. It has a planned development zoning and low-density residential future-land use. This property was purchased for development of a 332-lot residential subdivision that includes a mix of detached homes and town homes and was fully entitled for development at the time of sale.

Land Sale 3 (92-5676-2779) involved a 60.340-acre tract of land on the east and west side of Cross Prairie Parkway in an unincorporated area of Kissimmee, Osceola County. The property sold in February of 2020 for $5,972,400, or $2.27 per square foot. It has a mixed-use zoning and future-land-use designation. This property was purchased by Pulte Homes for development of Phase 4A and Phase 5A of the Tohoqua Reserve residential subdivision and was fully entitled for development at the time of sale. The two phases have a total of 249 lots including 115 lots for Phase 4A and 134 lots for Phase 5A.

LAND VALUATION
SALES COMPARISON APPROACH								
FACTUAL DATA	Valuation Tract
Parcel PS728/PS828	Land Sale 1
92-6118-1013	Land Sale 2
92-6086-1077	Land Sale 3
92-5676-2779				

Location:	Partin Settlement Road,Kissimee, Osceola County	SEC of Hickory Tree Rd & Lake Gentry Rd, St. Cloud, Osceola County	
Sharp Rd, E of Simmons Rd, Kissimmee, Osceola County	E & W/Side of Cross Prairie Parkway, Kissimmee, Osceola County				
Date of Sale	-	Dec-21	Nov-21	Feb-20				
Sale Price:	-	$18,331,000	$10,500,000	$5,972,400				
Land Size (AC):	199.850	205.000	95.580	60.340				
Land Size (SF):	8,705,466	8,929,800	4,163,465	2,628,410				
Sale Price/SF:	-	$2.05	$2.52	$2.27				
Property Rights:	-	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00				
Financing:	-	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00				
Conditions of Sale:	-	$0.00	$0.06	$0.00				
Expenditures:	-	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00				
Adj. Price/SF:	-	$2.05	$2.58	$2.27				
Time Adj./Month:	-	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%				
Months Elapsed:	-	6	8	29				
Multiplier Factor:	-	1.000	1.000	1.000				
Time Adj. $/SF:	-	$2.05	$2.58	$2.27				
Comp. Elements								
Location	Urban	Similar	0%	Similar	0%	Similar	0%	

Size (AC)	
199.850	
205.000	
0%	
95.580	
-10%	
60.340	
-10%	
Access	Average	Average	0%	Average	0%	Inferior	10%	
Shape	Functional	Similar	0%	Similar	0%	Similar	0%	
Topography	Average	Similar	0%	Similar	0%	Similar	0%	
Zoning/FLU	PD / LDR	LDR / LDR	0%	PD / LDR	0%	MU / MU	0%	
Public Utilities	Water / Sewer	Water & Sewer	0%	Water & Sewer	0%	Water & Sewer	0%	
Site Utility	Average	Similar	0%	Similar	0%	Similar	0%	

Entitlements:	
Entitled	Approved Prelim Subdivision Plan	
10%	
Similar	
0%	
Similar	
0%	
Net Adjustment	-	Inferior	10%	Superior	-10%	Similar	0%	
Adjusted $/SF:	-	$2.26		$2.32		$2.27		
Discussion of Adjustments
The current professional recommendation for the order of sequence in the adjustment process is to first consider property rights conveyed, financing (cash equivalency), conditions of sale (motivation), expenditures made immediately after purchase, and market conditions. Once these five elements have been considered and adjusted for, the appraiser will next consider the locational and physical difference between the subject and the comparable sales.

Property Rights Conveyed:
The purpose of this appraisal is to value fee simple interest. All the sales involved the transfer of fee-simple interest, and no adjustments are required for this element of comparison.

Financing, Conditions of Sale, and Expenditures After Sale:
All the sales involved cash terms or terms equivalent to cash and no adjustments are necessary for financing. All the comparable sales represented arm’s-length transactions with no unusual conditions, atypical motivations, or expenditures after purchase. Sale 2 has been adjusted up by $250,000, or $0.06 per square foot, to account for credit that was issued to the seller at closing to cover a portion of the engineering fees that were associated with obtaining the entitlements for development.

Market Conditions (Time Adjustment):
There is limited market evidence to support a definitive upward or downward trend in pricing for vacant residential land in the subject neighborhood. This is due to a somewhat limited sales volume and diverse physical characteristics of the sales taking place, which both tend to skew statistical data and place constraints on the ability to pair data.

Discussions with local brokers and real estate agents indicate market conditions have improved over the past several years. The comparable sales selected for direct comparison have taken place over the last 29 months, during a period of relatively stable to slightly improving land pricing.

Though a specific adjustment for market conditions could not be extracted from the local market when considering the valuation tract, as vacant, the overall price trends and sentiment of those active in the real estate market will be considered by the appraiser in the following valuation.

Physical and Locational Adjustments:
The next sequence of adjustments addresses the locational and physical differences between the comparable sales and the subject. An analysis of a large quantity of sale information did not provide a basis for specific quantitative adjustments for some elements of comparison. Therefore, the adjustments used were necessarily based upon the appraiser’s professional judgment using past market experience and common sense. When pairing of sales was possible, the exercise was included to support a market-based adjustment.
In the comparative grid, the adjustments may be slight, significant, or substantial. An adjustment of less than 10% is slight, while an adjustment between 10% and 20% is significant. An adjustment greater than 20% is substantial. Great effort has been put forth to find sales that do not require a substantial adjustment. The individual physical and locational elements of comparison are discussed as follows:

Location:
The valuation tract is fronting on Partin Settlement Road in an unincorporated area of Osceola County. This section of the corridor is predominantly developed with a mixture of residential and municipal uses. All of the comparable sales are in similar areas of Osceola County and do not require an adjustment for this element of comparison.

Size:
The comparable sales range in size from 60.340 acres to 205.00 acres and bracket the valuation tract size of 199.850 acres.

Adjustments for size are typically based on the principle of size regression, or the inverse relationship between unit price and unit size. This is to say that smaller parcels tend to yield a higher unit price in comparison to larger parcels, all other factors being equal.

Sale 1 is a similar size as the valuation tract and does not require an adjustment for size. Sale 2 has a size of 95.580 acres and Sale 3 has a size of 60.340 acres, which are both smaller than the size of the valuation. As such, Sale 2 and Sale 3 have each been adjusted down by 10% for their smaller size.

Access:
The valuation tract has direct frontage on a public right of way for access. Sale 1 and Sale 2 have similar direct access from at least one public right of way and do not require an adjustment for this element of comparison. Sale 3 is located along Cross Prairie Parkway, which was not constructed at the time Sale 3 sold. As such, Sale 3 has been adjusted up by 10% to account for its inferior access at the time of sale.

Shape:
The valuation tract has an irregular shape but is fully functional to support development. All the comparable sales have functional shapes and do not require an adjustment for this element of comparison.

Topography:
The valuation tract has average topography that is partly cleared and relatively level. Though there are wetlands and areas within the floodplain, there is sufficient upland area outside of the floodplain to accommodate development. All the comparable sales have similar average topography and do not require an adjustment for this element of comparison.
Zoning/FLU:
The valuation tract is zoned PD, Planned Development with a future-land use of LDR, Low-Density Residential and is capable of supporting residential subdivision development.

All the sales have a similar zoning and future land use in comparison to that of the valuation tract and no adjustments are necessary for this element of comparison.

Public Utilities:
When considering the valuation tract as vacant, there are no utilities on-site. All public utilities are available to the subject property including water and sewer services. All the comparable sales are similar and require no adjustments for utilities.

Site Utility:
This element of comparison pertains to encumbrances on-site that would place constraints on full utilization of the site, or off-site benefits that would result in superior site utility. The valuation tract has average site utility with no detrimental encumbrances or off-site benefits. All the sales are similar, and no adjustments are required for this element of comparison.

Entitlements:
This last element of comparison pertains to entitlements for development. When considering the valuation tract as vacant, it is entitled residential land. Sale 2 and Sale 3 are similar entitled residential land, and no adjustments are necessary for Sale 2 or Sale
3. Though Sale 1 has a preliminary subdivision plan in place, it was not fully entitled for development at the time of sale. As such, it has been adjusted up by 10% for entitlements.

Reconciliation and Unit Value Conclusion for the Valuation Parcel
The final step in this valuation analysis was to reconcile the unit value indicators into a final opinion of value for the land. After all adjustments are applied, the sales indicate adjusted values that range from $2.26 to $2.32 per square foot. All the sales are good indicators of value for the subject property. The unit value of the valuation tract is concluded to fall slightly below the high end of the range, or at $2.30 per square foot.

Value of the Parent Tract
The unit value of the valuation parcel is $2.30 per square foot. In some instances when this type of valuation methodology is applied, one may go a step further and adjust for any limiting features that apply directly to the property being appraised. In this instance, no additional adjustments are necessary.
Though the parent tract is smaller than the valuation parcel, the downward adjustment that would typically be applied for the difference in size is offset by a downward adjustment for its irregular and nonconfining shape. Though the parent tract is not suitable for standalone development, it holds value as a common area for the residents of the Remington – Phase 2 subdivision by providing the benefit of offsite landscaping, drainage, and right of way.

As such, the parent tract is concluded to have the same unit value as the valuation tract, or $2.30 per square foot. The total value of the parent tract land is calculated as follows:

Land Class	Area	Unit		Unit Value		Total Value	
Residential Land	515,315	SF	x	$2.30	=	$1,185,225	
Total Value of Vacant Land (Rounded)					$1,185,300		

390	RECONCILIATION OF VALUE INDICATIONS AND VALUE CONCLUSION
This appraisal includes a valuation of the land and any affected improvements. The sales comparison approach was the sole indicator of value for the land, as vacant. As such, no further reconciliation is necessary. The value of the land is concluded at $1,185,300.

The cost approach has been utilized in a limited capacity to develop and report and opinion of the contributory value of the affected improvements, which is $4,500 for PS828 A/B and $49,300 for PS728 A/B/C. The combined contributory value of the affected item is $53,800. A complete description of the improvements and their contributory value can be found in Sections 470 and 490 of this report.

For the purposes of this valuation, the contributory value of the affected improvements must be added to the value of the land, as vacant to arrive at the total value of the whole, which is
$1,239,100.

395	ALLOCATION OF LAND, SITE IMPROVEMENTS, STRUCTURES, AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS

Item	Total Value (R)	
Land	$1,185,300	
Site Improvements	$	53,800	
Total Value of Parent Tract (LAI):	$1,239,100	

DESCRIPTION AND VALUATION OF PART ACQUIRED

460	DESCRIPTION OF PERMANENT EASEMENT ACQUIRED – PARCEL PS828
Parcel PS828 is a two-part perpetual easement that contains a total of 2,075 square feet, or 0.048 acres. A summary description and sketch-of-description exhibit for each of the perpetual easement are presented as follows:
Parcel PS828A:
Size:	1,928 square feet
Shape of Acquisition:	Rectangular
Location:	The south boundary of the parent tract at the intersection of Partin Settlement Road at Remington Boulevard.
Length/Width:	130.00 feet
Depth:	The depth ranges from 14.66 feet along the east boundary to 15.00 feet along the west boundary.
Improvements:	Sidewalk, pavers, asphalt pavement, grass, curbing, pavement
striping, crosswalk and street signs, light poles, and landscaping.
Purpose:	Constructing and maintaining a traffic and roadway signal

Parcel PS828B:
Size:	147 square feet
Shape of Acquisition:	Triangular
Location:	Along the south boundary of the parent tract adjacent to Partin Settlement Road, east of Remington Boulevard.
Length/Width:	20 feet along Partin Settlement Road
Depth:	It has a depth of 14.66 feet along its west boundary and its northeast boundary has a length of 24.79 feet.
Improvements:	Grass and sidewalk
Purpose:	Constructing and maintaining a traffic and roadway signal

The purpose of the permanent easements is for constructing and maintaining a traffic and roadway signal. Actual easement language has not been provided for this assignment; however, for the purpose of this analysis it is assumed this easement includes the right to ingress and egress over the surface of the easement area, and to use and occupy the surface of the easement area, in order to do the necessary clearing, excavating, construction and maintenance in, over, under, upon and through the following described land.

Per discussions with the client and the project design engineer, the existing signage, lamp posts, and right of way improvements will be allowed to remain within the limits of the permanent easement and will either remain in place and be undisturbed or will be replaced with like kind materials by the roadway contractor at the time of construction.

470	VALUATION OF PERMANENT EASEMENT ACQUIRED – PARCEL PS828
The land in the easement area is concluded to have the same unit value as that of the whole, or
$2.30 per square foot. This acquisition involves a permanent easement that is being acquired for constructing and maintaining traffic and roadway signals.

The easement will represent an encumbrance on the land that takes a portion of the subsurface and surface rights that are part of the bundle of rights associated with fee ownership of the land. The surface rights to the land will continue to be shared with the property owner and use of the easement for right of way and common area improvements will continue within the easement area. The proposed signal equipment that will be constructed by Osceola County will continue to serve the Remington – Phase 2 Subdivision; however, Osceola County will now have rights to construct and maintain the traffic signals that control the traffic at the intersection of Remington Boulevard and Partin Settlement Road.

