MINUTES OF MEETING REMINGTON
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

The regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the Remington Community Development District was held on Tuesday, January 31, 2023 at 6:00 p.m. at the Remington Recreation Center, 2651 Remington Boulevard, Kissimmee, Florida.

Present and constituting a quorum:

Kenneth Soukup Pam Zaresk
Brian (Ken) Brown Tim Mehrlich by phone David Jaisingh

Also present:

Jason Showe Scott Clark Pete Glasscock Alan Scheerer
William McLeod

FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS

Chairman Vice Chair
Assistant Secretary Assistant Secretary Assistant Secretary

District Manager District Counsel HWA
Field Manager
DSI Security Services

Roll Call

Mr. Soukup called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. and Mr. Showe called the roll. All Supervisors were present.

SECOND ORDER OF BUSINESS
Mr. Showe: No modifications.

TIDRD ORDER OF BUSINESS

Modifications to Agenda

Security	Report	from	DSI	Security Services

Mr. Soukup: That brings us to the Security Report.
Mr. McLeod: For the past 30-plus days, we've had 9,823 residents go through the Partin Settlement Road gate and 1,767 visitors. At the E. Lakeshore Boulevard gate, we had 5,411 residents and 1,009 visitors. We issued 139 citations, had two towed vehicles and one attempted

tow where the tow truck company couldn't get out here. We noticed an uptake in aggressive behavior towards the guards. I just wanted to share with you some of the things that were happening. We had one incident at the gate where a gentleman got out of the car and approached. The vehicle was holding up both sides of the entrance lanes. The female passenger of the truck convinced the person to get back in the truck and drive through because he was upset. He rolled down his window to let the guard verify who he was to enter through the resident gate at Partin Settlement Road. The officer was professional. There was no issue there, but we're seeing a lot of aggression about cars being ticketed. It's mostly because people do not understand that there are no rules during the daytime. Its only at night. We're seeing a lot of aggressive behavior. I had one gentleman who called me and just literally screamed at me over the phone because he had a car in front of his house, before our officer was even there. I've just noticed a lot of people not understanding what the rules are here. I was wondering if the Board would be okay with me developing a flyer that we could leave here for people to get or for our officer to hand out that has the rules for parking on it and maybe some numbers that they call if they want to complain.
Ms. Zaresk: Yeah.
Mr. Soukup: Yeah.
Mr. Showe: They know our number.
Mr. Brown: You could also put it in the newsletter.
Mr. Jaisingh: The problem is we have a lot of renters here or Airbnbs. They don't care about the rules.
Mr. Brown: We used to have one of those highway signs. We could put it up on Remington Boulevard for a week or so.
Mr. Soukup: Can we do that?
Mr. Mehrlich: We can send an email to the HOA. Mr. Soukup: Yeah.
Mr. Scheerer: I thought we did when we reopened the security gates the first time. Mr. Brown: Maybe.
Mr. Soukup: We used to put flyers on cars too as a courtesy, if they were blocking the sidewalk or parking on the street as just courtesy.
Mr. Soukup: That's a Code Enforcement issue. Mr. Soukup: Yeah.

Ms. Zaresk: Does the Master HOA away have any restriction on Airbnb?
Mr. Soukup: Yes, they do. Only the ones that are towards the Partin Settlement Road gate are allowed that.
Mr. Scheerer: The Phase 2 section out there.
Mr. Soukup: They are still doing it. I've had code enforcement out from my neighbor going back to 2011 and nothing ever really got done with it. Short-term rentals.
Mr. McLeod: I'll develop a flyer and I'll make sure Jason sees it before I start printing.
Ms. Zaresk: I think that's a good idea actually and I think it's a good idea to put it in the newsletter.
Mr. Showe: We can send it to the HOA.
Mr. Soukup: Are there any questions on the Security Report?
Ms. Zaresk: One question. Are they still being told that they're supposed to use their lights during the day?
Mr. McLeod: Yes ma'am. Ms. Zaresk: They aren't. Mr. McLeod: Okay.
Ms. Zaresk: Well, I shouldn't say they aren't. I don't mean it like that. I have a little more awareness now.
Mr. McLeod: Is it on a weekend or during the week? Ms. Zaresk: During the week.
Mr. McLeod: Okay. The Site Supervisor had gone away and then came back and I'm not sure ifl have made him aware of that policy. I'll make sure he is aware.
Ms. Zaresk: Yeah. It's no huge deal, but now that you're going through Club Villas, I see them and I was like, "Come on, turn on your lights. "
Mr. McLeod: I'll make sure that we do it.
Ms. Zaresk: But we are glad to have them going through there. Mr. McLeod: Good.
Ms. Zaresk: That's helpful.
Mr. Scheerer: The street sweeper went through there the other day. Ms. Zaresk: I'm going to talk about that.

FOURTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Public Comment Period
Mr. Soukup: That brings us to the public comment period. No residents are here. So, we'll go ahead and close the public comment period.

FIFTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Approval of Minutes of the November 29,
2022, Audit Committee and Board of Supervisors Meetings
Mr. Soukup: That brings us to approval of the minutes from the November 291h Audit Committee Meeting.
Mr. Showe: And the regular meeting minutes.

On MOTION by Ms. Zaresk seconded by Mr. Brown with all in favor the Minutes of the November 29, 2022 Audit Committee and Board of Supervisors Meetings were approved as presented.

SIXTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Ratification of Audit Services Agreement
- DiBartolomeo, McBee, Hartley & Barnes Mr. Showe: If the Board recalls, in November and December, we had an Audit Committee meeting. This is the agreement and in accordance with the Audit Committee results. We've already signed it on our end to get them started on the audit. So, I request that the Board ratify approval of
that agreement.

On MOTION by Mr. Brown seconded by Ms. Zaresk with all in favor the Audit Services Agreement with DiBartolomeo, McBee, Hartley & Barnes was ratified.

SEVENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Ratification of Data Sharing Agreement
with Osceola County Property Appraiser
Mr. Showe: The second agreement that we would like to have ratified is our annual agreement with the Osceola County Property Appraiser. This is our agreement, although it affects the District Manager more. This is a Confidentiality Agreement so that we don't release items that are confidential in the property records. We've actually don't even receive those. When we get the rolls, they are marked as confidential anyway, but they require a signed agreement. So, we have gone ahead and executed that.

Mr. Soukup: We need a motion for ratification of the Data-Sharing Agreement with the Osceola County Property Appraiser.

On MOTION by Ms. Zaresk seconded by Mr. Brown with all in favor the Data Sharing Agreement with Osceola County Property Appraiser was ratified.

EIGHTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Staff Reports
Attorney
Review of Florida Department of Transportation Purchase Agreement
Mr. Clark: At the last meeting, the Board authorized the $50,000 settlement on the Turnpike taking over the wetland area. They've sent the agreement that is in the agenda and I'm asking that the Board approve it in substantial form. There are moving parts in there that I am discussing with them. One is that I asked them to demonstrate before we close, that they've gotten approval from the Water Management District to change the use of that property since it is subject to a permit and conservation area.
Mr. Soukup: Right.
Mr. Clark: They're trying really hard to understand what I mean by that.
Mr. Soukup: They don't know what the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) is?
Mr. Clark: They are the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). They go where they want and screw the SFWMD.
Mr. Soukup: Wow.
Mr. Clark: You can put that in the minutes. So, I'm working with them on that and also ask that they clarify the closing date term that says, "After agency approval. "I'd like something a little bit more concrete than that. So, they're talking and trying to give me a date which is an outside date for that. But assuming that they can fix those things with me, I'd like to go ahead and proceed. You'll note as well that the agreement contains an attorney fee provision for $4,950. That's based on a statutory formula. So, we'll get the $50,000 and what they pay will cover the time that I've expanded in this. So, I'll ask for a conceptual approval that's subject to the final changes.

On MOTION by Mr. Jaisingh seconded by Mr. Brown with all in favor the Florida Department of Transportation Purchase Agreement was approved in substantial form.