Based on this, it is concluded that the easement rights represent 50% of the underlying fee value of the land, or $1.15 per square foot. The total value of the proposed perpetual easement is allocated as follows:

Land Class	Area	Unit		Unit Value		Total Value	
Residential Land	2,075	SF	x	$1.15	=	$2,386	
Total Value of Vacant Land (Rounded)				$2,400			

Improvements
General Contractor Matthew Reimer of Intracoastal Builders Corporation has prepared a replacement cost new estimate for the fee owned site improvements affected by the acquisition. His cost estimate is inclusive of general contractor’s overhead and profit, soft costs, engineering fees, and permit fees. A complete copy of the contractor’s estimate is in the Addenda of this report. It is summarized as follows:
Parcel PS828A

Improvement	

Quantity	

Unit	

Unit Cost	

Total Cost	Total Cost 
Inclusive of  15 % E&P	

Depreciation	
Contributory  Value	
Sidewalk	134	sf	$7.48	$1,002.32	$1,152.67	10%	$1,037.40	
Bush/Shrub - Small	14	ea	$33.80	$473.20	$544.18	0%	$544.18	
Planting - Flowers	64	ea	$2.60	$166.40	$191.36	0%	$191.36	
Irrigation	1,163	sf	$1.62	$1,884.06	$2,166.67	10%	$1,950.00	
Grass	543	sf	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00	0%	$0.00	
Asphalt Paving	378	sf	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00	0%	$0.00	
Concrete Curbing	146	lf	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00	0%	$0.00	
Directional/Parking Signs	2	ea	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00	0%	$0.00	
Stop Bar	27	lf	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00	0%	$0.00	
Pavement Striping	138	sf	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00	0%	$0.00	
Utility Improvements	1	ls	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00	0%	$0.00	
Crosswalk & Signage	1	ls	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00	0%	$0.00	
Pavers	650	sf	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00	0%	$0.00	
Light Pole	2	ea	$0.00 	$0.00	$0.00 	0%		$0.00 			
Total:			$3,525.98	$4,054.88		$3,722.94			
Total Contributory Value of Improvements Acquired PS828A (Rounded):	$3,800

Parcel PS828B

Improvement	

Quantity	

Unit	

Unit Cost	

Total Cost	Total Cost  Inclusive of 
15 % E&P	

Depreciation	
Contributory  Value	
Sidewalk	65	sf	$7.48	$486.20	$559.13	10%	$503.22	
Grass	82	sf	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00	0%	$0.00	
Irrigation	82	sf	$1.62 	$132.84	$152.77 	10%		$137.49 						
Total:	$619.04	$711.90		$640.71						
Total Contributory Value of Improvements Acquired PS828B (Rounded):		$700						

Total Contributory Value of Improvements Acquired for PS828 (Rounded):		$4,500 

No compensation is being included for site improvements that will either remain within the easement or be replaced by the roadway contractor as part of the roadway construction activities if disturbed such as the grass, asphalt pavement, pavement markings, curbing, directional signs, utility improvements, pavers, and light poles. The roadway contractor will not replace or repair the irrigation or other landscaping items if they are disturbed by construction, and they are therefore being included in the compensation.

Landscaping items are considered living items that grow and mature over time and therefore do not tend to depreciate when well maintained, which is the case for the subject’s landscaping items. As such, the shrubs and annuals are concluded to contribute a value that is equal to 100% of their replacement cost. The irrigation is not new and has been exposed to the elements. As such, it has been depreciated by 10%.

The total contributory value of the affected site improvements in both easement areas is concluded at $4,500.
480	DESCRIPTION OF TEMPORARY EASEMENT ACQUIRED – PARCEL PS728
Parcel PS728 is a three-part temporary construction easement (TCE) acquisition located along the southern boundary of the parent tract. The purpose of the TCE is for removal and relocation of existing sidewalk and harmonizing of the remainder. According to the client, the TCE will have a maximum term of ±5 years, or ±60 months.

For the purpose of reasonable analysis, the start date of the easement is assumed to coincide with the date of value of this report; however, the actual start date will be the date the easement is actually acquired by the county. A summary description and sketch-of-description exhibit for each of the temporary construction easements are presented as follows:

PS728A:
Size:	6,427 square feet

Shape of Acquisition:	Rectangular

Location:	Along the south boundary of the parent tract adjacent to Partin Settlement Road, west of Remington Boulevard.
Length/Width:	Its south boundary has a length of 535.58 feet along Partin
Settlement Road and its north boundary has a length of 535.65 feet.

Depth:	12 feet

Improvements:	Grass, sidewalk, and irrigation.

Purpose:	For removal of the sidewalk that is outside of existing right of way and for side slope extending beyond the new sidewalk that is being constructed in the right of way.

PS728B:

Size:	3,272 square feet

Shape of Acquisition:	Rectangular

Location:	Along the north boundary of Parcel PS828A at Remington Boulevard, north of Partin Settlement Road.

Length/Width:	130.00 feet

Depth:	The west boundary of the easement has a depth of 25.00 feet and the east boundary has a depth of 25.34 feet.
Improvements:	Grass, sidewalk, pavers, concrete curbing, irrigation, landscaping, entry sign, and pavement striping.

Purpose:	To construct new curb returns and side street tie-downs

PS728C:

Size:	2,562 square feet

Shape of Acquisition:	Irregular

Location:	Along the south boundary of the parent tract adjacent to Partin Settlement Road, 6.35 feet east of Remington Boulevard, Parcel PS828B.
Length/Width:	It has a length of 385.35 feet along Partin Settlement Road Depth:	The western boundary has a depth of 16.92 feet and tapers to a
point as it extends easterly along Partin Settlement Road.

Improvements:	Grass, sidewalk, and irrigation.

Purpose:		For removal of the sidewalk that is outside of the existing right of way, and for side slope extending beyond the new sidewalk being constructed in the right of way.

490	VALUATION OF TEMPORARY EASEMENT ACQUIRED – PARCEL PS728
The following chart summarizes the steps taken to arrive at the market value of Parcel PS728, a temporary construction easement. The chart is followed by a discussion of each step in the valuation process and the supporting data for the rate of return, discount rate, and the market value of the TCE (land only).

MARKET VALUE OF		
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT		
Land Area (SF) – TCE	12,261	
Unit Price	$2.30	
Total Land Value	$28,200	
Land Value Rounded	$28,200	
		
Rate of Return	8%	
Annual Rent	$2,256.00	
Monthly Rent	$188.00	
		
Discount Rate (Annual)	5.94%	
Lease Term (Months)	60	
Present Value Factor	52.05669	
		
Market Value of TCE	$9,786.66	
Rounded Market Value of TCE	$9,800	

HP12C Calculator Keystrokes
Present Value Factor: g7 (Begin Mode), N=60, gI=5.94, PMT= -1, Solve for PV = 52.05669, Value of TCE = 52.05669 ENTER, $188.00 (x) = $9,786.66

Land Value
Valuing the land within the limits of the proposed TCE is the first step in developing and reporting the value of the acquisition. The subject land was valued at $2.30 per square foot. This value also reflects the value for the land within the easement area. The fee value of the land in the easement area is as follows:

Land Class	Area	Unit		Unit Value	Total Value		
Residential Land	12,261	SF	x	$2.30	=	$28,200	
Total Value of Vacant Land (Rounded)					$28,200		

Market Rent Estimate
A temporary construction easement (TCE) is a short-term encumbrance that is in many ways, like a land lease. They both involve the temporary transfer of rights to use and occupy land for a specified length of time in return for a specified rent. As such, comparable land lease data will be used to develop and report an opinion of the appropriate return on the portion of the parent tract the County wishes to use during the time that it will be encumbered.
To develop an opinion of the economic rent for the TCE, the appropriate return on the value of the land must first be developed. When utilizing land leases to develop an opinion of value for a temporary construction easement, two methods can be utilized. The first method directly compares the annual rental rate on a per square foot basis to the property being appraised. This is a difficult method to apply since there is commonly a lack of sufficient comparable data to formulate this approach.

The second and most widely used method involves developing an opinion of value for the leased area based on a percentage of its fee value. This method has proven to be the method used by lessors and lessees involved in land leases. To establish an appropriate lease rate at which an individual owner could expect to receive on the value of his property, the following data was gathered and considered.

Current/Local Land Lease Data
Limited land lease data is available in the local market area. Most land leases that are taking place involve investment grade commercial properties that are built-out and occupied by national tenants with a AAA credit rating. The properties sought out for development by this type of end user are extremely competitive, which tends to put downward pressure on their respective rates of return.

The subject property is residential and cannot support this type of use. As such, the following market data is not to be construed as a direct indication of the rates that could be achieved for the subject property but is rather an indication of the lower end of the range of rates being achieved for land leases in the market area.

Location	Name	Sale Date	Sale Price	Cap Rate	Terms	
3230 Orange Ave, Kissimmee	7-Eleven	05/04/2021	$4,166,660	4.80%	15-year	
9224 Turkey Lake Rd, Orlando	7-Eleven	02/19/2021	$2,774,382	4.55%	10-year	
2450 Deer Creek Commerce Ln, Davenport	AutoZone	06/12/2020	$1,505,000	4.65%	20-year	
4370 Pleasant Hill Rd, Kissimmee	Taco Bell	05/20/2020	$1,407,000	4.51%	19-years	
5296 W US Hwy 192, Kissimmee	Aldi’s	11/07/2019	$3,100,000	4.30%	Unknown	
1720 Celebration Blvd, Celebration	McDonalds	03/29/2019	$2,400,000	4.00%	20-year	
8103 Lake Wilson Rd, Davenport	WaWa	09/06/2018	$3,780,000	4.60%	Unknown	
9858 International Dr, Orlando	Walgreens	05/10/2018	$2,449,339	6.30%	18.5-yrs	
1095 Cypress Pkwy, Poinciana	WaWa	04/27/2018	$3,474,000	4.75%	20-year	
5035 S Orange Blossom Trl, Kissimmee	WaWa	04/19/2018	$3,469,388	4.89%	16-year	
3264 Vineland Rd, Kissimmee	TireMart	Active	$550,000	5.5%	5-year	

As shown, the above land leases indicate rates ranging from 4.00% to 6.30%; however, they are all secured by national gas station, retail, or restaurant tenants for long term leases of 10 years or more with additional options for renewal.

A review of listings on Loopnet.com, discussions with local market participants, and data collected from representatives from the airports throughout the State revealed the following land lease data:
North side of CR 448 in the City of Tavares (Alt. Key: 3833661)
This 9.2-acre tract of land sold in February of 2019 for $1,000,000. It is currently listed for lease on LoopNet. The asking rent for a lease on the land is $12,000 per acre, or $110,400 annually. The indicated rate of return is 11.04%. It has an industrial zoning and future-land use within the City of Tavares and has additional frontage on the CSX railroad.

SR 50 at Bay Lake in Mascotte (Alt. Key: 1727952 & 1727961)
This 0.36-acre commercial lot with a corner location on SR 50 in Mascotte is currently advertised for lease at a rate of $1,200 per month, or $14,400 per year. The land is also listed for sale with an asking price of $160,000 indicating a 9.0% rate of return.

1033 Hooks Street, Clermont (Alt. Key: 2665858 & 2665840)
This 1.95-acre commercial property was purchased together with a small contractor trailer on- site in January of 2019 for $580,000. The property has since been advertised for lease as a vehicle and equipment parking lot for $3,250 per month, or $39,000 per year indicating a 6.6% rate of return on the land.

2100 N. Federal Highway, Hollywood (PID: 514210130010)
This 1.48-acre tract of land is currently listed for sale or lease on LoopNet. The asking rent for a lease on the land is $7.00 per square foot, or $450,184 annually. The asking price for fee ownership of the land is $6,300,000. The indicated rate of return is 7.15%.

It is within the FH-2, Federal Highway Medium-Highway Intensity Mixed-Use zoning district and the TOD, Transit Oriented Development future-land use district within the City of Hollywood.

5999 S. University Drive, Davie (PID: 504133120013)
This 0.95-acre tract of land is located at the high-traffic intersection of S. University Boulevard and Stirling Road and is an outparcel to the University Creek Plaza. The property was purchased as an investment in June of 2019 for $5,550,000 with a triple net (NNN) land lease to Regions Bank at a reported rate of 7.78%. It is within the B-2, Community Business zoning district and has a Commercial future-land-use designation within the Town of Davie.

2105 N. Federal Highway, Hollywood (PID: 514210210360)
This corner lot with high-traffic exposure has a size of 26,906 square feet, or 0.618 acres. It is currently listed for lease with an asking price of $7.00 per square foot, or $188,342 annually. The property is also listed for sale on the MLS (#F10055733) for $2,099,000 indicating an 8.9% rate of return. The property is next to a Pet Smart retail store and the South Broward High School with proximity to Sheridan Street. A concept plan for a multi-story residential condominium development has been advertised with the property. The site is within the FH-2, Federal Highway Medium-Highway Intensity Mixed-Use zoning district and has a TOD, Transit Oriented Development future-land-use designation within the City of Hollywood.
1101 N. State Road 7, Hollywood (PID: 514112042510)
This 11,335 square foot, or 0.26-acre parcel of commercial land is currently listed for lease with an asking rent of $5.29 per square foot (NNN), or $59,962 annually. The property is also listed for sale with an asking price of $997,000 for fee ownership of the land for an indicated rate of 6.01%. This property has a high-traffic location with exposure to over 40,000 vehicles per day and a liberal C-4, Medium-High Intensity Commercial zoning district with a TOC, Transit Oriented Corridor future-land-use designation in the City of Hollywood.

Airport Land Lease Data
On January 21, 2021, Leo Treggi as Manager of the Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport, was contacted to discuss land leases data. He indicated the land leases at the airport are negotiated based on rates ranging between 8% and 15% of market value.

This information is supported by other airport land lease data collected by the appraiser over the past 15 years, including the Ocala Municipal Airport, Jaxport, Daytona Beach International Airport, and the City of New Smyrna Beach, who have all verified land lease rates ranging between 7% and 12% of the market value.

Surveyed Land Lease Data
The 2nd Quarter 2022 investor survey results are shown in the table below. This table lists the various types of uses on leased land with the minimum and maximum national rates, expressed as capitalization rates.

As shown, the rates can vary widely for each property type with overall rates ranging from as low as 2.04% to a high of 15.93%. The average rates range from a low of 6.32% for apartment land to a high of 8.66% for special purpose properties. The subject land is currently zoned for residential uses. The average rate for apartments is 6.32%.
Selection of Cap Rate
Considering the length of the proposed TCE and the highest and best use of the underlying land, the rate of return for the subject land is concluded at 8%. The land in the subject easement area has a fee value of $28,200. Applying an 8% rate of return to the fee value of the underlying land, indicates an annual economic rent of $2,256.00, which equates to a monthly rental rate of
$188.00.

Discount Rate & Present Value Factor
To establish an appropriate discount rate for use in developing the present value of the rental stream over the period of the encumbrance, a built-up rate based on current returns on safe government instruments, and an additional 3% to account for preferred liquidity, risk, and management, has been applied.

The subject easement has a maximum period of 60 months, or 5 years. Referencing the Federal Reserve Statistical Release Bulletin, 5-year Treasury Notes were returning an average yield of 2.94% in the second half of July 2022. Adding 3% for preferred liquidity results in a discount rate of 5.94%. The factor for the present worth of the right to receive one per period for 60 months (in advance) is 52.05669.
HP12C Calculator Keystrokes
Present Value Factor: g7 (Begin Mode), N=60, gI=5.94, PMT= -1, Solve for PV= 52.05669

Land Value Conclusion
The final value of the TCE is derived by multiplying the monthly rent of $188.00 by the present value factor of 52.05669, which equates to $9,786.66, or $9,800 rounded.

Improvements
General Contractor Matthew Reimer of Intracoastal Builders Corporation has prepared a replacement cost new estimate for the fee owned site improvements affected by the acquisition. His cost estimate is inclusive of general contractor’s overhead and profit, soft costs, engineering fees, and permit fees. A complete copy of the contractor’s estimate is in the Addenda of this report. It is summarized as follows:
Parcel PS728A

Improvement	

Quantity	

Unit	

Unit Cost	

Total Cost	Total Cost 
Inclusive of  15 % E&P	

Depreciation	
Contributory Value	
Sidewalk	2,915	sf	$7.48	$21,804.20	$25,074.83	10%	$22,567.35	
Irrigation	3,512	sf	$1.62	$5,689.44	$6,542.86	10%	$5,888.57	
Grass	3,512	sf	$0.00 	$0.00	$0.00 	0%		$0.00 						
Total:	$27,493.64	$31,617.69		$28,455.92						
Total Contributory Value of Improvements Acquired PS728A (Rounded):		$28,500						

Parcel PS728B

Improvement	

Quantity	

Unit	

Unit Cost	

Total Cost	Total Cost  Inclusive of 
15 % E&P	

Depreciation	
Contributory Value	
Bush/Shrub - Medium	80	ea	$54.60	$4,368.00	$5,023.20	0%	$5,023.20	
Irrigation	1,420	sf	$1.62	$2,300.40	$2,645.46	10%	$2,380.91	
Driveway/Parking Area	1,410	sf	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00	0%	$0.00	
Curbing	100	lf	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00	0%	$0.00	
Pavement Striping & Markings	1	ls	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00	0%	$0.00	
Sidewalk	342	sf	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00	0%	$0.00	
Sign	1	ea	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00	0%	$0.00	
Grass	940	sf	$0.00 	$0.00	$0.00 	0%		$0.00 						
Total:	$6,668.40	$7,668.66		$7,404.11						
Total Contributory Value of Improvements Acquired PS728B (Rounded):		$7,500						

Parcel PS728C

Improvement	

Quantity	

Unit	

Unit Cost	

Total Cost	Total Cost 
Inclusive of  15 % E&P	

Depreciation	
Contributory Value	
Sidewalk	1,470	sf	$7.48	$10,995.60	$12,644.94	10%	$11,380.45	
Irrigation	1,092	sf	$1.62	$1,769.04	$2,034.40	10%	$1,830.96	
Grass	1,092	sf	$0.00 	$0.00	$0.00 	0%		$0.00 						
Total:	$12,764.64	$14,679.34		$13,211.41						
Total Contributory Value of Improvements Acquired PS728C (Rounded):		$13,300						

Total Contributory Value of Improvements Acquired for PS728 (Rounded):		$49,300 

As in the valuation of the permanent easement, no compensation is being included for site improvements that will either remain in place or will to be replaced by the roadway contractor if disturbed by construction activities, which is the case for the grass, pavement, curbing, striping, and signs. The portions of sidewalk that are being permanently removed from the property have been included; however, the sidewalk within Parcel 728B is to remain in place and therefore has not been included in the compensation.

Landscaping items are considered living items that grow and mature over time and therefore do not tend to depreciate when well maintained, which is the case for the subject’s landscaping items. As such, the shrubs are concluded to contribute a value that is equal to 100% of their replacement cost. The sidewalk and irrigation are not new and have been depreciated by 10%. The total contributory value of the improvements in all three taking areas is concluded at $49,300.
495	TOTAL VALUE OF LAND AND IMPROVEMENTS ACQUIRED

Item	PS828 A/B	PS728 A/B/C	Total Value (R)	
Land	$2,400	$ 9,800	$ 12,200	
Site Improvements	$4,500	$49,300	$ 53,800	
Total Value of Part Acquired:	$6,900	$59,100	$ 66,000	

VALUATION OF REMAINDER AS PART OF THE WHOLE

500	VALUE OF REMAINDER AS PART OF WHOLE PROPERTY
The remainder as part of the whole, is valued by deducting the value of the taking from the value of the whole parent tract. The remainder as part of the whole is calculated as follows:

Value of Parent Tract	$1,239,100	
Value of Acquisition	$	66,000	
Value of Remainder as Part of Whole	$1,173,100	

PREMISES OF THE APPRAISAL – THE REMAINDER

640U PURPOSE OF APPRAISAL REMAINDER UNCURED
Since the purpose of the remainder uncured is to determine the feasibility of the cure, these steps (640U – 840U) are unnecessary. The impact of the taking is minor and a minor cost to cure would be considered appropriate by market participants. No significant impact has occurred to the improved property because of the acquisition. The market would recognize the lost land and restore the affected site improvements, if any. Therefore, the uncured sections of this appraisal will not be presented and the remainder as if cured will be presented instead.

640C PURPOSE OF APPRAISAL OF REMAINDER CURED
The purpose of the appraisal of the cured remainder is to develop and report an opinion of its market value to discover if there are any severance damages caused by the taking or special benefits caused by the construction or improvement made or contemplated in accordance with Section 73.071(4). F.S.

The appraisal of the remainder is made under the assumption the acquisition has taken place, the new roadway improvements have been constructed and placed into service, and the temporary construction easement has expired (a hypothetical condition). The use of this assumption may affect assignment results but is necessary for the purpose of analysis and producing credible assignment results.
680C APPRAISAL PROBLEM FOR REMAINDER CURED
The first step in solving the appraisal problem involves analyzing the remainder property and the effects on the remainder due to the acquisition. A valuation of the remainder is then performed to determine the extent of the damages or special benefits, if any.

PRESENTATION OF DATA-THE REMAINDER

730C DESCRIPTION OF REMAINDER
The remainder property has a size of 11.830 acres, or 515,315 square feet. The remainder continues to have the same size and shape as the before condition. The temporary easement has expired. Approximately 0.40% (2,075 square feet) of the remainder along Partin Settlement Road is encumbered with a permanent easement.

Landscaping, sidewalk, a portion of the driveway, and irrigation have been acquired. A temporary cost to cure will be included to locate and cap the irrigation during construction. A permanent cost to cure will be included to reestablish the landscaping items and reconfigure the irrigation along the frontage of the remainder.

740C ZONING, LAND USE PLAN, AND CONCURRENCY
There are no known changes to the zoning, future land use, or concurrency. The property will remain conforming in the after condition.

750C PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION FACILITY DESCRIPTION
The subject project includes reconstruction of a 2.7-mile section of Partin Settlement Road (CR 523) from Neptune Road (CR 525) to Lakeshore Boulevard in Kissimmee, Osceola County. The project proposes to widen Partin Settlement Road from a two-lane road to a 4-lane divided roadway with multimodal accommodations, associated drainage improvements, stormwater ponds, and modification of signalized intersections among other cosmetic improvements. The major bridge over Florida’s Turnpike and the double box bridge over Fish Lake Canal will be modified or replaced as part of the project. A visual depiction of a typical section of the proposed roadway is as follows:

775C EFFECT OF ACQUISITION ON REMAINDER
The remainder has the same size and shape that existed in the before condition. A strip of land along the Partin Settlement Road frontage of the property will be encumbered with a permanent easement to construct and maintain a traffic and roadway signal at its intersection with Remington Boulevard. The permanent easement encumbers 50% of the bundle of rights.

A considerable portion of the sidewalk that existed within the limits of the parent tract in the before condition has been removed and replaced with sod by the roadway contractor. A new sidewalk is being constructed within the right of way for Partin Settlement Road that will tie into the existing sidewalks that extend along Remington Boulevard within the limits of the permanent easement.

All those uses that could be accommodated in the before condition can be accommodated on the remainder. Access to the subdivision from Remington Boulevard will be maintained during construction.

After analyzing the condition of the remainder property, it is concluded that there are no changes to the property or conditions created by the project that would result in severance damages.

ANALYSIS OF DATA AND CONCLUSIONS–REMAINDER

800C HIGHEST AND BEST USE OF THE REMAINDER
The highest and best use of the remainder has been analyzed considering the four criteria of highest and best use. The remainder can support all the same uses it could support in the before condition. The acquisition has not affected the development potential or marketability of the parent tract or the larger valuation tract. The highest and best use of the land continues to be for development of a residential subdivision.

802C HIGHEST AND BEST USE CONCLUSION OF THE REMAINDER
As Vacant:   Development of a residential subdivision.
As Improved:  N/A
805C APPROACHES TO VALUE USED AND EXCLUDED FOR REMAINDER
The remainder land will again be appraised by the sales comparison approach.

810C  LAND VALUATION
The same sales used to value the parent tract in the before condition have again been considered for the valuation of the remainder. No new adjustments or changes to the previously applied adjustments are necessary for the valuation of the remainder. The unencumbered remainder has a unit value of $2.30 per square foot and the encumbered remainder has a unit value of $1.15 per square foot. The total value of the remainder is as follows:

Land Class	Area	Unit		Unit Value		Total Value	
Residential Land - Unencumbered	513,240	SF	x	$2.30	=	$1,180,452	
Residential Land - Encumbered	2,075	SF	x	$1.15		$	2,386	
Total Value of Remainder Land (Rounded)					$1,182,800		

900C SUPPORT FOR DAMAGES/NO DAMAGES TO THE REMAINDER
Damages are determined by deducting the value of the remainder from the value of the remainder as part of the whole. The value of the remainder is higher than the value of the remainder as part of the whole as the temporary construction easement has expired and is no longer an encumbrance. A cure has been implemented to reestablish the affected site improvements. As demonstrated below, there are no severance damages to the cured remainder.

Value of Remainder as Part of Whole:	$1,173,100	
Value of Remainder:	$1,182,800	
Damages:	$	0	

910	COST TO CURE
A cost to cure is included when there are damages that can be mitigated by applying a cure, or when there are minor items that can be re-established on the remainder to restore the full functional integrity of the property.

In this instance, a minor cost to cure is being included to restore the landscaping and irrigation to a condition that is similar to what existed in the before condition once construction activity is complete.

The cost to cure the remainder includes a temporary cure to locate and cap the irrigation during construction and a permanent cure to reestablish the landscaping items and reconfigure the irrigation along the frontage of the remainder upon completion of construction. As previously mentioned, the light poles and all the right of way related improvements will either remain or be replaced with like kind material by the roadway contractor at no expense to the property owner. As such, these items do not require a cure.
A cost to cure estimate has been prepared by general contractor, Matthew Reimer of Intracoastal Builders Corporation. His estimate is inclusive of general contractor’s profit and overhead, soft costs, engineering and permitting fees and contingencies. A complete copy of his estimate is in the Addenda to this report.