Mr. Clark: Before the next item, I'll update you on the Partin Settlement Road taking. You'll recall that we went back to them with $130,000 and they came back with $95,000. I said to the Board at the last meeting, that I felt we needed to more carefully evaluate the cost to fix irrigation or anything like that. I asked staff to take a look at that and I don't know if you have an update.
Mr. Scheerer: Where we are right now is Pete met me onsite and we went over the plans. I think we have a few more questions on what we can actually determine based on the drawings. So, the engineer is reaching out to Osceola County to set up an onsite visit. So, we can take a look at everything in real time because there are brick pavers out there, not just asphalt. It looks like a portion of our median where our Remington sign is, could be affected by that.
Mr. Glasscock: As near as I can tell, around that bullnose where the sign is, without seeing the full plans, it looks like they're going to replace that curb. Until we replace that curb, we won't know what the damage is. There is minimal damage on the brick pavers. The District spent a lot of money on those brick pavers. As Alan could attest, those are the best brick pavers that I have ever seen. The contractor did a great job. I don't know if you remember, but basically, they built a bathtub. It's as solid as a bathtub. So, there might be water in there now, but there's nothing much more in the way. So, if they get in there and start changing the curbing, they are going to damage it. It kind of appears that they're going to bring the asphalt further up into that. So, if they do that, there's that cost associated with the loss of what we put in. We need to make sure that they are going to put it back exactly. Even though it would be shortened, they are going to put it back exactly the way it is because it's worked out fantastic for us.
Mr. Soukup: Will they get as far as the storm drain?
Mr. Glasscock: No. The way it is now, it looks like it's going to come just shy of the wall.
Mr. Clark: So, we'll continue to work on that and just clarify what they're paying us, what they're going to fix and what things have to fix. It will come back when we're ready to try to come up with a number of them. I will tell you also that they previously filed their eminent domain action. Last Wednesday, they had an Order of Taking, which gives them authority to go ahead and work on the property. In order to do that, they have to put money up in the registry of court, which

they've done based on their appraised value. The law permits them to take the property and go ahead and work while we argue about numbers. So, if you see work beginning to commence there and you haven't received your money yet, that's the normal part of the process. But there is a deposit.
Ms. Zaresk: Do they have to pay a deposit to fix our pavers if they start screwing it up?
Mr. Clark: I don't know, but the numbers are still in flux and I think we'll ultimately make it go higher just based on more of our analysis of it. I convinced them that we are involved than what their appraisers said. An appraiser comes out, takes some pictures and puts a number on it. So, I'll continue to report on that and let you know what's going on.

Review of Temporary Agreement for HOA Food Truck Event
Mr. Clark: The other thing that I have on the agenda is the Board discussed a proposal for a food truck night at the last meeting. I prepared a skeleton of an agreement without the details. I called for an exhibit with the details because we might use it more than once for different type of events or they may come up with a fixed schedule. That is something that the Board at the last meeting was not completely sure whether to do a one-time thing and just see what it looked like or have a schedule. The agreement can go either way just by adding the details on the back of it. So, I wanted to open that for discussion or approval. If you're satisfied with the form of that, then we can send it to the HOA.
Mr. Soukup: Are there any questions on the Food Truck Agreement? It's fine. I don't have any questions.
Mr. Jaisingh: The last time we were here, we talked about whether or not we should make this a temporary thing. Does anybody remember?
Mr. Brown: Yes. There are two different things that you can do with the county, but you must have a permit to be able to do food truck events. You can do a temporary event, which is actually 45 days, extendable to 90 days or you can just modify your STP and show that you have the parking and the restrooms available and all of that. If you do that process then you can do them whenever you want. I personally don't think it would be a bad idea to do a revision to the STP. Then, whether this works out or doesn't work out, if we wanted to do an event here for some holiday or for any other thing, then we could and we don't have to worry about it.

truck.

Ms. Zaresk: So, what you're saying is it would be a blanket agreement, not just for the food

Mr. Brown: Yes.
Mr. Jaisingh: Would we have to modify this?
Mr. Brown: Well, the only thing is just to show that you have the parking. You wouldn't