In addition to the fees that have already been considered by the general contractor, the appraiser has added an additional 10% coordination fee to compensate the property owner for the time and effort that will need to be expended to implement the cure. A chart summarizing the gross and net cost to cure for the remainder is as follows:

COST TO CURE SUMMARY

Cost to Cure	
Minus Contributory Value of Items Paid for in Acquisition*	
Net Cost to Cure									
Item	Qty	Unit	Base
Unit Cost	Unit Cost with
30% Markup	Total Cost with
30% Markup	Qty	Unit	Value	Total	Net Cost	
Irrigation - Locate & Cap (During Construction)	1	ls	$3,500.00	$4,550.00	$4,550.00				$0.00	$4,550.00	
Construction Staking & Layout	4	hr	$266.00	$345.80	$1,383.20				$0.00	$1,383.20	
Landscaping Repair Allowance	1	ls	$2,100.00	$2,730.00	$2,730.00				$0.00	$2,730.00	
Small Bush / Shrub	14	ea	$36.40	$47.32	$662.48	14	ea	$38.87	$544.18	$118.30	
Medium Bush / Shrub	80	ea	$58.80	$76.44	$6,115.20	80	ea	$62.79	$5,023.20	$1,092.00	
Planting / Flower	64	ea	$2.80	$3.64	$232.96	64	ea	$2.99	$191.36	$41.60	
Irrigation / Locate & Modify	1	ls	$1,400.00	$1,820.00	$1,820.00				$0.00	$1,820.00	
Irrigation / Grass & Bed	7269	sf	$1.75	$2.28	$16,536.98	7269	lf	$1.68	$12,187.93	$4,349.05	
Construction Staking & Layout	8	HR	$266.00	$345.80	$2,766.40				$0.00	$2,766.40	
Total Replacement Cost:	$36,797.22		$17,946.67	$18,850.55							
Plus: Items Damaged to Implement Cure Gross Cost to Cure
Add: Owner's Coordination Fee	10% Cost to Cure (or Reestablish):
Less: Items Paid For In Acquistion

Net Cost to Cure	$0.00

$36,797.22

$3,679.72

$40,476.94

$17,946.67

$22,530.27		$0.00

$3,679.72

$22,530.27								
Net Cost to Cure, Rounded	$22,600										

To arrive at the net cost to cure for the remainder, deductions must be made to account for items that have already been paid for as part of the direct compensation for the part acquired. All deductions have been applied on a one-to-one basis, based on the unit value paid as part of the direct compensation or the acquisition after considering depreciation, if any. The net cost to cure the remainder is $22,600.

920	SPECIAL BENEFITS	
	Special benefits are specific benefits that accrue to property remaining after a taking. In this case, the new road construction has not provided any special benefits for the remainder.	
995	SUMMARY OF VALUES	

Partial Acquisition					
1	Before Property			$1,239,100	
2	Part Acquired	PS828	PS728	Total	
	Land	$ 2,400	$ 9,800	$12,200	
	Improvements	$ 4,500	$49,300	$53,800	
	Total	$ 6,900	$59,100	$66,000	
3	Remainder (as part of whole [1]-[2]			$1,173,100	
4	Remainder (appraised, Uncured)			N/A	
5	Damages (total, uncured)			N/A	
6	Special Benefits			N/A	
7	Damages [5]-[6]			N/A	
8	Remainder (Appraised as Cured)			$1,182,800	
9	Remainder (Appraised, Uncured [4])			N/A	
10	Damages, Curable [8]-[9]			N/A	
11	Damages, Incurable [3]-[8]			$0	
12	Cost to Cure (or reestablish)			$40,500	
13	Improvements Cured but Paid for in [2]			$17,900	
14	Net Cost to Cure [12]-[13]			$22,600	

Summary of Total Compensation					
		PS828	PS728	Total	
	Part Taken [2]	$ 6,900	$59,100	$66,000	
	Damage, Incurable [7]	$	0	$	0	$	0	
	Cost to Cure, Net, or Minor	$22,600	$	0	$22,600	
	Total Compensation	$29,500	$59,100	$88,600	

ADDENDA
NEIGHBORHOOD PHOTOGRAPHS

 	
Looking easterly on Partin Settlement Road
towards Remington Boulevard.
Looking west on Partin Settlement Road
towards the bridge over Florida’s Turnpike (SR 91).

 	
Looking north toward the intersection of Partin
Settlement Road and Remington Boulevard.
Looking east along Partin Settlement Road
towards its intersection with E. Lakeshore Boulevard.

Photos Taken by:	Kathrine Tribbey
Date Taken:	February 28, 2022
DESCRIPTION OF AREA AND NEIGHBORHOOD
The client for this appraisal is Osceola County. Planning for the proposed widening project includes consideration of a multitude of factors. Some of these factors include environmental analysis, land-use trends, and socio-economic factors including projected growth rates, infrastructure, and input from public meetings. The client and the property owner are each familiar with the subject property and its surroundings; therefore, matters pertinent to the appraisal of the parent tract are presented within the body of this report. General economic and demographical data for the Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA), Indian River County, and the City of Sebastian are presented in the following Area and Neighborhood Descriptions.

The Osceola County location of the subject brings it under the regional influence of the Orlando Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA). This MSA includes Orange, Seminole, Lake, and Osceola Counties (OSLO). Orlando, the center of the MSA, represents the centralized urban business district. The City of Kissimmee is the county seat of Osceola County and is the principal city of the Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford MSA.

The proposed project involves the widening of Partin Settlement Road, which is in an unincorporated area of Kissimmee in northwest Osceola County. The project extends along Partin Settlement Road for ±2.7 miles between Neptune Road and East Lakeshore Boulevard. Most of the existing corridor consists of an undivided two-lane roadway with brief sections of three lanes. The project proposes to widen Partin Settlement Road to a four-lane divided roadway with multi- modal accommodations.

Area Overview
Osceola County was first established as a transportation hub for riverboats and railroads, developing into a cattle, sugar, and lumber-based economy. When Walt Disney World Resort arrived in 1971, it changed the area’s economy drastically over a short period. The subject neighborhood is ±18 miles from Walt Disney World Resort, which currently employs 70,000 employees, making it the biggest single-site employer in the United States. It is estimated that Disney has ±55,000 visitors daily.

Other entertainment venues have also popped up over the years, capitalizing on the tourist economy brought here by Disney, and making the Kissimmee/Orlando area an international travel destination. Since Disney’s inception, some others that have followed are SeaWorld (1973), Universal Orlando Resort (1990), Legoland (2011), and countless other entertainment businesses. Osceola County is bordered to the north by Orange County, the east by Brevard and Indian River Counties, the south by Okeechobee County, and to the west by Polk County.

Neighborhood Overview
The immediate project neighborhood is bordered by Fortune Road to the north, East Lake Tohopekaliga (East Lake Toho) to the east, the City of St. Cloud to the southeast, Nolte Road to the south, and Lake Tohopekaliga (Lake Toho) to the west.
The project corridor is predominantly residential in nature with commercial uses proximate to key intersections and several churches and other institutional uses scattered throughout. The Osceola County Government Service Center and the Osceola County Fire Rescue & EMS Headquarters are positioned along the south side of Partin Settlement Road between Florida’s Turnpike and US
192. There are five churches/religious facilities scattered along the corridor. A rural enclave exists to the south of Partin Settlement Road and to the east of Florida’s Turnpike.

Transportation Infrastructure
Partin Settlement Road is a two-lane east to west corridor that is predominately a two-lane rural roadway with no median. Sidewalks, curbing, and gutters are intermittent along the corridor and swale drainage ditches exist along both sides of the right of way intermittently to collect and convey stormwater for the facility. It has an annual average daily traffic (AADT) count of 10,100 vehicles.

The project corridor has five traffic-controlled intersections, which include Neptune Road, Cross Prairie Parkway, US 192 (East Irlo Bronson Memorial Highway), Remington Boulevard, and Lakeshore Boulevard. Neptune Road has an AADT count of 23,500 vehicles, US 192 has an AADT count of 48,000 vehicles, and Lake Shore Boulevard has an AADT count of 10,700 vehicles north of Partin Settlement Road. The traffic counts are not available for Cross Prairie Parkway and Remington Boulevard.

Partin Settlement Road bridges over Florida’s Turnpike (SR 91) toward the midsection of the project, approximately 0.40 miles east of US 192. The bridge carries two 12-foot travel lanes with two-foot shoulders on each side of the travel lanes, is protected with guardrails, and has sloped embankments at the abutments. Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise intends to reconstruct this bridge as part of the Turnpike’s mainline widening program. It has an AADT count of 48,100 vehicles.

Highway accessibility in the area is good via US 192 and Florida’s Turnpike. US 192 begins at US 27 near Four Corners to the west and extends easterly through the project area, and onward across the State where it terminates at Highway A1A in Indialantic. Florida’s Turnpike extends in a northwest to southeast direction from I-75 near Wildwood to I-95 in North Miami. These highways allow for easy cross-county travel. The main roads for direct east/ west traveling are Fortune Road and Partin Settlement Road.

The Central Florida Greenway (SR 417) and the Western Beltway (SR 429) are toll roads that provide a convenient loop around the outskirts of the MSA. The Beachline Expressway (SR 528) is a toll road that connects the east and west side of the MSA, providing convenient access to the Orlando International Airport and Interstate 4.

Due to the high level of growth experienced locally, the Osceola County Board of County Commissioners has made a commitment to improving transportation options. In 2019, Osceola County enacted one of the largest investments for road improvements in County history by refinancing bonds originally used to build the Osceola Parkway.
Approximately $200 million will be used to advance design and construction of key roadways including Partin Settlement Road, Simpson Road, Boggy Creek Road, Bill Beck Boulevard, S. Poinciana Boulevard, Neptune Road, Osceola Polk Line Road, the Interstate 4 interchange at CR 532, Cyrils Drive, and the extension of Sinclair Road. The County has also received State and Federal grants to support nearly $67 million in planned transportation improvements.

Population
The chart below gives an overview of population, age, and median household income in the Orlando MSA, all of Osceola County, and the 5-mile radius surrounding the center of the project corridor.

	Population (2021)	Median Age	Median household
Income	
Orlando-Kissimmee-
Sanford MSA	±2,663,604	37.8	$61,876	
Osceola County	±388,656	35.9	$52,279	
5-mile radius of
project corridor	±129,585	37.1	$49,277	

The neighborhood’s five-mile radius is projected by ESRI to sustain population growth of 2.93% annually through 2026, for a projected population of ±149,751 residents. The household income is projected to increase to ±$54,030, with a projected median age of ±37.6 by 2026.
Employment
The following chart lists the top 10 employers in the MSA as of July 2021. Out of the top 75 employers, the two largest categories were Leisure and Hospitality (19%) and business services (7.5%). Other categories mentioned were healthcare, transportation, retail, education, aviation, restaurants, finance, and information technology.

Top Ten Employers in the Orlando-
Kissimmee-Sanford MSA	
1. Walt Disney World Resort	
2.  Advent Health	
3.  Universal Orlando (+Resort)	
4.  Orlando Health	
5. Orlando International Airport	
6.  Publix Super Markets	
7. University of Central Florida	
8.  Lockheed Martin	
9.  Siemens Energy	
10. Westgate Resorts	

According to the Bureau of Labor and Statistics, the mean hourly wage in the Orlando-Kissimmee- Sanford MSA was $23.33 (May 2020), about 14% below the nationwide average of $27.07. Compared to the nation, the Orlando area employment is more concentrated in food preparation and serving, sales, building, and ground cleaning and maintenance, which offer lower wages than some of the industries like technology and healthcare, which area lacking.

As demonstrated in the following graph, the State of Florida, the Orlando MSA, and Osceola County has historically had unemployment rates that are relatively in line with one another. Between 2010 and 2020 unemployment rates steadily declined as the economy recovered from the Recession of 2007 and 2009.

Prior to the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic, unemployment rates reached historic lows. In May of 2020, unemployment rates peaked with Osceola County’s unemployment rate of 30.6%, the Orlando MSA’s unemployment rate of 22.6%, and the State of Florida’s rate of 14.3%. The spike in unemployment rates was temporary and directly attributed to the pandemic. As of December 2021, Osceola County’s unemployment rate was 4.5%, the MSA’s was 3.8%, and the State’s was 3.2%, and all rates are relatively in line with pre-pandemic rates.

Local Population & Demographics
Data from ESRI indicates the total population for the project zip code (34744) was 58,406 individuals in 2021, which is expected to increase to 71,486 by 2026 for an average annual increase of 4.12%. This indicates the population of the subject zip code is projected to grow at a faster rate than that of the 5-mile area surrounding the project neighborhood, which is projected at 2.93% a year.

Most homes in the subject’s zip code were constructed between 1980 and 2010, indicating average home ages between 10 and 40 years. There are roughly 2,458 businesses in the subject’s zip code employing approximately 17,560 employees, which accounts for nearly 35% of the daytime population. The following two charts are generated by ERSI and illustrate population trends, key indicators, and a demographic summary of the project zip code (34744).

Education & Schools
There are two schools along the project corridor including PM Wells Charter Academy and Partin Settlement Elementary School. PM Wells Charter Academy serves Kindergarten through grade 8 and focuses on “project-based learning” in Science, Technology, Engineering, the Arts, and Mathematics (STEAM). Enrollment is on a lottery basis, and the student can live anywhere in the State of Florida. Partin Settlement Elementary is a public school that is located directly to the east of PM Wells Charter Academy and services PreK through 5th grade.

Additionally, there are two top-rated, admission-based magnet high schools just outside of the corridor that are within the project neighborhood. The first is “Professional and Technical High School” (locally known as PATHS) which prepares students in architecture, digital design, business, health science, hospitality, information technology, manufacturing, and transportation. Students graduate with a certification in their chosen path. The second is Neo City Academy, a project-based STEM magnet high school in the project neighborhood, with highly competitive admissions (40% acceptance).

Public Transportation
Though SunRail and bus-line transportation are available, public transportation within the project neighborhood is minimal. A SunRail station is near the northwest border of the project neighborhood and a free shuttle service is available that connects this SunRail station to nearby medical facilities and government buildings. SunRail currently extends from Poinciana to Debary where it terminates. Public transportation use is not widespread in the project area code and most residents travel between 15 and 60 minutes outside of the neighborhood for employment.

Orlando International Airport and Orlando Sanford International Airport are the two local commercial airports with scheduled passenger services. Orlando International Airport is the largest and busiest airport in Florida with ±50 million passengers in 2019 (Pre Covid-19).

Kissimmee Gateway Airport is also in the project neighborhood and acts as a general aviation reliever airport to Orlando International Airport, although it does not offer scheduled passenger services. It originally opened as an army air force base in 1940, although it returned to civilian use in 1945. The airport is owned and operated by Kissimmee and is the closest general aviation airport (non-commercial) to the Orlando Metro Area.

Neighborhood/Outdoor Recreation
Residents in the project neighborhood have access to free and low-cost outdoor recreation. Water recreation like kayaking and fishing are popular recreations for the locals and tourists, and waterfront residential properties are also highly desirable.

Lake Toho is the largest lake in the neighborhood, with 22,700 acres, spanning 42 miles in circumference. This lake is known nationally for its trophy bass fishing. On the north side of Lake Toho is home to Kissimmee Lakefront Park, a popular local spot for birdwatching, fishing, and picnicking.
Fish Lake is comprised of ±227 acres and is just south of the Partin Settlement Road corridor, between Neptune Road and Irlo Bronson Memorial Highway. Many residential homes back up to Fish Lake, enjoying its natural beauty. Fish Lake is connected to Lake Toho to the west via the Partin canal.

There are two large conservation areas in the project neighborhood. Tupperware Island Conservation Area is a 25-acre parcel that Osceola County purchased in 2014 through the Environmental Lands Conservation Program. The property was historically a cattle ranch and fruit farm. Twin Oaks Conservation Area is a 370-acre parcel purchased by Osceola County in 2010 through the Environmental Lands Conservation Program. Twin Oaks was historically a cattle ranch and a sod production area.

Habitat restoration aims to return the landscape of these conservation areas to their natural state through hydrological enhancements and reestablishing native vegetation to attract wildlife. Together these conservation areas offer the community several amenities, such as hiking and equestrian trails, canoeing, kayaking, picnicking, pavilion rentals, fishing, and wildlife viewing.

Remington Golf Course is a four-star golf course in the project neighborhood, which is home to prestigious tournaments throughout the year. While this is not free recreation, it is a popular form of recreation to some, and golf leagues of all levels can play here.

New & Upcoming Developments in Kissimmee
Neo City is a ±483-acre tech district, created by tech billionaire Young-hwa Song, that will bring an abundance of high paying jobs to Kissimmee. A grant of $8.1 million was awarded to this project in 2018. Song recently bought 70 acres from Osceola County for a future mixed-use town center that will combine luxury living with shops, restaurants, and a new performing art center on the lakefront.

Development of new apartment buildings is on the horizon for the area. Several land acquisitions by apartment building developers have occurred. O’Connor Capital Partners (OCP) closed an $87 million deal for the 740-acre Tupperware land holdings, in November of 2021. Waterstone Capital just recently purchased 16.5 acres northwest of the Sun Rail Station. Fore Property Company and Altman companies are also under contract for two other major parcels. Code Real Estate Partners just submitted preliminary site plans for a 320-unit community. The land purchases have occurred in areas zoned high density residential, retail, and office use.

Zoning
The future land use designations in the project area are mostly a combination of Commercial, Community Center, Low Density Residential, and Rural Enclave. The Rural Enclave is focused in the area south of Partin Settlement Road and east of the Florida Turnpike. The Commercial and Community Center land uses are located between Aeronautical Drive and the Florida Turnpike. The majority of the rest of the project area is Low Density Residential, except for a small section of High Density Residential towards the western portion of the project area and one Tourist Commercial property located at the intersection of Partin Settlement Road and Neptune Road.
Utilities
Multiple utility companies service the project neighborhood including AT&T, St. Cloud Water, Century Link, TECO Peoples Gas, TOHO Water Authority, Florida Gas Transmission, Kissimmee Utility Authority, and Orlando Utility Commission.

The entire corridor has access to public telephone, electric and cable services. A public water line is found intermittently along the project corridor with some properties serviced by an on-site well. Public sewer is less readily available than water with an intermittent force main and gravity lines only proximate to the US 192 intersection. Many of the single-family residences and some non- residential uses along the corridor are served by an on-site septic system.

MARKET ANALYSIS

Hospitality Market
The Orlando hospitality market has made a definitive come back since the Covid-19 induced dip with ADR and Rev PAR (revenue per available room) now exceeding pre-pandemic levels. Orlando's hospitality market is recovering slower than the US average due to the market's reliance on international visitors and large conferences. As demonstrated by the below market metrics published by CoStar, the Orlando hospitality market generally outperforms the local hospitality market.

Industrial Market
The Orlando Industrial Market has experienced tremendouse growth in e-commerce. The 3.4% vacancy rate is well below the National Index rate of 4.2%, which is driving up asking rents, despite over 3.8 million square feet of space being delivered to the market over the past year. The Osceola County Industrial market is significantly smaller than that of the Orlando Market but is still faring well with low vacancy and notable rent growth. Key market metrics published by CoStar for the Orlando Industrial Market and the Osceola County submarket are as follows:

Multifamily Market
Orlando’s multifamily market has had a significant rebound over the past year. Many residents have been priced out of the single-family market, leading to unprecedented rental growth. Population growth is expected to continue, but many builders are having difficulty securing land to keep up with demand. If this trend persists, lower-income households may struggle to find affordable housing in the future. Key market metrics published by CoStar for the Orlando, Osceola County, and Southwest Orlando submarkets are as follows:

Office Market
Orlando market rents have increased 2.8%, outperforming the National Index, while inventory increased. Tenant confidence seems to be rising from the Covid-19 induced dip, with more tenants willing to sign longer leases. Orlando’s vacancy rate of 8.5% is well below the national average rate of 12.3%. The Kissimmee and St. Cloud markets have lower vacancy and slightly higher rent growth due to limited existing inventory and deliveries that are considerably less than net absorption. Key market metrics published by CoStar for the Orlando, Kissimmee, St. Cloud, and Outlying Osceola County are as follows:

Retail Market
Retail demand continues to improve with the rebounded tourism industry back to pre-pandemic levels. Population growth due to migration to Central Florida and increased consumer spending is encouraging new development in this sector. The local retail market is slightly outperforming the Orlando market with lower vacancy and higher rent growth, with net absorption strongly outweighing deliveries. Key market metrics published by CoStar for the Orlando, Kissimmee, St. Cloud, and Outlying Osceola County are as follows:

CONCLUSION
The overall market outlook is positive. The local population is increasing at higher rates than that of the surrounding area, while unemployment rates are continuing to decrease, and expendable income is increasing. The County and other local municipalities are continuing to invest in infrastructure to support continued growth that is anticipated in the years ahead. New construction is prevalent in the immediate project neighborhood and throughout Osceola County and the MSA. Despite a temporary market setback associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, the local market is in an extended cycle of growth and appreciation that is expected to continue for the foreseeable future.
COMPARABLE LAND SALE LOCATION MAP AND SALE DATA SHEETS

LAND SALE DATASHEET			
SALE NUMBER 92-6118-1013			
a.	Recording Data		
	County	Osceola	
	Book & Page No.	6118-1013	
b.	Grantor	KRDK Investments, LLC	
c.	Grantee	Clayton Properties Groups, Inc., a Tennessee corporation d/b/a Highland Homes	
d.	Date of Transaction	12/27/2021	
e.	Date of Inspection	05/18/2022	
f.	Property Information		
	Site Dimensions	Irregular; see the sketch for dimensions	
	Land Size	8,929,800 SF; 205.00 AC (Osceola County PA)	
	Topography/Wetlands	Mildly rolling, partly cleared – old groves / ±5% wet	
	Floodplain Data	Zone X, X500, & AE, see remarks	
	Site Improvements	None that contributed towards purchase price	
	Building Improvements	None that contributed towards purchase price	
	Annual Average Daily Traffic	Hickory Tree Rd: 2,800 vehicles (2020)
Lake Gentry Rd: Not Available	
	Data Sources	Public record, deed, verification, site inspection, FEMA Online Flood Map, USDA Soil Map, National Wetland Inventory Map, and FDOT Traffic Online, and MapWise.	
g.	Consideration	$18,331,000	
h.	Unit Price	$2.05 per SF or $89,420 per AC	
i.	Type of Instrument	Special Warranty Deed	
j.	Parcel ID No.	04-27-31-4950-0001-0010	
	Account No. / Alt Key No.	R04-27-31-4950-0001-0010 / 1017954	
	Tax Year	2021	
	Assessed Value	$ 49,000	
	Taxes	$ 704.86	
k.	Physical Address	4800 Hickory Tree Road, St, Cloud, FL 34772	
	Location Description	The property is located at the southeast corner of Hickory Tree Road and Lake Gentry Road in an unincorporated area of St. Cloud, Osceola County,
Florida.	

LAND SALE DATA SHEET (Continued)				
	Legal Description	The legal description is lengthy. Please refer to the attached deed for the complete legal description.		
l.	Zoning	LDR, Low Density Residential, Osceola County		
	Future Land Use	LDR, Low Density Residential, Osceola County		
	Overlay District	None found		
m.	Present Use	Vacant/Old groves		
n.	Highest and Best Use	Residential Subdivision Development		
o.	Condition of Sale	Arm’s length		
p.	Financing	Cash to Seller. No impact on sale price.		
q.	Encumbrances	None found to have an impact on purchase price or the overall development potential of the property.		
r.	Type of Improvements	None		
s.	Utilities	At the time of sale, public water and sewer was not available within the Hickory Tree Road right of way; however, the broker verified that water and sewer lines are expected to be extended along Hickory Tree Road.		
t.	Sale Verification			
	By	Kristin L. Soltys, MAI		
	With	Khaled Hussein	Clayton Worley	
	Relationship	Seller, KRDK Invest.	Agent/Realtor	
	Phone	(321) 695-7772	(407) 908-6020	
	Date	05/17/2022	05/17/2022	
u.	Motivation of Parties			
	Grantor	Gain a return on the original investment		
	Grantee	Purchased for development of a residential subdivision to include a combination of single-family homes and townhomes.		
v.	Analysis / Pertinent Information			
	Cash Equivalency	Cash equivalent – No adjustment necessary		

LAND SALE DATA SHEET (Continued)			
	Sale History:	The property was purchased by Triple H Ranch, LLC in December of 2019 for $12,000,000 as recorded in OR Book 5649, Page 1739. In December of 2021, Triple H Ranch, LLC sold the property to KRDK Investments, LLC for $12,500,000 as recorded under OR Book 6118, Page 0993. This December 2021 sale for $12.5m was arm’s length; however, it does not appear to reflect current market value. There have been no other market transactions involving this property within the past 3 years.	
w.	Exposure Time	12 to 24 months	
x.	Days on Market	Unknown	
y.	Remarks: It was verified that this purchase was an arm’s length transaction that reflects a market price. The property is located at the southeast corner of Hickory Tree Road and Lake Gentry Road in an unincorporated area of St. Cloud, Osceola County. The property was previously used for a citrus operation, and it was used for cow pasture at the time of sale. The property is partly wooded, partly cleared, and partly overgrown/unmaintained groves. It has mildly, rolling topography and ranges from at grade to slightly below and above grade of Hickory Tree Road.

Any improvement on-site at the time of sale did not contribute towards the purchase price. Approximately 10.5 acres (±5%) of the site is comprised of wetlands and roughly 37.1 acres (±18%) of the site is within the floodplain. The wetlands are generally consistent with the location of the flood hazard area, which are located near the southwest corner of the site.

According to marketing material by Maury L. Carter & Associates, Inc., Phase 1 environmental report, survey, development plan, and site preparation had been completed prior to the date of sale. According to information available through Osceola County permitting, a Preliminary Subdivision Plan (PS21-00014) was approved by the Osceola County Board of County Commissioners meeting that occurred on November 15, 2021.