have any engineering.
Mr. Jaisingh: I would think that because it would be held on our own property, that we can control it because we are a quasi-government agency.
Mr. Clark: It seems like we have a property that's recreational property and we are proposing to do something. It's really a recreational use, but I'm not sure what we're applying for.
Mr. Jaisingh: If we were to do it at our park in Kissimmee or St. Cloud or the county, I would say that we would need to have a permit, but being that it's our park and we control the aspects of the park, I'm not so sure if we need to go through the county.
Mr. Soukup: We have the facilities.
Mr. Brown: So, do the people that have facilities that have private property and they still have to do it. I don't think that us being quasi-governmental keeps us out of that process because we still have to pull permits. We can't permit ourselves according to Statute.
Mr. Jaisingh: We can definitely look into it.
Mr. Brown: If you ask them and they say, "You don't need to do that," I'm fine with that. Mr. Jaisingh: You worked for the county. You know they never say that.
Mr. Brown: That's not necessarily true. Sometimes I think that people have to do things and then they'll tell me, "Oh no, you're misinterpreting that. " Then often I'm like, "Okay, that's fine. That's betterfor them. "
Mr. Jaisingh: I would say we definitely look at it.
Mr. Brown: It really just has to do with the fact that people are coming here and purchasing. We had some people in another neighborhood that wanted to bring food trucks because they didn't have what they needed for it. We have everything we need for it and it should be easy.
Mr. Soukup: I agree.
Mr. Clark: So, we will inquire.
Mr. Brown: It's just a matter of getting that use. Mr. Jaisingh: I have no problem with that.

Mr. Clark: You'll note also that there was a discussion, but I'm not sure of the decision last night. I put in a provision that requires them to hire an off-duty officer. But I think if I remember the conversation, we were going to feel more comfortable if they did that.
Mr. Jaisingh: Yes.
Mr. Clark: Let's not table it. I don't think we need a motion, but I would like for staff to look at the permitting issue.
Mr. Soukup: Right.
Mr. Jaisingh: Right.
Mr. Clark: It might be appropriate to go ahead and send the draft agreement to the HOA
and get that side of the process handled.
Mr. Showe: I'll do that.
Mr. Clark: We'll just take that as direction and then we'll bring that back for further discussion.
Ms. Zaresk: I think that's a good idea. The agreement looks good though.

Engineer
Mr. Soukup: That brings us to the Engineer's Report.
Mr. Glasscock: I gave you proposals for the speed hump on Knightsbridge. The other contractor, I'm trying to get one from them. They kept dragging, dragging, dragging and telling me how busy they are. I asked them if they could beat $55,000. They said no. So, this is what we got from Camcor, who was the lowest of the two original contractors. When I asked them if their price was still good, they said no and laughed. It did go up by $4,180 for both sides, double with.
Mr. Soukup: Are there any questions on the proposal?
Mr. Showe: I think we would need a motion to approve because the original motion was a not-to-exceed of $45.000.
Mr. Glasscock: I would include a contingency or a not-to-exceed and authorization for the Chairman to sign off on it.
Mr. Soukup: What not-to-exceed amount? Mr. Glasscock: A not-to-exceed of $60,000.

On MOTION by Mr. Brown seconded by Ms. Zaresk with all in favor authorizing a not-to-exceed amount of $60,000 for a speed hump on Knightsbridge was approved.

District Manager's Report
Mr. Showe: I have two quick items to update the Board on. One item is swim lessons. They reached out to us today. We can bring an agreement back to the next meeting as long as there's no opposition from the Board.
Mr. Brown: Is it the same group?
Mr. Showe: Yes. So, we'll bring that back. The other one is I talked to a vendor earlier today that installs cameras at guardhouses. Those cameras read license plates, which somehow transmit that information to law enforcement. We never ran into this anywhere. I did express concerns that the CDD is not a law enforcement agency. This is not really a benefit to the CDD. It's more of a community type benefit.
Mr. Clark: Is it transmitted in real-time or do cars run around with cameras getting license
plates?
Mr. Showe: Yes, they get license plates.
Mr. Soukup: That's the only difference between what we do now and then. Ms. Zaresk: Exactly.
Mr. Clark: By Statute, our camera feeds are confidential, but we can give them to law
enforcement for a proper purpose.
Mr. Showe: The way he explained it to me, the cameras feed the information directly to the Sheriffs Office, but all they do is read licensed plates. So, when a guard comes through and gets a license plate, it reads it and transmits it.
Ms. Zaresk: Like Silver Alerts and if you're looking for Amber Alerts or a particular felon, if they're out and there's a license plate associated with them. We wouldn't do any reporting. It's just fees and the technologies used it for. When I worked with CBP we used LPRs at the border. The only reason I sent it to Jason was I liked the idea that there was no affirmative action on our part. If you went with the system, it wasn't relying on somebody to call the police, but I have no idea beyond that whether the benefit of it...
Mr. Showe: I expressed similar concerns.
Mr. Clark: Yeah. I think it's just a little bit beyond what we should do.