Construction Plans for this property were found on the South Florida Water Management District’s website that are dated April of 2022, which is after the date of sale. The plans are for the Triple H Ranch South – Phase 1 subdivision that will include 576 single-family
homes and 222 townhomes (798 total units equates to 3.89 units per acre).		

z. Property Sketch and Location Map:	
	
Source: MapWise	
(Sketch Not to Scale)	
	
Source: DeLorme Street Atlas USA	

aa. Photograph and Aerial Image:	
	
Photo Taken by: Kristin Soltys, MAI	
Date: May 18, 2022	
	
Source: MapWise	
bb. Transaction Instrument:

LAND SALE DATASHEET			
SALE NUMBER 92-6086-1077			
a.	Recording Data		
	County	Osceola	
	Book & Page No.	6086-1077	
b.	Grantor	Big Sky Land, LLC	
c.	Grantee	Richmond American Homes of Florida, LP	
d.	Date of Transaction	11/10/2021	
e.	Date of Inspection	03/26/2022	
f.	Property Information		
	Site Dimensions	Irregular; see the sketch for dimensions	
	Land Size	4,163,465 SF; 95.580 AC (2019 Plans)	
	Topography/Wetlands	Mildly rolling, partly cleared/ Minor wetlands	
	Floodplain Data	Zone X	
	Site Improvements	None that contributed towards purchase price	
	Building Improvements	None that contributed towards purchase price	
	Annual Average Daily Traffic	Sharp Rd: Not Available
Big Sky Blvd: Not Available	
	Data Sources	Public record, deed, verification, site inspection, FEMA Online Flood Map, USDA Soil Map, National Wetland Inventory Map, and FDOT Traffic Online, and MapWise.	
g.	Consideration	$10,500,000	
h.	Unit Price	$2.52 per SF or $109,856 per AC	
i.	Type of Instrument	Special Warranty Deed	
j.	Parcel ID No.	32-25-30-0000-0110-0000;	33-25-30-2605-0001-
0045;  33-25-30-0000-0090-0000;  33-25-30-0000-
0120-0000;  33-25-30-0000-0140-0000	
	Account No. / Alt Key No.	R32-25-30-0000-0110-0000; R33-25-30-2605-0001- 0045;	R33-25-30-0000-0090-0000;	R33-25-30-
0000-0120-0000;	R33-25-30-0000-0140-000	/
1143530; 1146898; 1146687; 1146690; 1146692	
	Tax Year	2021 (Combined)	
	Assessed Value	$ 268,700	
	Taxes	$4,429.34	

LAND SALE DATA SHEET (Continued)			
k.	Physical Address	2925 Big Sky Blvd, Kissimmee, FL 34744	
	Location Description	The property is located on the north and south side of Sharp Road approximately 1,315 feet east of Simmons Road in an unincorporated area of Kissimmee, Osceola County, Florida.	
	Legal Description	The legal description is lengthy. Please refer to the attached deed for the complete legal description.	
l.	Zoning	PD, Planned Development, Osceola County	
	Future Land Use	LDR, Low Density Residential, Osceola County	
	Overlay District	St. Cloud JPA	
m.	Present Use	Vacant – Older SFR	
n.	Highest and Best Use	Residential Subdivision Development	
o.	Condition of Sale	Arm’s length	
p.	Financing	Cash to Seller. No impact on sale price.	
q.	Encumbrances	None found to have an impact on purchase price or the overall development potential of the property. There is a 20-foot-wide maintenance easement depicted on PB 2/191. See the parcel sketch for an approximate location for this easement.	
r.	Type of Improvements	None	
s.	Utilities	All public utilities are available, including public water and sewer services.	
t.	Sale Verification		
	By	Kristin L. Soltys, MAI	
	With	Emily Brown	
	Relationship	Project Manager, Maury L. Carter & Associates	
	Phone	(407) 422-3144	
	Date	03/22/2022	
u.	Motivation of Parties		
	Grantor	Gain a return on the original investment	
	Grantee	Purchased	for	development	of	a	residential
subdivision	

LAND SALE DATA SHEET (Continued)			
v.	Analysis / Pertinent Information		
	Cash Equivalency	Cash equivalent – No adjustment necessary.	
	Sale History:	The property was purchased and assembled by Big Sky Land, LLC in November of 2019 for $3,200,000 as recorded in OR Book 5624, Page 239. After this sale, the property went through the process for entitlements to develop a residential subdivision. There have been no other market transactions involving this property within the past 3 years.	
w.	Exposure Time	12 to 24 months	
x.	Days on Market	Unknown	
y.	Remarks: It was verified that this purchase was an arm’s length transaction that reflects a market transaction. The sale involved five tax parcels that conveyed through one deed. The property is partly cleared of forestation and partly scattered with trees. It is outside of the flood hazard areas and has mildly rolling topography. There is one small wetland on-site that is inconsequential to the overall development. Any improvements on-site at the time of sale were not considered in the purchase price.

Construction plans for the Murrell Property PD were submitted and approved in 2019. This development was approved for 332 lots, including 244 detached homes and 88 town homes. Emily Brown verified that the buyers amended these plans but kept the same unit count as the 2019 plans, which equates to a density of 3.47 units per acre. Permitting was finalized through the due diligence period. The seller’s representative verified that the buyer’s reimbursed the seller’s $250,000 to help cover some of the engineer’s costs associated with
the entitlements.		

z. Property Sketch and Location Map:	
	
Source: MapWise	
(Sketch Not to Scale)	
	
Source: DeLorme Street Atlas USA	

aa. Photograph and Aerial Image:	
	
Photo Taken by: Kristin Soltys, MAI	
Date: March 26, 2022	
	
Source: MapWise	
bb. Master Site Plan & Site Data:

cc. Transaction Instrument:

LAND SALE DATASHEET			
SALE NUMBER 92-5676-2779			
a.	Recording Data		
	County	Osceola	
	Book & Page No.	5676/2779	
b.	Grantor	Tohoqua Development Group, LLC	
c.	Grantee	Pulte Home Company, LLC	
d.	Date of Transaction	02/18/2020	
e.	Date of Inspection	03/26/2022	
f.	Property Information		
	Site Dimensions	Irregular; see the sketch for dimensions	
	Land Size	2,628,410 SF; 60.340 AC (PRC)	
	Topography/Wetlands	Rolling/sloping, mostly cleared/ No wetlands	
	Floodplain Data	Zone X, X500, & AE, see remarks	
	Site Improvements	None	
	Building Improvements	None	
	Annual Average Daily Traffic	Cross Prairie Pkwy: Not Available	
	Data Sources	Public record, deed, verification, site inspection, FEMA Online Flood Map, USDA Soil Map, National Wetland Inventory Map, and FDOT Traffic Online, and MapWise.	
g.	Consideration	$5,972,400	
h.	Unit Price	$2.27 per SF or $98,979 per AC	
i.	Type of Instrument	Special Warranty Deed	
j.	Parcel ID No.	05-26-30-5220-0072-0150, and
05-26-30-5220-0071-0060	
	Account No. / Alt Key No.	N/A	
	Tax Year	2021	
	Assessed Value	N/A	
	Taxes	N/A	
*Subsequent to the sale, the property has been subdivided and the tax information is no longer available for the two parcels that conveyed.			
k.	Physical Address	The property is vacant and does not have a physical address.	
	Location Description	The property is located on the east and west side of the southern section of Cross Prairie Parkway, ±800
feet west of the Florida Turnpike in an unincorporated area of Kissimmee, Osceola County, Florida.	

LAND SALE DATA SHEET (Continued)			
	Legal Description	The legal description is lengthy. Please refer to the attached deed for the complete legal description.	
l.	Zoning	MU, Mixed Use, Osceola County	
	Future Land Use	MU, Mixed Use, Center, Osceola County	
	Overlay District	None	
m.	Present Use	Vacant	
n.	Highest and Best Use	Residential Subdivision Development	
o.	Condition of Sale	Arm’s length	
p.	Financing	Cash to Seller. No impact on sale price.	
q.	Encumbrances	None found to have an impact on purchase price or the overall development potential of the property.	
r.	Type of Improvements	None	
s.	Utilities	All public utilities are available, including public water and sewer services.	
t.	Sale Verification		
	By	Kristin L. Soltys, MAI	
	With	Andre Vidrine	
	Relationship	Representative of the Seller	
	Phone	(321) 303-0893	
	Date	04/20/2021	
u.	Motivation of Parties		
	Grantor	Gain a return on the original investment	
	Grantee	Purchased	for	development	of	a	residential subdivision	
v.	Analysis / Pertinent Information		
	Cash Equivalency	Cash equivalent – No adjustment necessary	
	Sale History:	There have been no other market transactions involving this property within the past 3 years.	
w.	Exposure Time	12 to 24 months	
x.	Days on Market	Unknown	

LAND SALE DATA SHEET (Continued)		
y.	Remarks: It was verified that this purchase was an arm’s length transaction that reflects a market transaction, though it was complex. The purchase involved two tax parcels that conveyed under one deed. The property has rolling topography, is comprised entirely of uplands, and is partly within the floodplain. Most of the property is within Flood Zone X, which is outside of the flood hazard area; however, a small portion of the southern portion of the property is within Flood Zone X500 and AE, which are within the flood hazard areas. The St. Cloud Canal runs in a northeast to southwest direction just south of the property.

This site represents Phase 4A and Phase 5A of the Tohoqua Reserve subdivision, totaling 249 residential lots. This indicates a development density of 4.13 units per acre.

At the time of sale, the property was already part of the Tohoqua Reserve Community Development District and construction plans were in place with retention housed on-site. As part of the development, Pulte Homes will be required to develop a portion of Cross
Prairie Parkway.	

z. Property Sketch and Location Map:	
	
Source: MapWise	
(Sketch Not to Scale)	
	
Source: DeLorme Street Atlas USA	

aa. Photograph and Aerial Image:	
	
Photo Taken by: Kristin Soltys, MAI	
Date: March 26, 2022	
	
Source: MapWise	
bb. Transaction Instrument:

HALFF ASSOCIATES, INC.–LAND PLANNING AND ENGINEERING ANALYSIS

INTRACOASTAL BUILDERS CORP. – GENERAL CONTRACTOR’S REPORT

USDA WEB SOIL SURVEY

SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION(S)

LAST INSTRUMENT OF CONVEYANCE

PROPERTY OWNER CONTACT LETTER

APPRAISER’S QUALIFICATIONS

Section VII

Section A

Section 1

  "         #        $              %#                    !  
                      ! !    
                  !                       

				 ! " 

     $   %    
   &   ' (   ) * + 
 ,   -.    
     !  "   ! "  # # ##

          ! !       "   #   $                                

           !    "        $ $      $          % %     # &                    

                    

                                            

                                          

                                                       

                                                 

Section C

Section 1
Remington
Community Development District
Summary of Invoices

August 1, 2022 to August 31, 2022

Fund	Date	Check No.'s	Amount	

General Fund	
8/10/22	
6824 - 6832	
$	50,635.20	
	8/16/22	6833	$	776.25	
	8/24/22	6834 - 6840	$	32,085.29	
	8/30/22	6841 - 6843	$	11,507.60	
			$	95,004.34	
			$	95,004.34	
AP300R	YEAR-TO-DATE ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PREPAID/COMPUTER CHECK REGISTER	RUN	9/20/22	PAGE	1
*** CHECK DATES 08/01/2022 - 08/31/2022 ***	REMINGTON CDD - GENERAL FUND
BANK A REMINGTON CDD - GF
CHECK	VEND#	.....INVOICE..... ...EXPENSED TO...		VENDOR NAME	STATUS	AMOUNT	....CHECK..... DATE			DATE	INVOICE	YRMO	DPT ACCT# SUB	SUBCLASS				AMOUNT	#
8/10/22 00290	8/03/22 5088	202207 320-53800-34800	*	685.00
RPRD BROKEN WATER LINE
BERRY CONSTRUCTION INC.	685.00 006824
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
8/10/22 00082	8/02/22 18039	202207 310-51300-31500	*	2,458.50
GENERAL COUNSEL - JUL 22
CLARK & ALBAUGH, LLP	2,458.50 006825
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
8/10/22 00321	7/31/22 1802537	202207 320-53800-34500	*	31,189.33
SECURITY SVC 7/01-7/31/22
7/31/22 1802538	202207 320-53800-34500	*	150.00
TRACK TIK 7/01-7/31/22
DSI SECURITY SERVICES	31,339.33 006826
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
8/10/22 00168	8/01/22 475	202208 310-51300-34000	*	5,886.42
MANAGEMENT FEES - AUG 22
8/01/22 475	202208 310-51300-35200	*	68.33
WEBSITE MANAGEMENT-AUG 22
8/01/22 475	202208 310-51300-34100	*	102.50
INFORMATION TECH - AUG 22
8/01/22 475	202208 310-51300-51000	*	3.28
OFFICE SUPPLIES
8/01/22 475	202208 310-51300-42000	*	13.91
POSTAGE
8/01/22 475	202208 310-51300-42500	*	28.20
COPIES
8/01/22 476	202208 320-53800-12000	*	2,357.92
FIELD MANAGEMENT - AUG 22
GOVERNMENTAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES	8,460.56 006827
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
8/10/22 00328	7/25/22 131159	202207 320-53800-46300	*	930.00
IRRIGATION REPAIR 7/18/22
7/26/22 131195	202207 320-53800-46300	*	225.30
IRRIGATION REPAIR 7/21/22
8/02/22 132261	202207 320-53800-46300	*	975.00
IRRIGATION REPAIR 7/25/22
8/03/22 132324	202207 320-53800-46300	*	405.00
IRRIGATION REPAIR 7/27/22
REW LAWN & IRRIGATION	2,535.30 006828
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
8/10/22 00291	8/01/22 7558	202208 320-53800-46400	*	650.00
POOL MAINTENANCE - AUG 22
ROBERTS POOL SERVICE AND REPAIR INC	650.00 006829
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
8/10/22 00125	7/13/22 387520	202207 320-53800-46500	*	1,057.00
INSP ADA LIFT RPLC MOTOR
REMI -REMINGTON -	MBYINGTON
AP300R	YEAR-TO-DATE ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PREPAID/COMPUTER CHECK REGISTER	RUN	9/20/22	PAGE	2
*** CHECK DATES 08/01/2022 - 08/31/2022 ***	REMINGTON CDD - GENERAL FUND
BANK A REMINGTON CDD - GF
CHECK	VEND#	.....INVOICE..... ...EXPENSED TO...	VENDOR NAME	STATUS	AMOUNT	....CHECK.....
INVOICE	YRMO	DPT ACCT# SUB	SUBCLASS	AMOUNT	#
387107	202208 320-53800-46500	*	89.95
CHEMICAL CONTROLLER AUG22
387278	202207 320-53800-46500	*	775.00
BULK BLEACH
387952	202207 320-53800-46500	*	499.00
INST 2 LIFE RINGS W/LINES
388056	202207 320-53800-46500	*	308.95
RPLCD LIGHT/GRATE/TILE
SPIES POOL LLC	2,729.90 006830
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
8/10/22 00071	8/15/22 42320615 202208 320-53800-46800	*	66.78
PEST CONTROL - AUGUST 22
TERMINIX COMMERCIAL	66.78 006831
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
8/10/22 00128	7/21/22 USA02545 202207 320-53800-53000	*	1,200.00 MECHANICAL SWEEPING JUL22
7/21/22 USA02545 202207 320-53800-53000	*	436.20
VARIABLE ENERGY CHARGE
7/21/22 USA02545 202207 320-53800-53000	*	73.63
ENVR HEALTH & SAFETY CHRG
USA SERVICES OF FLORIDA, INC	1,709.83 006832
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
8/16/22 00127	8/11/22 5284490	202207 310-51300-31100	*	776.25
ENGINEEER SERVICES JUL 22
HANSON, WALTER & ASSOCIATES, INC.	776.25 006833
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
8/24/22 00038	8/09/22 S237365	202208 320-53800-34800	*	467.18
SCANNER REPAIR 08/03/2022
8/16/22 S237501	202207 320-53800-34800	*	740.00
GATE REPAIR 07/29/2022
ACCESS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES	1,207.18 006834
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
8/24/22 00093	7/31/22 204486	202207 320-53800-47100	*	1,265.00
LAKE MAINTENANCE - JUL 22
APPLIED AQUATIC MANAGEMENT, INC.	1,265.00 006835
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
8/24/22 00213	8/05/22 53714	202208 320-53800-34500	*	422.16
SECURITY SVC 8/05-8/11/22
OSCEOLA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE	422.16 006836
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
8/24/22 00328	8/01/22 131499	202208 320-53800-46200	*	24,930.00
LANDSCAPE MAINT - AUG 22
8/05/22 132533	202208 320-53800-46300	*	405.00
IRRIGATION REPAIR 8/05/22
REW LAWN & IRRIGATION	25,335.00 006837
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
REMI -REMINGTON -	MBYINGTON
AP300R	YEAR-TO-DATE ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PREPAID/COMPUTER CHECK REGISTER	RUN	9/20/22	PAGE	3
*** CHECK DATES 08/01/2022 - 08/31/2022 ***	REMINGTON CDD - GENERAL FUND
BANK A REMINGTON CDD - GF
CHECK	VEND#	.....INVOICE..... ...EXPENSED TO...		VENDOR NAME	STATUS	AMOUNT	....CHECK..... DATE			DATE	INVOICE	YRMO	DPT ACCT# SUB	SUBCLASS				AMOUNT	#
8/24/22 00125	8/09/22 388206	202208 320-53800-46500	*	422.00
ACID/SODIUM BICARB
8/09/22 388463	202208 320-53800-46500	*	725.00
BULK BLEACH
8/18/22 388646	202208 300-15500-10000	*	89.95
CHEMICAL CONTROLLER SEP22
SPIES POOL LLC	1,236.95 006838
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
8/24/22 00292	8/12/22 2208-016 202208 320-53800-47300	*	1,369.00
SCHOOL BEACONS NOT FUNCT.
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING & MGMT LLC	1,369.00 006839
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
8/24/22 00282	8/18/22 22-3212	202207 320-53800-46700	*	1,050.00
CLEAN CLUBHOUSE - JUL 22
8/18/22 22-3212	202207 320-53800-35000	*	200.00
CLEAN GUARDHOUSE- JUL 22
WESTWOOD INTERIOR CLEANING INC.	1,250.00 006840
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
8/30/22 00038	8/26/22 S237850	202208 320-53800-34800	*	290.00
GATE REPAIR 08/22/2022
ACCESS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES	290.00 006841
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
8/30/22 00290	8/20/22 5093	202208 320-53800-47300	*	385.00
FURNISHED/INSTALLED BENCH
8/20/22 5094	202208 320-53800-47300	*	435.00
REMOVED/DISPOSED BENCHES
8/25/22 5098	202208 320-53800-35100	*	425.00
RPRD LOCK & CEILING LIGHT
BERRY CONSTRUCTION INC.	1,245.00 006842
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
8/30/22 00328	8/16/22 133343	202208 320-53800-47700	*	1,000.00
CUT DOWN/REMOVE PALM TREE
8/16/22 133344	202208 320-53800-53400	*	8,675.00
INSTALLED DRAINPIPE
8/27/22 133700	202208 320-53800-46300	*	297.60
IRRIGATION REPAIR 8/22/22
REW LAWN & IRRIGATION	9,972.60 006843
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
TOTAL FOR BANK A	95,004.34
TOTAL FOR REGISTER	95,004.34

REMI -REMINGTON -	MBYINGTON

Section 2

Remington
Community Development District

Unaudited Financial Reporting
August 31, 2022

Table of Contents

1		Balance Sheet	

2-3	
	General Fund	

4	
	Pavement Management Fund	

5	
	Capital Projects Fund	

6-7	
	Month to Month	

8	
	Assessment Receipt Schedule	
Remington
Community Development District Combined Balance Sheet
August 31, 2022

	General Fund	Capital Reserve Funds	Totals Governmental Funds			
Assets:						
Cash:
Operating Account	
$	381,414	
$	-	
$	381,414			
Pavement Management	$	-	$	398,638	$	398,638			
Capital Projects Fund	$	-	$	58,405	$	58,405			
Investments:						
State Board Administration	$	97,136	$	197,550	$	294,686			
Prepaid Expenses	$	90	$	-	$	90			
Total Assets	$	478,640	$	654,593	$	1,133,233			

Liabilities:						
Accounts Payable	$	41,518	$	-	$	41,518				
Total Liabilities	$	41,518	$	-	$	41,518				

Fund Balances:
Assigned For:
Capital Projects	$	-	

$	58,405	

$	58,405				
Pavement Management	$	-	$	596,188	$	596,188	
Nonspendable:
Deposits and Prepaid Items	
$	90	
$	-	
$	90			
Unassigned	$	437,032	$	-	$	437,032			
Total Fund Balances	$	437,122	$	654,593	$	1,091,715			
						
Total Liabilities & Fund Equity	$	478,640	$	654,593	$	1,133,233			
Remington
Community Development District
General Fund
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance
For The Period Ending August 31, 2022

Adopted	Prorated Budget	Actual		
Budget	Thru 08/31/22	Thru 08/31/22	Variance	

Revenues:					
Maintenance Assessment	$	1,468,418	$	1,468,418	$	1,475,261	$	6,843	
Miscellaneous Income	$	5,000	$	4,583	$	3,925	$	(658)	
Interest Income	$	1,000	$	917	$	623	$	(294)	
Total Revenues	$	1,474,418	$	1,473,918	$	1,479,809	$	5,891	
Expenditures:					
General & Administrative:					
Supervisors Fees	$	12,000	$	11,000	$	8,800	$	2,200	
FICA	$	918	$	842	$	673	$	168	
Engineer	$	18,500	$	16,958	$	7,628	$	9,330	
Attorney	$	27,500	$	25,208	$	18,766	$	6,443	
Annual Audit	$	3,600	$	3,600	$	3,600	$	-	
Assessment Administration	$	5,000	$	5,000	$	5,000	$	-	
Property Appraiser Fee	$	1,000	$	1,000	$	744	$	256	
Management Fees	$	70,637	$	64,751	$	64,751	$	0	
Information Technology	$	1,230	$	1,128	$	1,127	$	0	
Website Maintenance	$	820	$	752	$	752	$	0	
Telephone	$	80	$	73	$	-	$	73	
Postage	$	900	$	825	$	281	$	544	
Insurance	$	41,435	$	41,435	$	38,984	$	2,451	
Printing and Binding	$	1,500	$	1,375	$	135	$	1,240	
Newsletter	$	3,300	$	3,025	$	2,426	$	599	
Legal Advertising	$	2,300	$	2,108	$	186	$	1,922	
Office Supplies	$	250	$	229	$	26	$	204	
Dues, Licenses & Subscriptions	$	175	$	175	$	175	$	-	
Administrative Contingency	$	1,500	$	1,375	$	297	$	1,078	
Total General & Administrative	$	192,645	$	180,859	$	154,350	$	26,509	

Operation and Maintenance					
Environmental
Lake Maintenance	
$	18,200	
$	16,683	
$	13,915	
$	2,768	
Utilities
Kissimmee Utility Authority	
$	9,600	
$	8,800	
$	7,114	
$	1,686	
Toho Water Authority	$	56,000	$	51,333	$	32,177	$	19,156	
Orlando Utilities Commission	$	19,200	$	17,600	$	16,344	$	1,256	
Centurylink	$	7,300	$	6,692	$	5,914	$	778	
Bright House Network	$	5,250	$	4,813	$	4,462	$	350	
Roadways
Street Sweeping	
$	30,240	
$	27,720	
$	13,064	
$	14,656	
Drainage	$	7,000	$	7,000	$	12,100	$	(5,100)	
Signage	$	5,000	$	4,583	$	3,675	$	908	
Remington
Community Development District
General Fund
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance
For The Period Ending August 31, 2022

Adopted	Prorated Budget	Actual		
Budget	Thru 08/31/22	Thru 08/31/22	Variance	

Common Area
Landscaping	
$	290,460	
$	266,255	
$	274,230	
$	(7,975)	
Feature Lighting	$	6,000	$	5,500	$	1,770	$	3,730	
Irrigation	$	10,500	$	9,625	$	7,852	$	1,773	
Trash Receptacles & Benches	$	1,000	$	917	$	-	$	917	
Plant Replacement and Bed Enhancements	$	9,040	$	8,287	$	1,000	$	7,287	
Miscellaneous Common Area Services	$	10,700	$	9,808	$	4,560	$	5,248	
Soccer/Ball Field Maintenance	$	2,000	$	2,000	$	3,970	$	(1,970)	
Recreation Center
Pool Maintenance	
$	18,500	
$	18,500	
$	26,143	
$	(7,643)	
Pool Cleaning	$	8,400	$	7,700	$	7,100	$	600	
Pool Permits	$	550	$	550	$	525	$	25	
Recreation Center Cleaning	$	16,695	$	15,304	$	11,982	$	3,322	
Recreation Center Repairs & Maintenance	$	8,000	$	7,333	$	3,740	$	3,594	
Pest Control	$	780	$	715	$	708	$	7	
Security
Recreation Center Access	
$	4,000	
$	3,667	
$	-	
$	3,667	
Security Guard	$	330,000	$	302,500	$	327,872	$	(25,372)	
Gate Repairs	$	15,050	$	15,050	$	15,382	$	(332)	
Guard House Cleaning	$	3,300	$	3,025	$	2,250	$	775	
Guard House Repairs and Maintenance	$	3,500	$	3,208	$	3,350	$	(142)	
Gate Maintenance Agreement	$	900	$	900	$	650	$	250	
Other
Contingency	
$	10,000	
$	9,167	
$	823	
$	8,344	
Field Management Services	$	28,295	$	25,937	$	25,937	$	0	
Total O&M Expenditures	$	935,460	$	861,172	$	828,608	$	32,563	
					
Total Expenditures	$	1,128,106	$	1,042,031	$	982,959	$	59,072	

Other Financing Uses					
Transfer Out - Pavement Management	$	150,000	$	150,000	$	150,000	$	0	
Transfer Out - Capital Projects	$	196,313	$	196,313	$	200,000	$	(3,688)	
Total Other Financing Uses	$	346,313	$	346,313	$	350,000	$	(3,687)	
					
Total Expenditures & Other Financing Uses	$	1,474,418		$	1,332,959		
					
Net Change in Fund Balance	$	0		$	146,850		
					
Fund Balance - Beginning	$	-		$	290,272		
					
Fund Balance - Ending	$	0		$	437,122		
Remington
Community Development District
Pavement Management Fund
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance
For The Period Ending August 31, 2022