Mr. Jaisingh: Does it just copy license plates and forward it to the Sheriffs Department or is there an algorithm that it's actually running the plates and sending the information as well as the license plate numbers? Does it copy just the license plate numbers or run them and then disclose the information?
Mr. Showe: I got the impression that it's capturing the license plate numbers, but it's not just taking a picture. Its translating that to some file that then gets through the FBI. If the county's looking for certain license plates, it will get through their systems.
Mr. Jaisingh: My honest opinion is that it's a bit too invasive for the community. Yeah, there are a few bad apples in the community, but it doesn't outweigh...
Mr. Showe: No worries. I'm just bringing this up as an idea. If you want us to explore it more, we can.
Ms. Zaresk: I wasn't endorsing it. I know that we share information when asked for it. I'm fine with not doing it.
Mr. Showe: They are also a little expensive. Ms. Zaresk: I kind of figured they would be. Mr. Brown: Oh, so they want us to pay for it? Mr. Showe: Oh, yeah.
Mr. Brown: We get no benefit and they want us to pay? Screw that.

Approval of Check Register
Mr. Showe: We have the approval of the Check Register. In your General Fund, we have Checks #6914 through #6933 for $79,493.06. The invoices of the checks are summarized behind that and both Alan and I can answer any questions or we can take a motion to approve.
Mr. Soukup: Are there any questions on Check Register? If not, we need a motion for approval.

On MOTION by Mr. Brown seconded by Ms. Zaresk with all in favor the December 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022 Check Register in the amount of $79,493.06 was approved.

Balance Sheet and Income Statement
Mr. Showe: Next is the Balance Sheet and Income Statement. No action is required by the Board. We're in good shape in terms of budget to actuals through the first quarter. We're at 90% collected on our assessments already, so we're in great shape there.

Presentation of OCSO Reports
Mr. Showe: We've also included any Osceola County Sheriffs Office Reports that we get.

Field Manager's Report
Mr. Showe: Alan can go through his Field Manager's Report.
Mr. Scheerer: Okay. Not much is happening at the Rec Center. The amenities are in good shape. The Fitness Center is in good shape. The pool is in good shape. I did get a text message from security last week that the barcode reader at the Partin Settlement Road gate wasn't working. ACT responded and found out that there's a battery backup that operates that system that had failed. So, they came out and replaced the battery backup. We gave them a barcode that we have because there were some questions on some of the barcodes that aren't working, to make sure when they test the gate systems at the barcode, that it's one of ours and not one of theirs. So, he tested this one. He went over to the E. Lakeshore Boulevard gate and double-checked that one as well. As far as I know, I haven't received any complaints from security or any residents. So, as of this meeting, as far as I know, the BAI barcode automation system is working as planned.
Ms. Zaresk: The barcodes is one thing. Is there anything that we did at the E. Lakeshore Boulevard gate that you can think of that would have invalidated clickers?
Mr. Scheerer: No.
Ms. Zaresk: Okay. Mine has been working fine. But I had somebody in the community say their clicker was not working.
Mr. Brown: Mine doesn't work up there. Ms. Zaresk: Really.
Mr. Scheerer: We've met a couple different times with a couple of different residents because they said the same thing. It was just a matter of, I guess, they just modified the antenna. I don't know. But we're not issuing them anymore so it's not anything that we can provide, but if somebody has a problem and we can get with ACT, I'm sure that we can arrange a meeting during business hours. We can just check the clicker, but they need to change their batteries, do the normal