Adopted	Prorated Budget	Actual		
Budget	Thru 08/31/22	Thru 08/31/22	Variance	

Revenues:					
Interest Income	$	1,000	$	1,000	$	1,271	$	271	
Total Revenues	$	1,000	$	1,000	$	1,271	$	271	

Expenditures:					
Contingency	$	-	$	-	$	394	$	(394)	
Total Expenditures	$	-	$	-	$	394	$	(394)	
					
Excess Revenues/Expenditures	$	1,000		$	877		

Other Financing Sources:
Transfer In	

$	150,000	

$	150,000	

$	150,000	

$	-	
Total Other Financing Sources	$	150,000	$	150,000	$	150,000	$	-	
					
Net Change in Fund Balance	$	151,000		$	150,877		
					
Fund Balance - Beginning	$	445,343		$	445,311		
					
Fund Balance - Ending	$	596,343		$	596,188		
Remington
Community Development District
Capital Projects Fund
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance
For The Period Ending August 31, 2022

Adopted	Prorated Budget	Actual		
Budget	Thru 08/31/22	Thru 08/31/22	Variance	

Revenues:					
Interest Income	$	100	$	92	$	6	$	(85)	
Total Revenues	$	100	$	92	$	6	$	(85)	

Expenditures:					
Capital Outlay - Fitness Equipments	$	10,000	$	-	$	-	$	-	
Capital Outlay - Pressure Washing	$	10,000	$	10,000	$	19,400	$	(9,400)	
Capital Outlay - Landscape Improvements	$	15,000	$	15,000	$	7,750	$	7,250	
Capital Outlay - Sidewalk/Roadway Improvements	$	95,000	$	95,000	$	150,085	$	(55,085)	
Capital Outlay - Rec Center Improvements	$	11,000	$	-	$	-	$	-	
Capital Outlay - Street Tree Trimming	$	25,000	$	25,000	$	24,985	$	15	
Contingency	$	-	$	-	$	395	$	(395)	
Total Expenditures	$	166,000	$	145,000	$	202,615	$	(57,615)	
					
Excess Revenues/Expenditures	$	(165,900)		$	(202,609)		

Other Financing Sources:
Transfer In	

$	196,313	

$	196,313	

$	200,000	

$	3,688	
Total Other Financing Sources	$	196,313	$	196,313	$	200,000	$	3,688	
					
Net Change in Fund Balance	$	30,413		$	(2,609)		
					
Fund Balance - Beginning	$	59,645		$	61,014		
					
Fund Balance - Ending	$	90,058		$	58,405		
Remington
Community Development District Month to Month

	Oct	Nov	Dec	Jan	Feb	March	April	May	June	July	Aug	Sept	Total	

Revenues:													
Maintenance Assessment	$	-	$	164,313	$  1,154,249	$	24,755	$	26,685	$	40,784	$	27,898	$	17,088	$	19,488	$	-	$	-	$	-  $ 1,475,261	
Miscellaneous Income	$	230	$	340	$	360	$	80	$	170	$	610	$	435	$	610	$	180	$	460	$	450	$	-  $	3,925	
Interest Income	$	14	$	12	$	11	$	12	$	11	$	24	$	36	$	70	$	99	$	148	$	186	$	-  $	623	
Total Revenues	$	244	$  164,665	$ 1,154,620	$	24,847	$	26,867	$	41,418	$	28,369	$	17,767	$	19,767	$	608	$	636	$	-  $ 1,479,809	

Expenditures:													
General & Administrative:													

Supervisors Fees	$	1,000	
$	1,800	
$	600	
$	800	
$	-	
$	-	
$	1,600	
$	1,000	
$	-	
$	1,000	
$	1,000	
$	-  $	8,800		
FICA	$	77	$	138	$	46	$	61	$	-	$	-	$	122	$	77	$	-	$	77	$	77	$	-  $	673		
Engineer	$	225	$	150	$	-	$	548	$	150	$	432	$	330	$	685	$	4,333	$	776	$	-	$	-  $	7,628		
Attorney	$	2,047	$	143	$	969	$	1,563	$	741	$	1,368	$	1,842	$	1,169	$	2,138	$	2,459	$	4,330	$	-  $	18,766		
Annual Audit	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	3,600	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-  $	3,600		
Assessment Administration	$	5,000	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-  $	5,000		
Property Appraiser Fee	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	744	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-  $	744		
Management Fees	$	5,886	$	5,886	$	5,886	$	5,886	$	5,886	$	5,886	$	5,886	$	5,886	$	5,886	$	5,886	$	5,886	$	-  $	64,751		
Information Technology	$	102	$	102	$	102	$	102	$	102	$	102	$	102	$	102	$	102	$	102	$	102	$	-  $	1,127		
Website Maintenance	$	68	$	68	$	68	$	68	$	68	$	68	$	68	$	68	$	68	$	68	$	68	$	-  $	752		
Telephone	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-  $	-		
Postage	$	18	$	47	$	12	$	13	$	23	$	25	$	19	$	28	$	58	$	25	$	14	$	-  $	281		
Insurance	$	38,984	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-  $	38,984		
Printing and Binding	$	3	$	29	$	13	$	16	$	33	$	1	$	4	$	5	$	2	$	0	$	28	$	-  $	135		
Newsletter	$	-	$	903	$	-	$	428	$	-	$	-	$	238	$	428	$	-	$	428	$	-	$	-  $	2,426		
Legal Advertising	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	49	$	138	$	-	$	-	$	-  $	186		
Office Supplies	$	4	$	4	$	3	$	3	$	1	$	1	$	1	$	1	$	2	$	1	$	3	$	-  $	26		
Dues, Licenses & Subscriptions	$	175	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-  $	175		
Administrative Contingency	$	80	$	65	$	92	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	16	$	15	$	30	$	-  $	297		
Total General & Administrative	$	53,669	$	9,335	$	7,793	$	9,489	$	10,606	$	8,627	$	10,214	$	9,498	$	12,742	$	10,839	$	11,538	$	-  $  154,350		

Operation and Maintenance

Environmental
Lake Maintenance	$	1,265
Utilities
Kissimmee Utility Authority	$	552	

$	1,265

$	625	

$	1,265

$	660	

$	1,265

$	647	

$	1,265

$	661	

$	1,265

$	618	

$	1,265

$	695	

$	1,265

$	614	

$	1,265

$	604	

$	1,265

$	684	

$	1,265

$	754	

$	-  $	13,915

$	-  $	7,114		
Toho Water Authority	$	3,955	$	2,818	$	3,897	$	3,136	$	3,826	$	3,712	$	3,027	$	2,762	$	2,241	$	2,804	$	-	$	-  $	32,177		
Orlando Utilities Commission	$	1,422	$	1,358	$	1,411	$	1,525	$	1,484	$	1,467	$	1,343	$	1,363	$	1,561	$	1,577	$	1,833	$	-  $	16,344		
Centurylink	$	564	$	563	$	563	$	262	$	562	$	869	$	565	$	263	$	866	$	571	$	268	$	-  $	5,914		
Bright House Network	$	403
Roadways
Street Sweeping	$	1,342	$	403

$	1,342	$	403

$	1,376	$	403

$	1,392	$	403

$	-	$	408

$	1,391	$	408

$	2,864	$	408

$	-	$	408

$	1,648	$	408

$	1,710	$	408

$	-	$	-  $	4,462

$	-  $	13,064		
Drainage	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	3,425	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	8,675	$	-  $	12,100		
Signage	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	285	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	3,390	$	-  $	3,675		
Remington
Community Development District Month to Month

	Oct	Nov	Dec	Jan	Feb	March	April	May	June	July	Aug	Sept	Total	

Common Area
Landscaping	

$	24,930	

$	24,930	

$	24,930	

$	24,930	

$	24,930	

$	24,930	

$	24,930	

$	24,930	

$	24,930	

$	24,930	

$	24,930	

$	-  $	

274,230	
Feature Lighting	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	1,285	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	485	$	-  $	1,770	
Irrigation	$	-	$	-	$	1,854	$	698	$	626	$	-	$	453	$	302	$	200	$	2,535	$	1,184	$	-  $	7,852	
Trash Receptacles & Benches	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-  $	-	
Plant Replacement and Bed Enhancements	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	1,000	$	-  $	1,000	
Miscellaneous Common Area Services	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	1,930	$	-	$	820	$	990	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	820	$	-  $	4,560	
Soccer/Ball Field Maintenance	$	165	$	185	$	-	$	165	$	-	$	170	$	-	$	135	$	-	$	485	$	2,665	$	-  $	3,970	
Recreation Center
Pool Maintenance	
$	1,301	
$	468	
$	845	
$	1,020	
$	1,248	
$	220	
$	355	
$	6,939	
$	8,425	
$	3,863	
$	1,460	
$	-  $	
26,143	
Pool Cleaning	$	600	$	650	$	650	$	650	$	650	$	650	$	650	$	650	$	650	$	650	$	650	$	-  $	7,100	
Pool Permits	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	525	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-  $	525	
Recreation Center Cleaning	$	1,050	$	1,100	$	1,611	$	1,050	$	950	$	1,292	$	1,050	$	1,250	$	1,579	$	1,050	$	-	$	-  $	11,982	
Recreation Center Repairs & Maintenance	$	1,180	$	-	$	385	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	925	$	485	$	765	$	-	$	-	$	-  $	3,740	
Pest Control
Security	$	63	$	63	$	63	$	63	$	63	$	63	$	63	$	67	$	67	$	67	$	67	$	-  $	708	
Recreation Center Access	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-  $	-		
Security Guard	$	29,021	$	28,024	$	29,064	$	29,121	$	26,134	$	28,729	$	29,057	$	33,112	$	31,700	$	31,973	$	31,937	$	-  $	327,872		
Gate Repairs	$	767	$	894	$	1,078	$	823	$	629	$	2,813	$	736	$	962	$	755	$	4,375	$	1,551	$	-  $	15,382		
Guard House Cleaning	$	200	$	200	$	250	$	250	$	250	$	200	$	200	$	250	$	250	$	200	$	-	$	-  $	2,250		
Guard House Repairs and Maintenance	$	-	$	265	$	325	$	2,335	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	425	$	-  $	3,350		
Gate Maintenance Agreement	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	650	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-  $	650		
Other														
Contingency	$	-	$	152	$	-	$	103	$	-	$	111	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	333	$	123	$	-  $	823		
Field Management Services	$	2,358	$	2,358	$	2,358	$	2,358	$	2,358	$	2,358	$	2,358	$	2,358	$	2,358	$	2,358	$	2,358	$	-  $	25,937		
Total O&M Expenditures	$	71,137	$	67,662	$	72,988	$	75,060	$	66,038	$	72,085	$	76,644	$	78,639	$	80,270	$	81,837	$	86,248	$	-  $  828,608		
														
Total Expenditures	$  124,806	$	76,997	$	80,780	$	84,549	$	76,644	$	80,713	$	86,857	$	88,137	$	93,012	$	92,676	$	97,786	$	-  $  982,959		

Other Financing Uses														
Transfer Out - Pavement Management	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	150,000	$	-	$	-  $	150,000		
Transfer Out - Capital Projects	$	-	$	-	$	100,000	$	100,000	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-  $	200,000		
Total Other Financing Uses	$	-	$	-	$  100,000	$  100,000	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$  150,000	$	-	$	-  $  350,000		
														
Total Expenditures & Other Financing Uses	$	124,806	$	76,997	$	180,780	$	184,549	$	76,644	$	80,713	$	86,857	$	88,137	$	93,012	$	242,676	$	97,786	$	-  $ 1,332,959		
														
Net Change in Fund Balance	$	(124,562)	$	87,668	$	973,840	$	(159,702)	$	(49,777)	$	(39,295)	$	(58,488)	$	(70,370)	$	(73,245)	$	(242,068)	$	(97,150)	$	-  $	146,850		
Remington
Community Development District Assessment Receipt Schedule Fiscal Year 2022

Net Assessments	$ Gross Assessments	$

1,468,412	$
1,562,140	$

1,468,412
1,562,140

Section 3
Osceola County Sheriff's Office

Job Site: Remington Community Development

Detail Activity Sheet

DATE	TIME	LOCATION	ACTIVITY	INCIDENT #	
07/27/22	1800	Remington Community Development	10-8		
	1810	Remington Blvd/Willow Glen	Patrol		
	1830	Remington Blvd	Patrol		
	1900	Knights bridge /South bridge	patrol		
	1930	Remington Blvd	Patrol		
	2000	Remington Blvd	Patrol		
	2030	Knights bridge /South bridge	Patrol		
	2100	Remington Blvd	Patrol		
	2130	Remington Blvd/Southbridge	Patrol		
	2200	Remington Blvd	Patrol		
			10-7		

					

					

					

Calls for Service	Arrests	Traffic Stops	Parking Violations	Routine Checks						
Calls Taken		Misdemeanor		Citations		Citations		Parks	10	
Back-up		Felony		Written Warning		Written Warning		Schools/Library		
Self Initiated		Traffic		Verbal Warning		Verbal Warning		Businesses	10	
Reports		Ordinance						Construction		

Name: 	Raymond West	
ID #: 	898	
Date: 	07/27/22