stuff, make sure the dip switches are in the correct position because a lot of times maybe when they're changing the battery they switch out.
Ms. Zaresk: Yeah. Okay. I just wanted to verify that.
Mr. Scheerer: Yes, ma'am. I have not had any complaints about the clicker. Also, a few months back, the Board approved the quarterly gate maintenance program with them. They came out and found a couple of belts and a couple of minor things, which we automatically approved and they fixed during the quarterly maintenance. For landscaping, I'm meeting with the REW on a weekly basis on the same stuff. They're still working on all the neighborhoods. New annuals were installed. As you leave Partin Settlement Road and head towards 192, if you look on the berm on the right side, we have about three pine trees that are starting to go. I've already spoke with REW. We're going to come in, flush cut those and get rid of them. They probably have pine needles or some crazy thing out there that's causing them to decline, but those will be coming out. Then, Ms. Patrick up here on Farrington, we got all of her work done. We're just trying to get the stump grinder in there so we get those ground down and put some sod in. Hopefully, that will take care of that project. The Christmas lights were removed, as you can tell. If you haven't noticed, our sidewalk guy is on-site and he's going to town. Once all the sidewalks have been ground down, he's marking all of the ones that he recommends being replaced. Once that's completed, we'll tour the property, double-check everything and approve all of the replacements. There were three potholes that we were asked to repair. Those are complete. The basketball nets were repaired. We waited two months this time, almost to the point where there was no basketball net. Then we're going to have Frank's out to service both AC units at the guardhouses. They'll pull the two units at each guardhouse, clean them all out and get them ready for Spring. The street sweeper has been kind of busy, I understand Pam that you've got a concern with that?
Ms. Zaresk: Well, I just wanted to convey to the street sweeper that we have a circle, obviously. He goes around, but he doesn't go around the interior. What he puts there is fine, but if he could do the other side of the street.
Mr. Scheerer: He needs to tum around and go the other way. Ms. Zaresk: Yeah.
Mr. Scheerer: I don't think he thought about that. He usually just focuses on the right-hand side of the curbs. But I'll reach out to the guy I've been dealing with lately and restate that and also

make sure that he's getting into these cul-de-sacs. I know that Ken had mentioned that they need to get as close as they can to the curbs on both sides.
Mr. Mehrlich: He slacked on the cul-de-sacs on his last go around. Mr. Scheerer: Alright. We just told him not to do yours.
Mr. Mehrlich: I can tell.
Mr. Scheerer: There is nothing wrong with your cul-de-sac, sir. I can tell you that right now. I'll make sure that he does that. We've had that problem periodically with drivers on these little bump-outs. They have to make sure that they come back and hit the bump-outs. So, I'll restate that to them as well.
Mr. Brown: The pine trees down there. Mr. Scheerer: Yeah.
Mr. Brown: Are any of those the ones that, a few months ago, the guy was complaining

about?

Mr. Soukup: I think that's further down.
Mr. Scheerer: No, it's probably in the same area. It's in the general vicinity, but the ones

further towards the lake are fine. It happens. We only have one. Then I noticed that one was dead. Then when I was out last Friday, I drove out that way when we were looking at everything and noticed that these were starting to fail. They're not dead yet, but it's not just those things losing their leaves because it's Winter. There's definitely a problem there.
Mr. Jaisingh: Do they take them out and replace them?
Mr. Scheerer: No. They're clustered together. If you want them put back, we can put them
back.
Ms. Zaresk: He was saying something else.
Mr. Scheerer: Maybe. Let's wait and see after all of these modifications. We may not have
enough space in there to put them in. once all is said and done. If you didn't know, this is just an FYI, REW was purchased by Down to Earth (DTE). So, you may see some invoices in here that say REW-DTE. If they're still operating as REW, they have a two-year agreement to keep their name as everything is right now, but I noticed that some of the invoicing that I received this month says, "REW-DTE", but it's still REW. Just the maintenance division and landscape maintenance division were purchased by DTE. So, if there are any changes to that, I'm sure Scott will have us make some modifications to that.

Mr. Soukup: In the agreement.
Mr. Scheerer: If that's the case, I'll make sure that we give Scott that information. Mr. Clark: We're going to ask for it.
Mr. Scheerer: Okay. Other than that, it's starting to warm up. Here we go. Ms. Zaresk: Until next week.

NINTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Supervisor's Requests
Mr. Soukup: That brings us to Supervisor's Requests. Mr. Jaisingh? Mr. Jaisingh: Nothing.
Mr. Soukup: Ms. Zaresk? Ms. Zaresk: No, thanks. Mr. Soukup: Mr. Brown?
Mr. Brown: I talked about mine. Mr. Soukup: Mr. Mehrlich?
Mr. Mehrlich: Nothing.

TENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Next Meeting Date - February 28, 2023
Mr. Soukup: Our next meeting is set for February 28th.

ELEVENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS
Mr. Soukup adjourned the meeting.

Adjournment